unreason

简明释义

英[ʌnˈrizən]美[ʌnˈrizən]

n. 缺乏理智，没有理性

v. （使）失去理智

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Life and death, attack and freedom, emotion and will power are core elements of unreason.

生和死、攻击和自由、情感和意志是非理性的核心要素。

2.Life and death, attack and freedom, emotion and will power are core elements of unreason.

生和死、攻击和自由、情感和意志是非理性的核心要素。

3.His decision to quit without any explanation was seen as an act of unreason.

他没有任何解释就辞职的决定被视为一种不理智的行为。

4.In moments of unreason, we often say things we don't mean.

在冲动的时刻，我们常常说出一些并不真实的话。

5.Her unreason during the negotiation cost the company a lucrative deal.

她在谈判中的不理性让公司失去了一个有利可图的交易。

6.The professor warned against unreason in academic debates.

教授警告在学术辩论中要避免无理性。

7.The argument escalated into unreason as both sides refused to listen.

争论升级为无理取闹，因为双方都拒绝倾听。

作文

In today's world, we often encounter situations where people act with unreason. This term refers to a lack of logical thinking or rationality in decision-making and behavior. As we navigate through various aspects of life—whether in personal relationships, workplaces, or societal interactions—it becomes increasingly important to recognize and address unreason in ourselves and others. One common example of unreason can be seen in heated arguments. When emotions run high, individuals may abandon logic and resort to irrational statements or actions. For instance, during a disagreement, a person might say something hurtful that they do not truly mean, simply because they are overwhelmed by their feelings. This is a clear manifestation of unreason, as the individual is not engaging in constructive dialogue but rather letting their emotions dictate their responses. Moreover, unreason can also manifest in decision-making processes. In the workplace, for example, a manager might choose to implement a new policy based on personal bias rather than on data-driven evidence. This kind of decision-making can lead to negative consequences for both employees and the organization as a whole. It highlights the importance of remaining objective and relying on facts instead of succumbing to unreason. Another area where unreason is prevalent is in the realm of social media. The rapid spread of information—both accurate and inaccurate—can lead to a culture where people react without taking the time to think critically about the content they consume. Misinformation can easily provoke outrage, and individuals may share posts or comments fueled by unreason rather than seeking to understand the full context. This behavior not only perpetuates false narratives but also fosters division among communities. To combat unreason, it is essential to cultivate critical thinking skills. By encouraging ourselves and others to question assumptions and evaluate evidence, we can foster a more rational discourse. For instance, when faced with a controversial topic, we should strive to seek out multiple perspectives, engage in respectful discussions, and avoid jumping to conclusions based solely on emotion. Furthermore, practicing empathy can help mitigate unreason. When we take the time to understand where another person is coming from, we can create a space for dialogue that prioritizes reason over emotion. This can lead to more productive conversations and a greater chance of finding common ground. In conclusion, unreason is a significant barrier to effective communication and decision-making in our lives. By recognizing its presence in our interactions and working to counteract it through critical thinking and empathy, we can foster a more rational and understanding society. It is our responsibility to challenge unreason in ourselves and others, ultimately leading to better outcomes in our personal and collective endeavors.

在当今世界，我们经常遇到人们以不理性的方式行事的情况。这个术语指的是在决策和行为中缺乏逻辑思维或理性的状态。当我们在生活的各个方面——无论是个人关系、工作场所还是社会互动中——导航时，认识和应对自己和他人的不理性变得越来越重要。一个常见的不理性例子可以在激烈争论中看到。当情绪高涨时，个人可能会放弃逻辑，诉诸于不理性的陈述或行为。例如，在争执中，一个人可能会说出一些伤人的话，而这些话并不是他们真正想说的，只是因为他们被情感淹没。这是不理性的明确表现，因为这个人并没有参与建设性的对话，而是让情感支配了他们的反应。此外，不理性还可以在决策过程中表现出来。在工作场所，例如，一个经理可能基于个人偏见而不是基于数据驱动的证据来决定实施新政策。这种决策方式可能会对员工和整个组织产生负面影响。这突显出保持客观的重要性，并依赖事实，而不是屈服于不理性。另一个不理性盛行的领域是社交媒体。在信息传播迅速的环境中，准确与不准确的信息都可能导致一种文化，人们在没有花时间批判性思考他们所消费内容的情况下做出反应。错误信息很容易引发愤怒，个人可能会分享帖子或评论，这些都是由不理性推动的，而不是试图理解完整的背景。这种行为不仅延续了虚假叙述，还加剧了社区之间的分裂。为了抵制不理性，培养批判性思维技能至关重要。通过鼓励自己和他人质疑假设和评估证据，我们可以促进更理性的讨论。例如，当面对一个有争议的话题时，我们应该努力寻找多个视角，进行尊重的讨论，并避免仅根据情感做出结论。此外，实践同理心可以帮助减轻不理性。当我们花时间去理解另一个人的立场时，我们可以创造一个优先考虑理性而非情感的对话空间。这可以导致更富有成效的对话，并更有可能找到共同点。总之，不理性是我们生活中有效沟通和决策的重大障碍。通过认识到它在我们互动中的存在，并努力通过批判性思维和同理心来对抗它，我们可以促进一个更理性和理解的社会。挑战自己和他人中的不理性是我们的责任，最终将导致我们个人和集体努力的更好结果。