vivisectionist

简明释义

英[ˌvɪvɪˈsekʃənɪst]美[ˌvɪvəˈsekʃənɪst]

n. 活体解剖者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Mention of animal experiments was like a red rag to a bull to the anti-vivisectionist.

对反对活体解剖者来说，一提到动物实验他就暴跳如雷。

2.Mention of animal experiments was like a red rag to a bull to the anti-vivisectionist.

对反对活体解剖者来说，一提到动物实验他就暴跳如雷。

3.Critics of the vivisectionist 活体解剖学家 pointed out that there are alternative methods that do not involve animal testing.

对这位vivisectionist 活体解剖学家的批评者指出，有不涉及动物实验的替代方法。

4.In a heated discussion, the vivisectionist 活体解剖学家 defended his methods as necessary for medical advancements.

在一次激烈的讨论中，这位vivisectionist 活体解剖学家为他的研究方法辩护，称其对医学进步是必要的。

5.The debate on animal rights often features a passionate argument from the vivisectionist 活体解剖学家 who believes that scientific progress requires animal testing.

关于动物权利的辩论中，常常会出现一位热情的vivisectionist 活体解剖学家，他认为科学进步需要动物实验。

6.The vivisectionist 活体解剖学家 argued that the benefits of his research outweighed the ethical concerns raised by animal rights activists.

这位vivisectionist 活体解剖学家辩称，他的研究所带来的好处超过了动物权利活动家提出的伦理问题。

7.Many students in the biology class were shocked to learn that their professor was a renowned vivisectionist 活体解剖学家 known for his controversial research.

生物课上的许多学生震惊地得知他们的教授是一位著名的vivisectionist 活体解剖学家，以其有争议的研究而闻名。

作文

The debate surrounding animal rights has been a prominent issue in society for many years. One of the most contentious topics within this debate is the practice of vivisection, which involves conducting experiments on live animals. The individuals who perform these procedures are known as vivisectionists (活体解剖者), and their work often raises ethical questions regarding the treatment of animals in the name of scientific advancement. Vivisection has a long history, dating back to ancient Greece, where philosophers like Aristotle conducted dissections to understand anatomy. However, the modern understanding of vivisection began in the 19th century when scientists sought to explore physiological processes in living organisms. This led to significant medical breakthroughs, but it also sparked a fierce backlash from animal rights activists. The primary argument against the practices of vivisectionists (活体解剖者) is the suffering inflicted on animals. Many believe that subjecting animals to pain and distress for the sake of research is morally indefensible. They argue that animals have the right to live free from harm, and that their lives should not be sacrificed for human benefit.On the other hand, proponents of vivisection argue that such practices are essential for medical progress. They contend that many treatments and surgical techniques used today were developed through research involving live animals. For instance, vaccines, anesthetics, and various surgical procedures have all benefited from the insights gained through the work of vivisectionists (活体解剖者). Supporters claim that without these experiments, many diseases would remain untreatable, and countless lives would be lost.In recent years, advancements in technology have provided alternative methods to traditional vivisection. Techniques such as computer modeling, in vitro testing, and advanced imaging allow researchers to study biological processes without harming animals. These alternatives have prompted some to call for a reduction in the reliance on vivisectionists (活体解剖者) and to seek more humane approaches to research. The ethical considerations surrounding the work of vivisectionists (活体解剖者) are complex and multifaceted. While the potential benefits to human health are significant, the moral implications of causing suffering to sentient beings cannot be overlooked. Society must grapple with the balance between scientific progress and the welfare of animals. As public awareness of animal rights grows, there is increasing pressure on researchers to justify their use of animals in experiments and to explore alternative methods whenever possible.In conclusion, the role of vivisectionists (活体解剖者) in the scientific community remains a polarizing issue. While their contributions to medicine are undeniable, the ethical dilemmas posed by their work continue to provoke heated discussions. It is essential for society to engage in these conversations, considering both the potential benefits of vivisection and the rights of animals. Ultimately, the goal should be to find a path forward that respects both human health and animal welfare, leading to a more compassionate approach to scientific inquiry.

围绕动物权利的辩论在社会中已成为一个显著的问题。这个辩论中最具争议的话题之一是活体解剖的做法，即对活体动物进行实验。执行这些程序的个人被称为vivisectionists（活体解剖者），他们的工作常常引发关于科学进步名义下动物待遇的伦理问题。活体解剖有着悠久的历史，可以追溯到古希腊，当时哲学家如亚里士多德进行了解剖以理解解剖学。然而，现代对活体解剖的理解始于19世纪，当时科学家们试图探索活体生物体内的生理过程。这导致了重大的医学突破，但也引发了动物权利活动家强烈的反击。反对vivisectionists（活体解剖者）做法的主要论点是对动物造成的痛苦。许多人认为，为了研究而使动物遭受痛苦和困扰是道德上不可辩解的。他们认为动物有权生活在没有伤害的环境中，他们的生命不应因人类的利益而被牺牲。另一方面，支持活体解剖的人则认为，这种做法对医学进步至关重要。他们主张，今天使用的许多治疗方法和外科技术都是通过涉及活体动物的研究开发出来的。例如，疫苗、麻醉剂和各种外科手术程序都从vivisectionists（活体解剖者）的工作中获得了见解。支持者声称，如果没有这些实验，许多疾病将仍然无法治愈，无数生命将会失去。近年来，科技的进步提供了传统活体解剖的替代方法。计算机建模、体外测试和先进成像等技术使研究人员能够在不伤害动物的情况下研究生物过程。这些替代方案促使一些人呼吁减少对vivisectionists（活体解剖者）的依赖，并寻求更人道的研究方法。围绕vivisectionists（活体解剖者）工作的伦理考量是复杂且多方面的。虽然对人类健康的潜在好处是显著的，但造成感知生物痛苦的道德影响也不能被忽视。社会必须努力平衡科学进步与动物福利之间的关系。随着公众对动物权利意识的增强，研究人员越来越受到压力，需要为他们在实验中使用动物的理由辩护，并在可能的情况下探索替代方法。总之，vivisectionists（活体解剖者）在科学界的角色仍然是一个极具争议的话题。尽管他们对医学的贡献不可否认，但他们工作的伦理困境仍然引发激烈讨论。社会必须参与这些对话，考虑活体解剖的潜在好处和动物的权利。最终，目标应该是找到一条尊重人类健康和动物福利的前进道路，从而导致对科学探究更具同情心的方法。