vulgarize

简明释义

英[ˈvʌlɡəraɪz]美[ˈvʌlɡəraɪz]

vt. 使通俗化；使庸俗化

第 三 人 称 单 数 v u l g a r i z e s

现 在 分 词 v u l g a r i z i n g

过 去 式 v u l g a r i z e d

过 去 分 词 v u l g a r i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Localization does not necessarily mean that to vulgarize it, so its better to stick to high-end line.

本地化并不一定表示要庸俗化吧，与其这样还不如坚持走高端路线。

2.We review the recent academic discussion of the medical vulgarize, and raise the different concepts about pre-science, science, pseudoscience and counter-science.

简要回顾几年来关于医学庸俗化的学术讨论，明确提出应从本质上对前科学、科学、伪科学和反科学这四个相关概念加以区分。

3.All of us who professionally use the mass media are the shapers of society. We can vulgarize that society.

我们这些专业运用大众媒介的人都是社会的形塑者。

4.In fact, the medical vulgarize includes the social phenomenas of the pseudoscience and counter-science, both of them are inter-contacted and different each other.

医学庸俗化现象事实上包括伪科学和反科学两种既相联系、又相区别的社会现象。

5.In fact, the medical vulgarize includes the social phenomenas of the pseudoscience and counter-science, both of them are inter-contacted and different each other.

医学庸俗化现象事实上包括伪科学和反科学两种既相联系、又相区别的社会现象。

6.Some critics argue that reality TV vulgarizes the concept of entertainment.

一些评论家认为，真人秀节目使娱乐的概念庸俗化。

7.By using slang in his speech, he vulgarized the seriousness of the topic.

通过在演讲中使用俚语，他使主题的严肃性庸俗化。

8.They feared that the commercialization of art would vulgarize its true value.

他们担心艺术的商业化会使其真正价值庸俗化。

9.The professor warned that simplifying complex theories could vulgarize the original ideas.

教授警告说，简化复杂理论可能会使原始思想庸俗化。

10.He felt that the media often vulgarizes important cultural discussions.

他觉得媒体经常使重要的文化讨论庸俗化。

作文

In today’s fast-paced world, the dissemination of information has become easier than ever. However, this ease of access also comes with a downside: the potential to vulgarize complex ideas. To vulgarize means to simplify or distort something, often to the point where it loses its original meaning or significance. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the realm of social media, where nuanced discussions can be reduced to catchy sound bites that lack depth and understanding. Take, for instance, the topic of climate change. While it is a critical issue that requires serious attention and informed debate, many online discussions tend to vulgarize the subject by focusing on sensational headlines rather than scientific facts. This oversimplification can lead to misunderstandings among the public, fostering either apathy or extreme reactions without a proper grasp of the underlying science. Moreover, the tendency to vulgarize extends beyond environmental issues. In the field of politics, complex policies are often boiled down to slogans that resonate emotionally but lack factual accuracy. For example, during election campaigns, candidates may vulgarize their opponents’ platforms to make them seem more extreme or unpalatable, thus swaying public opinion through fear rather than informed debate. The consequences of vulgarizing important topics can be detrimental to society. When people are presented with oversimplified narratives, they may find it challenging to engage in meaningful discussions or make informed decisions. This can lead to polarization, where individuals become entrenched in their views and less willing to consider alternative perspectives. Education plays a crucial role in combating the tendency to vulgarize. By encouraging critical thinking and media literacy, we can help individuals discern between well-researched information and oversimplified narratives. Schools and universities should emphasize the importance of delving deeper into subjects rather than accepting surface-level explanations. This approach not only enriches students' understanding but also equips them to challenge the vulgarization of knowledge in their everyday lives. Furthermore, individuals must take personal responsibility for their consumption of information. It is essential to seek out reputable sources and engage with content that presents multiple viewpoints. By doing so, we can resist the urge to vulgarize our understanding of complex issues and instead foster a culture of informed discourse. In conclusion, while the simplification of information can make it more accessible, we must be cautious of the dangers of vulgarizing important topics. Striking a balance between accessibility and depth is vital for fostering a well-informed society. As we navigate through an era of rapid information exchange, let us strive to engage with ideas in their full complexity, resisting the allure of oversimplification.

在当今快节奏的世界中，信息传播变得比以往任何时候都容易。然而，这种获取信息的便利也带来了一个缺点：可能会将复杂的思想进行通俗化。通俗化意味着简化或扭曲某些东西，常常使其失去原有的意义或重要性。这一现象在社交媒体领域尤为明显，在这里，细致的讨论可能被简化为缺乏深度和理解的吸引眼球的口号。例如，气候变化这一主题。虽然这是一个需要认真关注和深入辩论的重要问题，但许多在线讨论往往通过关注耸人听闻的标题而通俗化这一主题，而非科学事实。这种过度简化可能导致公众产生误解，造成冷漠或极端反应，而没有正确理解潜在的科学。此外，通俗化的倾向超出了环境问题。在政治领域，复杂的政策常常被压缩成情感共鸣但缺乏事实准确性的口号。例如，在选举活动中，候选人可能会通俗化对手的平台，使其看起来更极端或令人无法接受，从而通过恐惧而非知情辩论来影响公众舆论。通俗化重要话题的后果对社会可能是有害的。当人们面对过于简化的叙述时，他们可能会发现很难参与有意义的讨论或做出明智的决定。这可能导致极化，使个人在观点上变得固执，减少考虑替代观点的意愿。教育在应对通俗化的倾向中发挥着至关重要的作用。通过鼓励批判性思维和媒体素养，我们可以帮助个人辨别经过良好研究的信息与过于简化的叙述之间的区别。学校和大学应强调深入探讨主题的重要性，而不是接受表面层次的解释。这种方法不仅丰富了学生的理解，还使他们能够在日常生活中挑战知识的通俗化。此外，个人必须对信息的消费承担个人责任。寻求可靠来源和接触呈现多种观点的内容是至关重要的。通过这样做，我们可以抵制通俗化我们对复杂问题理解的冲动，反而促进一种知情的讨论文化。总之，尽管信息的简化可以使其更易于获取，但我们必须警惕通俗化重要话题的危险。在可获取性和深度之间取得平衡，对于培养一个知识渊博的社会至关重要。当我们在快速信息交流的时代中航行时，让我们努力以完整的复杂性参与思想，抵制过度简化的诱惑。