misallocation

简明释义

英[ˌmɪsˌæl.əˈkeɪ.ʃən]美[ˌmɪsˌæl.əˈkeɪ.ʃən]

n. 错误的分配，分配不当；不合理分配

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So which was it, misperception, misrepresentation, or misallocation?

那么误读，歪曲，抑或是分配不当到底谁是罪魁祸首呢？

2.The result could only be a massive misallocation of capital.

这只会导致大规模的资金分配不当。

3.But by "picking winners", it risks a huge misallocation of resources if it makes the wrong choice.

但是，这样“挑选赢家”的话，如果选择错误，将会承担巨大的资源分配不当的风险。

4.The allocation of funding to housing, much of which is captured by the economic and social elite, seems a misallocation of scarce resources.

而重建房屋的大部分资金会被经济和社会精英所掌握，这种分配会导致稀缺资源的不当配置。

5.Frances worried this might cause a misallocation of school resources.

在福朗瑟斯担心这件事可能会导致教育资源的分配不当。

6.On the supply side, misallocations slow growth which again leads to monetary easing, more misallocation and still less growth.

在供应侧，错配拉低了增速，进而也导致货币宽松、更多错配和增长更加乏力。

7.The net effect is a misallocation of labor compared to an efficient allocation, and possibly even a reduction in the income received by workers as a whole, including workers in the non-union sectors.

其后果是劳力资源的分配不均衡，而且甚至可能会减少全体工人——无论是联合会工人还是非联合会的工人——的收入。

8.This means huge information loss, and the concomitant possibility that there is a vast misallocation of resources.

这意味着大量的信息失真，随之而来的，有可能造成巨大的资源分配不当。

9.The project failed because of a significant misallocation of time and manpower.

该项目失败是因为时间和人力的严重错误分配。

10.Investors are wary of companies that show signs of misallocation in their capital expenditures.

投资者对那些在资本支出上表现出错误分配迹象的公司持谨慎态度。

11.A misallocation of funds in the education sector can hinder student development and access to quality learning materials.

教育部门的资金错误分配可能会阻碍学生的发展和获取优质学习材料。

12.The company's financial troubles were largely due to the misallocation of resources, leading to inefficiencies.

公司的财务问题主要是由于资源的错误分配，导致了低效率。

13.Government policies often lead to misallocation of public resources, affecting overall economic growth.

政府政策常常导致公共资源的错误分配，影响整体经济增长。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the concept of resource management has become more critical than ever. One of the pressing issues that many economies face is the misallocation of resources. This term refers to the inefficient distribution of resources, leading to suboptimal outcomes in various sectors, including healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Understanding the implications of misallocation is essential for policymakers and stakeholders alike.To illustrate the impact of misallocation, consider the healthcare sector. In many countries, funds are disproportionately allocated to specialized medical services while primary care facilities suffer from underfunding. This misallocation results in long waiting times for patients seeking basic medical attention, ultimately compromising the overall health of the population. When resources are not directed where they are most needed, it can lead to increased healthcare costs and a decline in public health outcomes.Similarly, in the realm of education, misallocation can have dire consequences. Governments may invest heavily in higher education institutions while neglecting primary and secondary schools. This disparity in funding can create a cycle of inequality, where only a fraction of the population has access to quality education. The long-term effects of such a misallocation can stifle economic growth and innovation, as a well-educated workforce is crucial for any nation's development.Infrastructure is another area where misallocation can be detrimental. In many urban areas, significant investments are made in developing luxury housing and commercial spaces, often at the expense of affordable housing and public transportation systems. This misallocation exacerbates social inequalities and contributes to urban sprawl, making it difficult for lower-income individuals to access essential services. Moreover, when public funds are directed towards projects that do not benefit the broader community, it leads to wasted resources and public discontent.Addressing misallocation requires a comprehensive approach. Policymakers must prioritize transparency and accountability in budgeting processes. By ensuring that resources are allocated based on need rather than political influence or short-term gains, governments can mitigate the effects of misallocation. Additionally, engaging communities in decision-making processes can provide valuable insights into where resources are most needed, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility among citizens.Furthermore, data-driven approaches can significantly enhance the efficiency of resource allocation. Utilizing analytics to assess the needs of different sectors allows for a more informed distribution of resources. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments faced challenges in distributing vaccines effectively. Those that employed data analysis to identify high-risk populations and allocate vaccines accordingly were able to minimize the impact of the virus more successfully than those that did not.In conclusion, the misallocation of resources poses significant challenges to societies worldwide. Whether in healthcare, education, or infrastructure, inefficiencies in resource distribution can lead to far-reaching consequences. By prioritizing transparency, community engagement, and data-driven decision-making, we can work towards minimizing misallocation and ensuring that resources are used effectively to benefit all members of society. Only then can we hope to achieve sustainable development and improve the quality of life for everyone.

在当今快速发展的世界中，资源管理的概念变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。许多经济体面临的一个紧迫问题是资源的误分配。这个术语指的是资源的低效分配，导致各个领域（包括医疗、教育和基础设施）出现次优结果。理解误分配的影响对政策制定者和利益相关者而言至关重要。为了说明误分配的影响，考虑医疗行业。在许多国家，资金不成比例地分配给专业医疗服务，而初级医疗设施却遭到资金不足。这种误分配导致患者在寻求基本医疗护理时等待时间过长，最终妨碍了整体人口健康。当资源未能指向最需要的地方时，可能会导致医疗成本上升和公共健康结果下降。同样，在教育领域，误分配也可能产生严重后果。政府可能会在高等教育机构上投入大量资金，而忽视初级和中等学校。这种资金的不平衡可能会造成不平等的循环，只有一小部分人群能够接受优质教育。这种误分配的长期影响可能会抑制经济增长和创新，因为受过良好教育的劳动力对任何国家的发展至关重要。基础设施是另一个误分配可能造成危害的领域。在许多城市地区，大量投资用于开发豪华住房和商业空间，而往往忽视了负担得起的住房和公共交通系统。这种误分配加剧了社会不平等，并助长了城市蔓延，使低收入个人难以获得必要的服务。此外，当公共资金被引导到那些不惠及更广泛社区的项目中时，会导致资源浪费和公众不满。解决误分配问题需要全面的方法。政策制定者必须在预算过程中优先考虑透明度和问责制。通过确保资源根据需求而非政治影响或短期利益进行分配，政府可以减轻误分配的影响。此外，鼓励社区参与决策过程可以为资源最需要的地方提供有价值的见解，增强公民的归属感和责任感。此外，数据驱动的方法可以显著提高资源分配的效率。利用分析来评估不同领域的需求，可以更明智地分配资源。例如，在COVID-19大流行期间，许多政府在有效分配疫苗方面面临挑战。那些利用数据分析识别高风险人群并相应分配疫苗的政府，能够比那些没有这样做的政府更成功地减少病毒的影响。总之，资源的误分配对全球社会构成重大挑战。无论是在医疗、教育还是基础设施领域，资源分配中的低效都可能导致深远的后果。通过优先考虑透明度、社区参与和数据驱动的决策，我们可以努力减少误分配，确保资源有效利用，惠及所有社会成员。只有这样，我们才能希望实现可持续发展，提高每个人的生活质量。