assassination

简明释义

英[əˌsæsɪˈneɪʃ(ə)n]美[əˌsæsɪˈneɪʃn]

n. 暗杀，行刺

复 数 a s s a s s i n a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.I hoped your house would have been some other one than this; as if there was not another house at Auteuil than that of the assassination!

我多么希望您的房子不会是这一幢，啊，好象欧特伊除了这个谋杀过人的房子以外就再也没有别的房子了似的！

2.She would like an investigation into the assassination of her husband.

她想要对其丈夫的遇刺进行调查。

3.As a young lawyer, he worked on the Warren Commission investigating John Kennedy's assassination.

作为一名年轻的律师，他对沃伦委员会调查约翰·肯尼迪遇刺案工作。

4.But after an assassination attempt against him in 1954, Nasser cracked down on the Brotherhood, and Qutb was caught up in the mass arrests that followed.

但在1954年，兄弟会企图暗杀纳赛尔，纳赛尔随后粉碎兄弟会，库特布也在后来的大规模逮捕中入狱。

5.The assassination of the president precipitated the country into war.

总统被暗杀使国家骤然陷入战争状态。

6.In the years following his assassination, a small wall in the sleepy riverside district of Kampa became something of a shrine.

在他被谋杀后的许多年里，河边昏昏欲睡的卡姆巴区一堵小小的墙变成了圣地。

7.The assassination of the political leader shocked the nation.

这位政治领袖的暗杀震惊了整个国家。

8.Many conspiracy theories arose after the assassination attempt.

在这次暗杀未遂后，许多阴谋论浮出水面。

9.The movie depicted the assassination of a famous historical figure.

这部电影描绘了一位著名历史人物的暗杀。

10.The investigation into the assassination revealed many secrets.

对这起暗杀事件的调查揭示了许多秘密。

11.Security was tightened following the assassination of the ambassador.

在大使被暗杀后，安全措施被加强。

作文

The term assassination refers to the deliberate killing of a prominent person, often for political or ideological reasons. Throughout history, assassination has played a significant role in shaping nations and influencing political landscapes. One of the most notable examples of assassination is the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in 1914, which sparked World War I. This event not only changed the course of history but also highlighted how the act of assassination can have far-reaching consequences.In modern times, assassination has continued to be a tool used by various groups and individuals to achieve their goals. The motivations behind such acts can vary widely, from political dissent to personal vendettas. For instance, the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 had a profound impact on the civil rights movement in the United States. His death galvanized activists and brought attention to the ongoing struggle for equality, demonstrating that the repercussions of assassination extend beyond the immediate loss of life.Moreover, the methods of assassination have evolved with advancements in technology. In the past, assassins often relied on firearms or close-range attacks. However, today’s world sees the use of more sophisticated tactics, including drone strikes and cyber warfare. These developments raise ethical questions about the legitimacy and morality of assassination as a means of achieving political ends. Is it ever justifiable to take a life for the sake of a greater cause? This question continues to spark debate among scholars, politicians, and the general public.The psychological impact of assassination cannot be overlooked either. The sudden loss of a leader can lead to chaos and uncertainty within a society. For example, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 left the American public in shock and mourning. It created a sense of vulnerability and fear, as people realized that even the highest office in the land was not immune to violence. This emotional response can lead to increased security measures and changes in policy, as governments strive to protect their leaders and citizens.Furthermore, assassination can also serve as a catalyst for change. In some cases, the death of a leader can inspire movements or revolutions. The assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan in 2007, for example, sparked widespread protests and calls for reform. Citizens rallied together, demanding justice and accountability, demonstrating how the act of assassination can mobilize people and bring about social change.In conclusion, the concept of assassination is complex and multifaceted. It serves as a reminder of the fragility of life and the power of political ideologies. While it may sometimes be seen as an effective means to an end, the consequences of assassination are often unpredictable and far-reaching. As we reflect on historical events and contemporary issues, it is crucial to consider the moral implications of such actions and strive for peaceful resolutions to conflicts instead of resorting to violence. Understanding the gravity of assassination allows us to appreciate the value of life and the importance of dialogue in a world often plagued by division and strife.

“刺杀”一词指的是故意杀害一个杰出人物，通常是出于政治或意识形态的原因。在历史上，“刺杀”在塑造国家和影响政治格局方面发挥了重要作用。最著名的“刺杀”案例之一是1914年奥匈帝国的弗朗茨·费迪南大公被刺杀，这一事件引发了第一次世界大战。这一事件不仅改变了历史的进程，也突显了“刺杀”这一行为可能带来的深远后果。在现代，“刺杀”仍然是各种团体和个人实现其目标所使用的工具。此类行为背后的动机可以有很大不同，从政治异议到个人仇恨。例如，1968年民权领袖马丁·路德·金被刺杀，对美国的民权运动产生了深远的影响。他的死激励了活动家，并引起了人们对持续争取平等斗争的关注，表明“刺杀”的后果超越了生命的直接损失。此外，随着技术的进步，“刺杀”的方式也在不断演变。在过去，刺客通常依赖于火器或近距离攻击。然而，今天的世界则看到更复杂的战术，包括无人机袭击和网络战争。这些发展引发了关于“刺杀”作为实现政治目的的合法性和道德性的伦理问题。为了更大的事业而夺去生命是否永远是正当的？这个问题在学者、政治家和公众之间引发了持续的辩论。“刺杀”的心理影响同样不容忽视。领导人的突然离世可能导致社会的混乱和不确定性。例如，1963年约翰·F·肯尼迪总统被刺杀，使美国公众感到震惊和哀悼。这种情绪反应可能导致安全措施的增加和政策的变化，因为政府努力保护其领导人和公民。此外，“刺杀”有时也可以成为变革的催化剂。在某些情况下，领导人的死亡可以激励运动或革命。例如，2007年巴基斯坦前总理贝娜齐尔·布托的刺杀，引发了广泛的抗议和改革呼声。公民们团结起来，要求公正和问责，表明“刺杀”这一行为可以动员人民并带来社会变革。总之，“刺杀”这一概念复杂而多面。它提醒我们生命的脆弱和政治意识形态的力量。虽然有时它可能被视为一种有效的手段，但“刺杀”的后果往往是不可预测和深远的。当我们反思历史事件和当代问题时，考虑这些行为的道德含义至关重要，并努力寻找和平解决冲突的方法，而不是诉诸暴力。理解“刺杀”的严重性使我们能够珍视生命的价值和对话的重要性，而不是在一个常常受到分裂和冲突困扰的世界中。