malfeasant

简明释义

英[ˌmælˈfiːzənt]美[ˌmælˈfiːzənt]

n. 贪官污吏；犯罪者

adj. 不法行为的；行为不正的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Apply professor complement to say, in fact, a lot of netizens inform against malfeasant is to stem from conscience and responsibility heart completely, award is next.

施教授补充说，事实上，很多网民举报贪官污吏完全是出于良知和责任心，奖励倒是其次的。

2.Of this case adjudge also ring noisy alarm bell again to fictitious belongings malfeasant.

此案的宣判也给虚拟财产犯罪者再次敲响警钟。

3.Apply professor complement to say, in fact, a lot of netizens inform against malfeasant is to stem from conscience and responsibility heart completely, award is next.

施教授补充说，事实上，很多网民举报贪官污吏完全是出于良知和责任心，奖励倒是其次的。

4.He was accused of being a malfeasant 不当行为者 after evidence surfaced of his fraudulent activities.

在他的欺诈活动证据曝光后，他被指控为一名malfeasant 不当行为者。

5.During the investigation, several malfeasant 不当行为者 employees were identified and fired.

在调查过程中，几名malfeasant 不当行为者员工被识别并解雇。

6.The court found the politician to be a malfeasant 不当行为者 for misusing public funds.

法庭发现这位政治家是一个malfeasant 不当行为者，因为他滥用公款。

7.The judge ruled that the actions of the malfeasant 不当行为者 were in direct violation of the law.

法官裁定该malfeasant 不当行为者的行为直接违反了法律。

8.The company's malfeasant 不当行为者 activities led to a major scandal that damaged its reputation.

公司的malfeasant 不当行为者活动导致了一场重大的丑闻，损害了其声誉。

作文

In the realm of governance and public service, the term malfeasant refers to an individual who engages in wrongful or unlawful behavior while performing their official duties. This concept is particularly relevant when discussing the ethical standards expected of public officials and the consequences of their actions on society. The presence of malfeasant individuals in positions of power can lead to a significant erosion of public trust and a deterioration of the moral fabric of our institutions. To illustrate the impact of malfeasant behavior, one can look at historical examples where leaders have abused their authority for personal gain. For instance, numerous scandals involving politicians and government officials have revealed how misuse of power can result in financial corruption, fraud, and exploitation of vulnerable populations. When a malfeasant official prioritizes their interests over the welfare of the community, it not only harms those directly affected but also sets a dangerous precedent for future leaders. Moreover, the consequences of malfeasant actions extend beyond immediate harm; they can instigate widespread disillusionment among citizens. When the electorate perceives that their representatives are acting unethically, it diminishes civic engagement and participation in the democratic process. Citizens may feel that their voices do not matter, leading to apathy and a lack of accountability in governance. This cycle of distrust can be challenging to break, as it often requires systemic changes to restore faith in public institutions. Addressing the issue of malfeasant behavior necessitates a multifaceted approach. First and foremost, robust mechanisms for oversight and accountability must be established. This includes the implementation of strict regulations and transparency measures that hold public officials accountable for their actions. Whistleblower protections should also be reinforced to encourage individuals to report unethical conduct without fear of retaliation.Additionally, fostering a culture of integrity within public service is essential. Training programs that emphasize ethical decision-making and the importance of serving the public good can help cultivate a sense of responsibility among officials. By instilling these values early on, we can reduce the likelihood of malfeasant behavior occurring in the first place.The role of the media in exposing malfeasant actions cannot be overlooked either. Investigative journalism serves as a critical tool in holding power to account and shining a light on corruption. By bringing such issues to the forefront, the media plays a vital role in informing the public and spurring action against wrongdoing.In conclusion, the term malfeasant encapsulates the detrimental effects of unethical behavior in public service. It is incumbent upon society to recognize and combat such actions through accountability, education, and vigilant oversight. Only by addressing the root causes of malfeasant behavior can we hope to build a more trustworthy and effective system of governance that truly serves the needs of its citizens.

在治理和公共服务的领域中，术语malfeasant指的是在执行官方职责时从事不当或非法行为的个人。这个概念在讨论公共官员所期望的道德标准及其行为对社会的影响时尤为相关。malfeasant个体在权力位置上的存在会导致公众信任的显著侵蚀以及我们机构道德结构的恶化。为了说明malfeasant行为的影响，可以看看历史上那些滥用权力以谋取私利的领导者的例子。例如，涉及政治家和政府官员的众多丑闻揭示了权力滥用如何导致经济腐败、欺诈和对弱势群体的剥削。当一位malfeasant官员将个人利益置于社区福利之上时，这不仅会伤害直接受影响的人，还会为未来的领导者设定一个危险的先例。此外，malfeasant行为的后果超出了直接的伤害；它们可能引发公民广泛的失望。当选民认为他们的代表在不道德地行事时，这会削弱公民参与民主过程的积极性。公民可能会感到他们的声音无关紧要，从而导致冷漠和对治理缺乏问责制。这种不信任的循环可能很难打破，因为它通常需要系统性的变化来恢复公众对公共机构的信任。解决malfeasant行为问题需要多方面的方法。首先，必须建立强有力的监督和问责机制。这包括实施严格的法规和透明度措施，以追究公共官员的行为责任。还应加强对举报人的保护，以鼓励个人在没有报复恐惧的情况下报告不道德行为。此外，在公共服务中培养诚信文化也是至关重要的。强调道德决策和服务公共利益重要性的培训项目可以帮助培养官员的责任感。通过早期灌输这些价值观，我们可以减少malfeasant行为发生的可能性。媒体在揭露malfeasant行为中的作用也不可忽视。调查性新闻报道作为追究权力责任和揭示腐败的重要工具，发挥着关键作用。通过将此类问题带到前台，媒体在告知公众和促使对不当行为采取行动方面发挥着重要作用。总之，术语malfeasant概括了公共服务中不道德行为的有害影响。社会有责任认识并打击这种行为，通过问责制、教育和警惕的监督来实现。只有通过解决malfeasant行为的根本原因，我们才能希望建立一个更值得信赖和有效的治理体系，真正服务于公民的需求。