bibliolatry

简明释义

英[ˌbɪblɪˈɒlətri]美[ˌbɪbliˈɑːlətri]

n. 圣经崇拜；书籍崇拜

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In general, bibliolatry cultural system consists of some cultural elements such as god idea, rite of offering sacrifices to the gods, taboo and so on.

典籍崇拜文化丛由神灵观念、祭祀仪式、禁忌等文化元素所组成。

2.In general, bibliolatry cultural system consists of some cultural elements such as god idea, rite of offering sacrifices to the gods, taboo and so on.

典籍崇拜文化丛由神灵观念、祭祀仪式、禁忌等文化元素所组成。

3.In some religious circles, bibliolatry can lead to a rigid interpretation of texts.

在某些宗教圈子里，崇拜书籍可能导致对文本的僵化解释。

4.Many scholars argue that bibliolatry is detrimental to the true spirit of learning.

许多学者认为崇拜书籍对学习的真正精神是有害的。

5.Some people exhibit bibliolatry by treating every book as infallible.

一些人表现出崇拜书籍的特征，把每本书都视为无误的。

6.Critics of bibliolatry believe that it stifles creativity and independent thought.

反对崇拜书籍的人认为这会扼杀创造力和独立思考。

7.The teacher warned against bibliolatry, encouraging students to think critically about their sources.

老师警告不要陷入崇拜书籍的误区，鼓励学生批判性地思考他们的资料。

作文

In today's society, the relationship between individuals and books has evolved significantly. While books have always been a source of knowledge and inspiration, there is a growing concern about the phenomenon known as bibliolatry. This term refers to an excessive reverence for books, often treating them as objects of worship rather than tools for learning and understanding. The dangers of bibliolatry are manifold, as it can lead to a distorted view of literature and knowledge itself.Firstly, bibliolatry can create a barrier between readers and the content of the books they hold dear. When people idolize books to the point of worshipping them, they may become more focused on the physical object rather than the ideas contained within. This mindset can hinder critical thinking and personal interpretation, as readers might feel compelled to accept the author's perspective without question. In essence, the act of reading transforms from an engaging dialogue into a mere act of reverence.Moreover, bibliolatry can lead to elitism within literary communities. Those who subscribe to this belief may consider certain texts or authors as sacred, thus marginalizing other voices and perspectives. This can stifle diversity in literature and create an environment where only a select few works are celebrated, while countless others are overlooked. Such a narrow focus not only limits readers' exposure to different ideas but also diminishes the richness of the literary landscape.Another significant issue with bibliolatry is its potential to discourage innovation. When literature is viewed through a lens of worship, new ideas and experimental forms may be dismissed as inferior. This can create a stagnant literary culture where only traditional narratives are valued, leaving little room for creativity and evolution. Authors may feel pressured to conform to established norms, resulting in a lack of originality in writing.Furthermore, bibliolatry can manifest in educational settings, where students are taught to revere certain texts without fostering an environment that encourages questioning and exploration. This approach can lead to a generation of readers who are more concerned with the status of a book rather than its relevance or applicability to their lives. Education should empower students to engage with texts critically, allowing them to draw their own conclusions rather than simply absorbing established dogmas.To combat bibliolatry, it is crucial to promote a balanced relationship with literature. Readers should be encouraged to appreciate books for their content and the conversations they inspire, rather than treating them as untouchable relics. Book clubs, discussions, and workshops can foster an atmosphere of inquiry, where individuals feel free to express their thoughts and challenge conventional interpretations.In conclusion, while books are undoubtedly valuable resources, it is essential to avoid falling into the trap of bibliolatry. By recognizing the importance of critical engagement with literature, we can cultivate a richer understanding of the world around us. Embracing diverse voices, encouraging innovation, and fostering open dialogue will ensure that the love for books enhances our lives rather than restricts our thinking. Ultimately, literature should serve as a bridge to knowledge and understanding, not a pedestal for worship.

在当今社会，个人与书籍之间的关系发生了显著变化。虽然书籍一直是知识和灵感的来源，但人们对一种现象的关注日益增加，这种现象被称为bibliolatry。这个词指的是对书籍的过度崇敬，常常将其视为崇拜的对象，而不是学习和理解的工具。bibliolatry的危险是多方面的，因为它可能导致对文学和知识本身的扭曲看法。首先，bibliolatry可能在读者与他们所珍视的书籍内容之间造成障碍。当人们崇拜书籍到崇拜的程度时，他们可能会更关注物理对象，而不是其中包含的思想。这种心态可能会阻碍批判性思维和个人解读，因为读者可能会觉得必须无条件接受作者的观点。实际上，阅读的行为从一个引人入胜的对话转变为单纯的崇敬行为。此外，bibliolatry可能在文学社区内造成精英主义。那些信奉这一信念的人可能会认为某些文本或作者是神圣的，从而边缘化其他声音和观点。这可能会抑制文学的多样性，并创造出一种只有少数几部作品受到赞美的环境，而无数其他作品则被忽视。这种狭隘的关注不仅限制了读者接触不同思想的机会，也减少了文学景观的丰富性。另一个与bibliolatry相关的重要问题是它可能会阻碍创新。当文学通过崇拜的视角来看待时，新思想和实验形式可能会被视为劣等。这可能会导致一种停滞不前的文学文化，在这种文化中，只有传统叙事被重视，几乎没有创造力和演变的空间。作者可能会感到有压力去遵循既定规范，导致写作缺乏原创性。此外，bibliolatry可能在教育环境中表现出来，在这些环境中，学生被教导要崇敬某些文本，而不是营造鼓励质疑和探索的氛围。这种方法可能会导致一代读者更加关注一本书的地位，而不是其与自己生活的相关性或适用性。教育应该赋予学生批判性地与文本互动的能力，让他们得出自己的结论，而不仅仅是吸收既定的教条。为了对抗bibliolatry，促进与文学的平衡关系至关重要。应该鼓励读者欣赏书籍的内容及其激发的对话，而不是将其视为不可触碰的遗物。书友会、讨论会和研讨会可以营造一种探究的氛围，使个人能够自由表达自己的想法并挑战传统的解释。总之，尽管书籍无疑是宝贵的资源，但避免陷入bibliolatry的陷阱至关重要。通过认识到与文学的批判性互动的重要性，我们可以培养对周围世界更丰富的理解。拥抱多样的声音，鼓励创新，促进开放的对话，将确保对书籍的热爱增强我们的生活，而不是限制我们的思维。最终，文学应该作为通往知识和理解的桥梁，而不是崇拜的基座。