cloture

简明释义

英[ˈkləʊtʃə(r)]美[ˈkloʊtʃər]

n. 讨论终结

v. 结束辩论

第 三 人 称 单 数 c l o t u r e s

现 在 分 词 c l o t u r i n g

过 去 式 c l o t u r e d

过 去 分 词 c l o t u r e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The senator called for a cloture to end the filibuster on the proposed bill.

参议员要求进行结束辩论以终止对提议法案的冗长辩论。

2.The use of cloture is a powerful tool in the legislative process.

在立法过程中，使用结束辩论是一种强有力的工具。

3.A successful cloture motion requires a three-fifths majority in the Senate.

成功的结束辩论动议需要参议院三分之二的多数支持。

4.The opposition party criticized the ruling party's use of cloture as undemocratic.

反对党批评执政党使用结束辩论程序是不民主的。

5.After hours of debate, the majority party decided to invoke cloture to move forward with the vote.

经过数小时的辩论，执政党决定启动结束辩论程序以推进投票。

作文

In the world of politics, the term cloture refers to a procedure used in legislative bodies to bring an end to a debate and proceed to a vote. This mechanism is crucial for maintaining order in discussions that can often become lengthy and contentious. Without cloture procedures, debates could stretch indefinitely, preventing important legislation from being passed. Understanding how cloture works is essential for anyone interested in the political process, as it highlights the balance between free speech and the need for efficiency in governance.The concept of cloture originated in the early 20th century and has become a fundamental aspect of parliamentary procedure in many democratic nations. In the United States Senate, for example, invoking cloture requires a supermajority vote, specifically three-fifths of the Senate. This means that at least 60 out of 100 senators must agree to end the debate. This requirement ensures that a significant number of representatives support moving forward with the legislation, reflecting the importance of consensus in democratic processes.One of the most notable aspects of cloture is its role in the context of filibusters. A filibuster is a tactic used by senators to prolong debate and delay or prevent a vote on a bill. By speaking for extended periods, senators can effectively hold the floor and block legislation. However, the threat of cloture serves as a counterbalance to this tactic. If a sufficient number of senators wish to proceed with a vote, they can invoke cloture, thereby limiting further debate and forcing a decision.The use of cloture can often be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it allows the legislative process to move forward, ensuring that important issues are addressed in a timely manner. On the other hand, critics argue that it can stifle debate and limit the voices of minority opinions within the legislature. The tension between these two perspectives is a central theme in discussions about the effectiveness of legislative bodies.In recent years, the debate surrounding cloture has intensified, particularly in the context of highly polarized political environments. As parties become more divided, the invocation of cloture has increased, leading to concerns about the erosion of thorough debate and deliberation. Some lawmakers advocate for reforming the cloture process to ensure that it does not undermine the democratic principles of discussion and representation.Furthermore, the implications of cloture extend beyond the walls of legislative chambers. The decisions made through the cloture process can have significant impacts on public policy and the lives of citizens. Therefore, understanding cloture is not just important for politicians but also for voters who want to engage with the political process and understand how their representatives make decisions.In conclusion, cloture is a vital procedural tool in legislative bodies that facilitates the transition from debate to decision-making. While it serves to streamline the legislative process, it also raises important questions about the nature of democracy and the value of open discussion. For anyone interested in politics, grasping the nuances of cloture is essential for a comprehensive understanding of how laws are made and how representative democracy functions.

在政治世界中，术语cloture指的是一种在立法机构中用于结束辩论并进行投票的程序。这一机制对于维护讨论的秩序至关重要，因为讨论往往会变得漫长和有争议。如果没有cloture程序，辩论可能会无限期地延续，阻止重要立法的通过。理解cloture的运作方式对任何对政治过程感兴趣的人来说都是必要的，因为它突显了言论自由与高效治理之间的平衡。cloture的概念起源于20世纪初，并已成为许多民主国家议会程序的基本组成部分。例如，在美国参议院，启动cloture需要超多数票，具体来说是三分之五的参议员支持。这意味着至少60名参议员必须同意结束辩论。这一要求确保了相当数量的代表支持推进立法，反映出在民主过程中达成共识的重要性。cloture最引人注目的方面之一是它在阻挠战中的作用。阻挠战是一种由参议员使用的策略，通过延长辩论时间来推迟或阻止对一项法案的投票。通过长时间发言，参议员可以有效地占据发言权并阻碍立法。然而，cloture的威胁作为这一策略的制衡。如果足够数量的参议员希望继续投票，他们可以启动cloture，从而限制进一步的辩论并迫使作出决定。cloture的使用往往是一把双刃剑。一方面，它允许立法过程向前推进，确保重要问题及时得到解决。另一方面，批评者认为，这可能压制辩论，限制立法机构内少数意见的表达。这两种观点之间的紧张关系是关于立法机构有效性的讨论中的一个核心主题。近年来，围绕cloture的辩论加剧，特别是在高度两极化的政治环境中。随着政党之间的分歧加大，启动cloture的频率增加，引发了对彻底辩论和审议侵蚀的担忧。一些立法者提倡改革cloture程序，以确保其不会破坏讨论和代表的民主原则。此外，cloture的影响不仅限于立法机构的墙壁内。通过cloture程序做出的决定可能对公共政策和公民生活产生重大影响。因此，理解cloture不仅对政治家重要，对希望参与政治过程并理解其代表如何做出决策的选民也至关重要。总之，cloture是立法机构中一种重要的程序工具，促进了从辩论到决策的过渡。虽然它有助于简化立法过程，但也提出了关于民主本质和开放讨论价值的重要问题。对于任何对政治感兴趣的人来说，掌握cloture的细微差别对于全面理解法律是如何制定的以及代议制民主如何运作至关重要。