misguided
简明释义
adj. 被误导的
v. 使入歧途(misguide 的过去分词)
英英释义
具有或表现出错误的判断或推理。 | |
在思想或行动上被误导。 |
单词用法
错误的信念 | |
错误的努力 | |
错误的行为 | |
错误的尝试 | |
错误的政策 | |
错误的建议 |
同义词
误导的 | 他被错误的信息所误导。 | ||
错误的 | 她的错误信念导致了糟糕的决策。 | ||
不明智的 | 在没有研究的情况下投资是一个不明智的举动。 | ||
错误引导的 | 这个项目从一开始就被错误引导。 | ||
错误的 | 他的错误假设造成了重大问题。 |
反义词
被引导的 | 在他的职业生涯中,他一直受到有经验的导师的引导。 | ||
被告知的 | 她基于充分的研究做出了明智的决定。 | ||
正确的 | The team developed a correct strategy to tackle the problem. | 团队制定了一个正确的策略来解决这个问题。 |
例句
1.Although these educators may have good intentions their advice to families is misguided, and it stems from misunderstandings about the process of language acquisition.
虽然这些教育者的意图可能是好的,但他们对家庭的建议是错误的,这是源于对语言习得过程的误解。
2."It's overwhelmingly true that the case is misguided," he said.
“事实无法抗拒,这个案子误入歧途,”他说。
3.Critics, claim Coffin, are misguided.
考芬宣称那些批评者在误导人们。
4.Based on today's socioeconomic trends, this hope is, unfortunately, misguided.
不幸的是,基于当今的社会经济趋势,这种希望是错误的。
5.Self-imposed sleeplessness has "become a bit of a status symbol", says Taylor, a misguided measure to prove how powerful and productive you are.
泰勒说,自我强加的失眠“在某种程度上已经成为一种地位的象征”, 用这种方法来证明自己有多么强大和高效是具有误导性的。
6.I think that's really a misguided objection.
我想这真是一个有误导性的反驳。
7.Such criticism is misguided.
这种批评是一种误导。
8.The article presents these proposals as misguided.
文章把这些提案评为误导的产物。
这是极大的误导。
10.His misguided loyalty to a toxic friend caused him a lot of pain.
他对一个有毒朋友的误导的忠诚给他带来了很多痛苦。
11.His misguided efforts to help only made the situation worse.
他误导的帮助努力只让情况变得更糟。
12.She had misguided beliefs about the effectiveness of the new policy.
她对新政策的有效性有误导的信念。
13.The team's misguided strategy led to their defeat in the championship.
团队的误导的策略导致他们在冠军赛中失败。
14.Many people have misguided notions about climate change.
许多人对气候变化有误导的观念。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, it is easy for individuals and groups to become misguided (误导的) in their beliefs and actions. This phenomenon can be observed across various aspects of life, including politics, education, and social issues. Understanding the reasons behind these misguided (误导的) perceptions is crucial for fostering a more informed and rational society.One of the primary reasons people become misguided (误导的) is the overwhelming amount of information available in the digital age. With the rise of social media, everyone has a platform to share their thoughts, regardless of their expertise or knowledge on a subject. This democratization of information can lead to the spread of falsehoods and conspiracy theories. For instance, during public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation about the virus and vaccines proliferated online, causing many to adopt misguided (误导的) views that jeopardized public health efforts.Furthermore, cognitive biases play a significant role in how individuals process information. People tend to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs while ignoring evidence that contradicts them. This confirmation bias can cause a person to become increasingly misguided (误导的) over time, as they surround themselves with like-minded individuals and echo chambers. In political contexts, this often results in polarization, where opposing sides become so entrenched in their views that they fail to engage in constructive dialogue. The inability to consider alternative perspectives can lead to misguided (误导的) policies that do not address the needs of the broader population.Education also plays a critical role in combating misguided (误导的) beliefs. A robust educational system encourages critical thinking and equips students with the skills necessary to evaluate information critically. However, when education systems are underfunded or focused solely on rote memorization, students may leave school without the tools needed to discern fact from fiction. This lack of critical thinking skills can lead to a generation that is easily swayed by misguided (误导的) narratives and propaganda.Moreover, emotional appeals often overshadow logical reasoning in public discourse. Politicians and activists frequently use emotive language to connect with their audience, which can lead to misguided (误导的) conclusions based on feelings rather than facts. For example, during elections, candidates may exploit fears or hopes to rally support, even if their proposed solutions are not grounded in reality. This tactic can create a populace that is driven by emotions, resulting in decisions that are misguided (误导的) and potentially harmful.To address the issue of misguided (误导的) beliefs, individuals must take personal responsibility for their information consumption. This involves seeking out credible sources, engaging in discussions with those who hold differing views, and remaining open to changing one's mind when presented with new evidence. Additionally, society as a whole must prioritize media literacy and critical thinking in education to prepare future generations to navigate the complexities of information in the modern world.In conclusion, the prevalence of misguided (误导的) beliefs in our society is a multifaceted issue that stems from the abundance of information, cognitive biases, educational shortcomings, and emotional appeals. By recognizing these factors and actively working to counteract them, we can cultivate a more informed and rational society. It is essential to promote critical thinking and open dialogue to prevent the spread of misguided (误导的) ideas and to ensure that our collective decision-making is based on sound reasoning and factual evidence.
在当今快节奏的世界中,个人和团体很容易在他们的信念和行动上变得misguided(误导的)。这种现象可以在生活的各个方面观察到,包括政治、教育和社会问题。理解这些misguided(误导的)看法背后的原因对于促进一个更为知情和理性的社会至关重要。人们成为misguided(误导的)的主要原因之一是数字时代信息量的过载。随着社交媒体的兴起,每个人都有平台分享他们的想法,无论他们在某个主题上的专业知识或知识如何。这种信息的民主化可能导致谣言和阴谋论的传播。例如,在公共卫生危机期间,如COVID-19大流行,关于病毒和疫苗的错误信息在网上传播,导致许多人采纳了misguided(误导的)观点,从而危及公共卫生工作。此外,认知偏见在个人处理信息的方式中也起着重要作用。人们倾向于寻找确认自己现有信念的信息,同时忽略与之相矛盾的证据。这种确认偏见可能导致一个人随着时间的推移变得越来越misguided(误导的),因为他们将自己置身于志同道合的人和回音室中。在政治背景下,这通常导致极化,对立双方变得如此固执己见,以至于无法进行建设性的对话。无法考虑替代观点可能导致misguided(误导的)政策,这些政策无法满足更广泛人群的需求。教育在打击misguided(误导的)信念方面也发挥着关键作用。一个强有力的教育系统鼓励批判性思维,并为学生提供必要的技能,以便能够批判性地评估信息。然而,当教育系统资金不足或仅专注于死记硬背时,学生可能会在没有必要工具的情况下离开学校,无法辨别事实与虚构。这种缺乏批判性思维的能力可能导致一代人容易受到misguided(误导的)叙事和宣传的影响。此外,情感诉求常常在公共话语中掩盖逻辑推理。政治家和活动家经常使用情感语言与观众建立联系,这可能导致基于感情而非事实的misguided(误导的)结论。例如,在选举期间,候选人可能利用恐惧或希望来聚集支持,即使他们提出的解决方案并未扎根于现实。这种策略可能导致一个被情感驱动的民众,从而导致的决策是misguided(误导的)且潜在有害。为了应对misguided(误导的)信念的问题,个人必须对他们的信息消费承担个人责任。这涉及到寻找可信来源,与持有不同观点的人进行讨论,并保持开放态度,在新证据出现时愿意改变自己的想法。此外,整个社会必须优先考虑媒体素养和批判性思维在教育中的重要性,以便为未来的几代人准备好导航现代世界的信息复杂性。总之,misguided(误导的)信念在我们社会中的普遍存在是一个多方面的问题,源于信息的丰富性、认知偏见、教育不足和情感诉求。通过认识到这些因素并积极努力加以反制,我们可以培养一个更为知情和理性的社会。促进批判性思维和开放对话对于防止misguided(误导的)思想的传播以及确保我们的集体决策基于合理推理和事实依据至关重要。