appealable
简明释义
adj. 可上诉的
英英释义
Capable of being appealed; subject to appeal in a court of law. | 能够上诉的;在法律上可以提出上诉的。 |
单词用法
可向更高法院上诉 | |
可上诉的判决 | |
可上诉的决定 | |
可上诉事项 |
同义词
可争议的 | 该决定可以在更高的法院进行争议。 | ||
可审查的 | 她的案件可以由上诉法院进行审查。 | ||
可反驳的 | 这些发现可以根据新证据进行反驳。 |
反义词
最终的 | 法庭的裁决是最终的,无法上诉。 | ||
不可上诉的 | The ruling was deemed unappealable due to lack of jurisdiction. | 由于缺乏管辖权,该裁决被认为是不可上诉的。 |
例句
1.In the civil procedure of many countries and districts, appealable interest is an essential requisite to raise appeal procedure.
许多国家和地区的民事诉讼中,上诉利益是上诉的诉讼要件或有效要件之一。
2.This use case generates an appealable monetary document, which is mailed to the claimant; fall away or copy goes to UI staff.
此用例产生可用于上诉的货币文件,并传送给原告;向用户界面职员复制。
3.In the civil procedure of many countries and districts, appealable interest is an essential requisite to raise appeal procedure.
许多国家和地区的民事诉讼中,上诉利益是上诉的诉讼要件或有效要件之一。
4.In case (a) a non-appealable judgment;
如果(a)有不可上诉的判决;
5.The judge explained that the verdict was appealable based on new evidence.
法官解释说,基于新证据,判决是可上诉的。
6.Her case was deemed appealable by the legal team after reviewing the facts.
法律团队审查事实后认为她的案件是可上诉的。
7.The court's decision is appealable to a higher authority.
法院的决定是可上诉的,可以向更高的权威提出上诉。
8.If you disagree with the ruling, it is appealable within 30 days.
如果你不同意裁决,这个裁决在30天内是可上诉的。
9.The ruling on the zoning issue is appealable to the city council.
关于区域划分问题的裁决是可上诉的,可以向市议会提出上诉。
作文
In the realm of law, the term appealable refers to a decision or ruling that can be challenged in a higher court. This concept is fundamental to the judicial system, as it ensures that individuals have the right to seek further review of a decision that they believe is unjust. The ability to appeal is a cornerstone of justice, allowing for the correction of errors and the protection of rights. For instance, if a defendant is convicted of a crime and believes that the trial was unfair due to improper evidence being admitted, they can file an appealable motion to have the higher court review the case. This process not only provides a check on the lower courts but also reinforces public confidence in the legal system.The importance of having appealable decisions cannot be overstated. It serves as a safeguard for individuals against potential judicial errors. Without the ability to appeal, a wrongful conviction could lead to severe consequences for the innocent party, including imprisonment or a permanent criminal record. Additionally, the appeals process is essential for maintaining consistency and fairness in the application of the law. When cases are reviewed by higher courts, it allows for the establishment of legal precedents that guide future rulings, thereby promoting uniformity in legal interpretations.Moreover, the appealable nature of certain decisions encourages judges to be more meticulous in their rulings. Knowing that their decisions can be scrutinized by a higher authority, judges may take extra care to ensure that their judgments are well-founded and justifiable. This additional layer of accountability helps to uphold the integrity of the judicial system.However, the appeals process is not without its challenges. One significant issue is the time and resources required to pursue an appealable case. Many individuals may find themselves unable to afford the costs associated with an appeal, which can include attorney fees, court costs, and other related expenses. This financial burden can deter individuals from seeking justice, particularly in cases where the stakes are high. Consequently, there is an ongoing debate about the accessibility of the appeals process and how it can be improved to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their financial situation, have the opportunity to challenge potentially erroneous decisions.Additionally, the appeals process can sometimes lead to prolonged legal battles, creating uncertainty for all parties involved. Victims may feel that justice is delayed, while defendants may experience anxiety over the potential outcomes of their appeals. This dynamic can strain relationships and exacerbate conflicts, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to the appeals process.In conclusion, the concept of appealable decisions plays a crucial role in the legal landscape. It provides individuals with the opportunity to challenge and rectify potential injustices, ensuring that the judicial system remains fair and accountable. While there are challenges associated with the appeals process, such as financial barriers and prolonged timelines, the fundamental principle of allowing for review and correction of judicial decisions is vital for the preservation of justice. As society continues to evolve, it is essential to address these challenges and enhance the accessibility and efficiency of the appeals process, ensuring that the right to appeal remains a fundamental aspect of our legal system.
在法律领域,术语appealable指的是可以在更高法院挑战的决定或裁决。这个概念是司法系统的基础,因为它确保个人有权寻求对他们认为不公正的决定进行进一步审查。上诉的能力是正义的基石,允许纠正错误和保护权利。例如,如果被告被判定犯罪,并认为由于不当证据被接受而导致审判不公,他们可以提交一个appealable动议,请求更高法院审查案件。这个过程不仅为下级法院提供了制衡,还增强了公众对法律系统的信心。拥有appealable决定的重要性不容小觑。它作为个人防止潜在司法错误的保障。如果没有上诉的能力,错误定罪可能会给无辜的一方带来严重后果,包括监禁或永久刑事记录。此外,上诉过程对于维护法律应用的一致性和公平性至关重要。当案件被更高法院审查时,可以建立法律先例,以指导未来的裁决,从而促进法律解释的一致性。此外,某些决定的appealable性质鼓励法官在裁决时更加细致周到。知道他们的决定可能会受到更高权威的审查,法官可能会更加谨慎,以确保他们的判决是有根据和合理的。这一额外的问责机制有助于维护司法系统的诚信。然而,上诉过程并非没有挑战。一个显著的问题是追求appealable案件所需的时间和资源。许多人可能发现自己无法承担与上诉相关的费用,包括律师费、法院费用和其他相关开支。这种财务负担可能会阻止个人寻求正义,特别是在利益高昂的案件中。因此,关于上诉过程的可及性及如何改善以确保所有人,无论其财务状况如何,都有机会挑战潜在错误的决定,仍然存在着持续的争论。此外,上诉过程有时会导致漫长的法律斗争,为所有相关方创造不确定性。受害者可能会觉得正义被延迟,而被告可能会因上诉的潜在结果而感到焦虑。这种动态可能会加剧关系紧张并加剧冲突,突显出对上诉过程采取平衡方法的必要性。总之,appealable决定的概念在法律领域中发挥着关键作用。它为个人提供了挑战和纠正潜在不公的机会,确保司法系统保持公平和负责任。尽管与上诉过程相关的挑战,如财务障碍和延长的时间表,但允许审查和纠正司法决定的基本原则对于维护正义至关重要。随着社会的不断发展,解决这些挑战并增强上诉过程的可及性和效率至关重要,以确保上诉权仍然是我们法律系统的基本方面。