imputed

简明释义

英[ɪmˈpjuːtɪd]美[ɪmˈpjuːtɪd]

估算

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.the crimes imputed to Richard.

归咎于理查德的罪行。

2.Christ's righteousness has been imputed to us.

基督的正直转递给了我们。

3.In justification Christ's righteousness is imputed to us as the only possible satisfaction of God's perfect justice.

我们得以称义是靠着基督的义归算在我们身上也是唯一能够达到上帝公义之标准。

4.Was the occasion and means of righteousness being imputed to him.

是纪念和手段的正义被归罪于他。

5.recovering the initial outlay plus imputed interest.

收回创始费用外加估算利息。

6.Something imputed, ascribed, or attributed.

归咎于；归因于，归罪于。

7.Display actual imputed cost calc.

显示实际估算成本计算。

8.This ignorance can often be imputed to personal responsibility.

这种无知多次能归咎于当事人，要他负责。

9.Based on the results of qualitative analysis, the main causes for entrainment can be conveniently imputed.

根据定性分析结果，可以方便地归属引起带液的主要原因。

10.The judge imputed the defendant's actions to a lack of supervision.

法官将被告的行为归因于缺乏监督。

11.The software imputed the values based on previous data entries.

该软件根据之前的数据输入推算了这些值。

12.The teacher imputed the student's poor performance to personal issues at home.

老师将学生的差劲表现归因于家庭中的个人问题。

13.The accountant imputed the expenses to the correct department.

会计将费用归因于了正确的部门。

14.In the study, the researchers imputed missing data using statistical methods.

在研究中，研究人员使用统计方法推测了缺失的数据。

作文

In today's society, the concept of accountability is often discussed in various contexts, from personal relationships to professional environments. One term that frequently arises in these discussions is 'imputed'—a word that carries significant weight when it comes to assigning responsibility or blame. To understand how this term operates within our daily interactions, we must first consider its definition. The term 'imputed' refers to attributing a particular action or fault to someone, often without direct evidence. This attribution can have profound implications on an individual's reputation and relationships.For instance, in a workplace scenario, if a project fails, the reasons for its failure may be 'imputed' to specific team members based on their roles or past performances. This can lead to a toxic environment where individuals feel unjustly blamed for failures that may not be entirely their fault. Such situations can create a culture of fear and mistrust among employees, as they become wary of taking risks or voicing their opinions. Consequently, it is crucial for leaders to foster an environment where accountability is balanced with understanding and support, rather than solely relying on the concept of 'imputed' blame.Moreover, in personal relationships, the act of 'imputing' can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. For example, if one partner frequently forgets to do chores, the other might 'impute' laziness or lack of care to them. However, this assumption may overlook underlying issues such as stress, mental health challenges, or external responsibilities. Therefore, open communication is vital in these situations to clarify intentions and feelings, preventing the 'imputed' faults from damaging the relationship further.Furthermore, the legal system often grapples with the consequences of 'imputed' actions. In cases of negligence or malpractice, courts may 'impute' liability to individuals or organizations based on circumstantial evidence or patterns of behavior. This raises ethical questions about fairness and justice, particularly when individuals are held accountable for actions they did not directly commit. The principle of 'imputed' responsibility can sometimes lead to miscarriages of justice, where innocent parties face severe repercussions due to circumstantial associations.On a broader scale, the media plays a significant role in how actions are 'imputed' to public figures. A single misstep can lead to a whirlwind of speculation and judgment, often without a fair examination of the facts. The rush to assign blame can overshadow the complexities of a situation, leading to a skewed public perception. This phenomenon highlights the need for responsible journalism that seeks to understand the full context before 'imputing' fault to individuals.In conclusion, the term 'imputed' serves as a reminder of the importance of careful consideration before assigning blame or responsibility. Whether in personal relationships, workplaces, legal settings, or media narratives, the act of 'imputing' can have far-reaching consequences. It is essential to approach situations with empathy and an open mind, recognizing that actions are often influenced by a multitude of factors. By doing so, we can create a more understanding and supportive environment where accountability is coupled with compassion, rather than mere attribution of fault. Ultimately, understanding the implications of 'imputed' actions can lead to healthier relationships and more just systems in society.

在当今社会，责任感的概念在各种背景下经常被讨论，从人际关系到职业环境。一个在这些讨论中经常出现的术语是“imputed”（归因于）——一个在分配责任或指责时具有重要意义的词。要理解这个术语在我们日常互动中的运作，我们首先必须考虑它的定义。术语“imputed”指的是将特定行为或过错归因于某人，通常没有直接证据。这种归因可能对个人的声誉和关系产生深远的影响。例如，在工作场所的场景中，如果一个项目失败，失败的原因可能会根据团队成员的角色或过去的表现而被“imputed”给特定的团队成员。这可能导致一种有毒的环境，个人感到因未必完全是他们的错而受到不公正的指责。这种情况可能会在员工之间造成恐惧和不信任的文化，因为他们变得害怕冒险或表达自己的意见。因此，领导者必须营造一种环境，在这种环境中，责任感与理解和支持相平衡，而不是单纯依赖“imputed”的指责。此外，在个人关系中，“imputed”的行为可能导致误解和冲突。例如，如果一方经常忘记做家务，另一方可能会将懒惰或缺乏关心“imputed”给他们。然而，这种假设可能忽视了潜在的问题，例如压力、心理健康挑战或外部责任。因此，在这些情况下，开放的沟通至关重要，以澄清意图和感受，防止“imputed”的过错进一步破坏关系。此外，法律系统常常面临“imputed”行为的后果。在疏忽或失职的案件中，法院可能会根据间接证据或行为模式将责任“imputed”给个人或组织。这引发了有关公平和正义的伦理问题，特别是当个人因未直接实施的行为而被追究责任时。“Imputed”责任的原则有时可能导致冤屈，毫无辜的人因情境关联而面临严重后果。在更广泛的层面上，媒体在如何将行为“imputed”给公众人物方面发挥着重要作用。一次失误可能导致一阵猜测和评判，通常没有公正地审查事实。急于分配责任可能掩盖情况的复杂性，导致公众认知的偏差。这一现象突显了负责任的新闻报道的必要性，寻求在“imputed”过错之前理解全部背景。总之，术语“imputed”提醒我们在分配指责或责任之前仔细考虑的重要性。无论是在个人关系、工作场所、法律环境还是媒体叙述中，“imputed”的行为都可能产生深远的后果。以同理心和开放的心态接近情况是至关重要的，认识到行为往往受到多种因素的影响。通过这样做，我们可以创造一个更加理解和支持的环境，在这里，责任感与同情心相结合，而不仅仅是归因于过错。最终，理解“imputed”行为的影响可以导致更健康的关系和社会中更公正的系统。