defensibly

简明释义

[dɪˈfɛnsəbli][dɪˈfɛnsəbli]

adv. 可防御地;可辩护地;可保卫地

英英释义

In a manner that can be justified or defended, especially in a logical or rational way.

以可以被证明或辩护的方式,特别是在逻辑或理性方面。

单词用法

defensibly positioned

合理定位

defensibly argued

可以辩护的论点

defensibly sound

有辩护依据的

defensibly justified

有合理依据的

同义词

justifiably

可以辩护地

The decision to implement the policy was justifiably made based on the data.

实施该政策的决定是基于数据可以辩护的。

supportably

可支持地

Her actions were supportably defended during the meeting.

她的行为在会议上得到了可支持的辩护。

excusably

可以原谅地

He felt that his absence from the event was excusably due to unforeseen circumstances.

他觉得自己缺席活动是由于不可预见的情况,可以原谅。

反义词

indefensibly

不可辩护地

His actions were indefensibly reckless.

他的行为是不可辩护的鲁莽。

unjustifiably

无正当理由地

The decision was unjustifiably harsh.

这个决定无正当理由地严厉。

例句

1.The firm says marketers would do better to build a defensibly large market position in one city.

该公司表示,营销人员最好在一个城市建立一个可防御的大型市场地位。

2.The firm says marketers would do better to build a defensibly large market position in one city.

该公司表示,营销人员最好在一个城市建立一个可防御的大型市场地位。

3.He felt that his decision to leave the job was defensibly justified by the lack of growth opportunities.

他认为自己离开工作的决定因缺乏成长机会而是合理辩护的。

4.In a heated debate, she presented her points defensibly, making it hard for her opponents to counter.

在激烈的辩论中,她的观点被合理辩护地提出,使对手很难反驳。

5.The lawyer argued that the client's actions were taken defensibly in the context of self-defense.

律师辩称,客户的行为在自卫的背景下是合理辩护的。

6.The scientist's conclusions were drawn defensibly from the data collected during the experiment.

科学家的结论是根据实验中收集的数据合理辩护得出的。

7.The company maintained that their pricing strategy was set defensibly based on market research.

公司坚持认为他们的定价策略是基于市场调研而合理辩护的。

作文

In today's world, the concept of truth is often challenged by various perspectives and interpretations. This complexity makes it essential to approach arguments and statements with a critical mind. One way to establish credibility in our arguments is to present them *defensibly*—that is, in a manner that can withstand scrutiny and challenge. To argue *defensibly* means that we provide solid evidence, logical reasoning, and a clear framework for our claims. For instance, consider the debate surrounding climate change. Advocates for environmental protection often face opposition from skeptics who question the validity of scientific consensus. In this context, it becomes crucial for environmentalists to articulate their points *defensibly* by citing reputable studies, presenting statistical data, and addressing counterarguments. By doing so, they not only strengthen their position but also foster a more informed dialogue. Moreover, the importance of being able to argue *defensibly* extends beyond environmental issues. In discussions about social justice, economic policies, or public health, the ability to back up claims with facts and reasoned arguments is vital. For example, when discussing the need for universal healthcare, proponents must address concerns regarding funding and accessibility. By presenting their case *defensibly*—perhaps by comparing healthcare outcomes in countries with universal systems versus those without—they can effectively communicate the benefits of their proposal. However, arguing *defensibly* is not solely about presenting data; it also involves understanding the audience and anticipating their objections. A successful argument acknowledges potential weaknesses and addresses them head-on. This proactive approach not only demonstrates confidence but also enhances the overall persuasiveness of the argument. In academic writing, the principle of arguing *defensibly* is paramount. Scholars are expected to support their hypotheses with empirical research and to engage with existing literature critically. This rigorous approach not only advances knowledge but also ensures that conclusions drawn are robust and reliable. For instance, a researcher studying the effects of a new drug must provide comprehensive evidence from clinical trials, as well as discuss any limitations of their study, to present their findings *defensibly*. In conclusion, the ability to argue *defensibly* is an invaluable skill in both personal and professional contexts. It allows individuals to communicate their ideas effectively while fostering respect and understanding among differing viewpoints. As we navigate an increasingly complex world, embracing the practice of arguing *defensibly* can lead to more productive conversations and ultimately contribute to a more informed society.

在当今世界,真相的概念常常受到各种观点和解释的挑战。这种复杂性使得以批判的思维方式来处理论点和陈述变得至关重要。建立我们论点可信度的一种方法是以*defensibly*的方式呈现它们——即以一种能够经受审查和挑战的方式。以*defensibly*的方式进行论证意味着我们提供了坚实的证据、逻辑推理和清晰的框架来支持我们的主张。例如,考虑气候变化的辩论。环境保护的倡导者常常面临来自怀疑者的反对,他们质疑科学共识的有效性。在这种情况下,环境主义者以*defensibly*的方式阐述自己的观点变得至关重要,他们可以引用可靠的研究、呈现统计数据并回应反对意见。通过这样做,他们不仅加强了自己的立场,还促进了更为知情的对话。此外,能够以*defensibly*的方式进行论证的重要性超越了环境问题。在关于社会正义、经济政策或公共卫生的讨论中,能够用事实和合理的论证来支持主张至关重要。例如,在讨论全民医疗保健的必要性时,支持者必须解决有关资金和可及性的问题。通过以*defensibly*的方式呈现他们的案例——也许通过比较拥有全民医疗系统与没有全民医疗系统的国家的医疗结果——他们可以有效地传达其提案的益处。然而,以*defensibly*的方式进行论证不仅仅是关于呈现数据;它还涉及理解听众并预见他们的反对意见。成功的论证承认潜在的弱点并直接应对它们。这种主动的方法不仅展示了信心,还增强了论证的整体说服力。在学术写作中,以*defensibly*的原则至关重要。学者们需要用实证研究来支持他们的假设,并批判性地与现有文献进行互动。这种严格的方法不仅推动了知识的发展,还确保得出的结论是稳健和可靠的。例如,一位研究新药效果的研究人员必须提供来自临床试验的全面证据,并讨论他们研究的任何局限性,以*defensibly*的方式呈现他们的发现。总之,能够以*defensibly*的方式进行论证是一项在个人和职业环境中都极其宝贵的技能。它使个人能够有效地沟通他们的想法,同时在不同观点之间促进尊重和理解。随着我们在一个日益复杂的世界中航行,拥抱以*defensibly*的方式进行论证的做法可以导致更富有成效的对话,并最终有助于一个更加知情的社会。