monarchy

简明释义

英[ˈmɒnəki]美[ˈmɑːnərkiˌˈmɑːnɑːrki]

n. 君主国；君主政体，君主制；皇室，王族

复 数 m o n a r c h i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1."It's been the longest period of stability and prosperity in Spain ever in a parliamentary monarchy," the king said.

“这是西班牙议会君主制期间持续时间最长的稳定繁荣时期。”国王说道。

2.The mystique surrounding the monarchy has gone for ever.

王室的神秘性已经一去不复返。

3.Only tiny Swaziland is still an absolute monarchy.

只有小国斯威士兰依旧是个完全君主制国家。

4.The monarchy has to create a balance between its public and private lives.

王室不得不在公众生活和私生活之间建立一种平衡。

5.I have sworn an oath of loyalty to the monarchy.

我已经发誓效忠君主制。

6.Artists have been allowed to gleefully satirise the monarchy for centuries.

几个世纪以来，艺术家都被允许欢快地讽刺君主制。

7.The power of the monarchy was circumscribed by the new law.

君主统治的权力受到了新法律的制约。

8.The wedding won't save them. Nor will it save the British monarchy.

婚礼救不了他们，也救不了英国的君主制。

9.In a monarchy, the head of state is usually a king or queen.

在君主制中，国家元首通常是国王或女王。

10.Some countries have transitioned from a monarchy to a republic.

一些国家已经从君主制过渡到共和国。

11.The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy, where the Queen has limited powers.

英国是一个宪政君主制国家，女王的权力有限。

12.The monarchy plays a ceremonial role in many nations.

君主制在许多国家中扮演着礼仪性的角色。

13.Many people believe that a monarchy can provide stability in government.

许多人认为君主制可以为政府提供稳定性。

作文

The concept of monarchy has been a significant aspect of human civilization for centuries. A monarchy is a form of government where a single person rules as the head of state, often for life and by hereditary right. This system of governance can be found in various cultures around the world, each with its own unique traditions and practices. In this essay, I will explore the advantages and disadvantages of monarchy, as well as its relevance in modern society.One of the primary advantages of a monarchy is the stability it can provide. Monarchs often symbolize national unity and continuity, serving as a figurehead who represents the nation’s history and culture. For example, in the United Kingdom, Queen Elizabeth II was a symbol of resilience during challenging times, such as World War II and various political crises. Her presence provided a sense of stability and reassurance to the citizens.Moreover, monarchy can foster a sense of identity and pride among the populace. The royal family often engages in charitable work and public service, which can enhance their image and strengthen community ties. Events such as royal weddings and public celebrations can bring people together, creating a shared sense of belonging and collective memory.However, there are also significant drawbacks to the monarchy system. One major criticism is that it can perpetuate inequality and social stratification. The idea that one individual is born into power while others are not raises questions about fairness and meritocracy. In many cases, monarchs may not possess the skills or knowledge necessary to govern effectively, leading to poor decision-making and governance.Additionally, monarchy can be seen as an outdated institution in a modern democratic world. Many argue that hereditary rule is incompatible with the principles of democracy, which emphasize equality and the right of individuals to choose their leaders. Countries like France and Russia have abolished their monarchies in favor of republican systems, reflecting a shift towards more egalitarian forms of governance.In recent years, some monarchies have adapted to modern expectations by becoming constitutional rather than absolute. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution or laws, and they often serve primarily as ceremonial figures while elected officials handle governance. Countries like Sweden and Japan exemplify this model, where the monarchy retains cultural significance without wielding substantial political power.In conclusion, the concept of monarchy continues to evoke diverse opinions and debates. While it can provide stability and foster national identity, it also raises concerns about inequality and democratic values. As societies evolve, the role of monarchy must be reevaluated to ensure it aligns with contemporary ideals of governance and representation. Ultimately, whether one supports or opposes monarchy, it remains an integral part of our historical narrative and cultural identity, shaping the way we understand leadership and authority today.

“君主制”这一概念在数世纪以来一直是人类文明的重要组成部分。君主制是一种政府形式，其中一个人作为国家元首统治，通常终身并继承权。这种治理体系可以在世界各地的各种文化中找到，每种文化都有其独特的传统和实践。在这篇文章中，我将探讨君主制的优缺点，以及它在现代社会中的相关性。君主制的主要优点之一是它所能提供的稳定性。君主往往象征着国家的团结和延续，作为代表国家历史和文化的象征。例如，在英国，伊丽莎白二世女王在艰难时期（如第二次世界大战和各种政治危机）中是韧性的象征。她的存在为公民提供了稳定感和安慰。此外，君主制可以在民众中培养一种身份感和自豪感。皇室家族通常参与慈善工作和公共服务，这可以增强他们的形象并加强社区联系。诸如皇室婚礼和公共庆祝活动等事件可以将人们聚集在一起，创造共享的归属感和集体记忆。然而，君主制系统也有显著的缺点。一个主要的批评是，它可能会延续不平等和社会分层。一个人出生于权力之中而其他人则不然的想法引发了关于公平和精英制度的问题。在许多情况下，君主可能没有治理所需的技能或知识，导致决策不当和治理不善。此外，君主制在现代民主世界中可能被视为过时的制度。许多人认为，世袭统治与强调平等和个人选择领导者权利的民主原则不相容。像法国和俄罗斯这样的国家已经废除了他们的君主制，转而采用共和制度，反映出向更平等治理形式的转变。近年来，一些君主制通过成为宪政君主制而适应现代期望。在宪政君主制中，君主的权力受到宪法或法律的限制，他们通常主要作为礼仪性人物，而由选举产生的官员处理治理事务。瑞典和日本等国家就是这种模式的典范，君主保留了文化意义，而没有行使实质性的政治权力。总之，君主制的概念继续引发各种意见和辩论。虽然它可以提供稳定性并促进国家认同，但它也引发了对不平等和民主价值观的担忧。随着社会的发展，必须重新评估君主制的角色，以确保其与当代治理和代表的理想相一致。最终，无论一个人支持还是反对君主制，它仍然是我们历史叙事和文化认同的重要组成部分，塑造了我们今天对领导和权威的理解。