logrolling

简明释义

英[ˈlɒɡrəʊlɪŋ]美[ˈlɔːɡroʊlɪŋ]

n. 水上踩滚木；互相吹捧；滚木材；资产阶级政客间互相投赞成票以通过彼此都有利的提案

v. 协力使通过（logroll 的 ing 形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Sims no longer get stuck during logrolling when trying to exit while another is entering.

在进行滚木头游戏时，如果在另一个人加入的时候退出，将不会再被卡住。

2.Sims no longer get stuck during logrolling when trying to exit while another is entering.

在进行滚木头游戏时，如果在另一个人加入的时候退出，将不会再被卡住。

3.The senator's logrolling 互惠交易 strategy helped secure votes for the new healthcare bill.

参议员的 logrolling 互惠交易 策略帮助为新的医疗保健法案确保了投票。

4.In academia, logrolling 互惠交易 can occur when researchers agree to cite each other's work.

在学术界，logrolling 互惠交易 可能发生在研究人员同意引用彼此的工作时。

5.Many states use logrolling 互惠交易 to gain funding for local projects.

许多州使用 logrolling 互惠交易 来获得地方项目的资金。

6.The committee engaged in logrolling 互惠交易 to ensure that everyone's interests were represented.

委员会参与了 logrolling 互惠交易 以确保每个人的利益都得到代表。

7.In politics, logrolling 互惠交易 can help legislators pass bills by exchanging support.

在政治中，logrolling 互惠交易 可以通过交换支持帮助立法者通过法案。

作文

In the realm of political science and legislative processes, the term logrolling refers to the practice where legislators exchange support for each other's proposed legislation. This mutual agreement often occurs when one lawmaker agrees to vote for another's bill in exchange for a similar favor in the future. The concept of logrolling is crucial in understanding how policies are formed and passed in the complex landscape of governance. It reflects the necessity of compromise and collaboration among lawmakers to achieve their individual and collective goals. The origins of logrolling can be traced back to the early days of American politics, where it was common for politicians to engage in this form of reciprocal voting as a means to advance their agendas. For instance, if a senator from one state wants to pass a bill that benefits their constituency, they may seek out support from other senators who have their own legislative priorities. By agreeing to support each other’s bills, they can increase the likelihood of both measures being approved. This practice is not limited to federal legislation; it is also prevalent at state and local levels, where the dynamics of political relationships play a significant role in decision-making.While logrolling can be seen as a pragmatic approach to governance, it also raises ethical questions. Critics argue that this practice can lead to the passage of legislation that may not serve the public interest but rather the interests of a select few who engage in these transactions. Additionally, logrolling can contribute to the proliferation of pork-barrel spending, where funds are allocated to projects primarily to bring money to a representative's district rather than to address broader societal needs. This can result in inefficient use of resources and a lack of accountability in government spending.On the other hand, proponents of logrolling argue that it is a necessary part of the legislative process. They contend that it allows for diverse interests to be represented and ensures that various viewpoints are considered in policymaking. In a democratic system, where numerous stakeholders have different priorities, logrolling can facilitate compromise and lead to more comprehensive and effective legislation. It encourages dialogue and negotiation, ultimately fostering a more collaborative political environment.Moreover, logrolling can enhance the chances of passing significant reforms that might otherwise face opposition. For example, a major infrastructure bill may require support from multiple parties, each with their own specific demands. Through logrolling, lawmakers can negotiate terms that satisfy various interests, thus paving the way for substantial improvements in public services and facilities.In conclusion, while logrolling has its drawbacks, particularly concerning ethical implications and potential inefficiencies, it remains a fundamental aspect of legislative practice. Understanding this concept is essential for analyzing how laws are created and how various interests are balanced within the political arena. As citizens, being aware of logrolling helps us comprehend the complexities of governance and the importance of collaboration in achieving meaningful legislative outcomes.

在政治科学和立法过程中，术语logrolling指的是立法者互相交换对彼此提议的立法支持的做法。这种相互协议通常发生在一位立法者同意投票支持另一位立法者的法案，以换取未来的类似好处。logrolling的概念对于理解政策是如何形成和通过的，以及在复杂的治理环境中立法者之间的妥协与合作的必要性至关重要。logrolling的起源可以追溯到美国政治的早期，当时政治家们常常以这种互惠投票的方式来推进他们的议程。例如，如果一位来自某州的参议员希望通过一项有利于其选区的法案，他们可能会寻求其他拥有自己立法优先事项的参议员的支持。通过同意支持彼此的法案，他们可以增加两项措施获得批准的可能性。这种做法不仅限于联邦立法；在州和地方层面上也很普遍，政治关系的动态在决策中发挥着重要作用。虽然logrolling可以被视为治理的一种务实方法，但它也引发了伦理问题。批评者认为，这种做法可能导致通过不符合公众利益的立法，而是服务于少数参与这些交易的人的利益。此外，logrolling可能助长了“猪肉桶”支出，即资金分配给主要是为了给代表所在选区带来资金的项目，而不是解决更广泛的社会需求。这可能导致资源使用效率低下和政府支出的缺乏问责制。另一方面，logrolling的支持者认为，这是立法过程中的必要组成部分。他们主张这允许多样化的利益得到代表，并确保在政策制定中考虑各种观点。在民主制度中，各种利益相关者有不同的优先事项，logrolling可以促进妥协并导致更全面和有效的立法。它鼓励对话和谈判，最终促进了更具合作性的政治环境。此外，logrolling可以增强通过重大改革的机会，这些改革可能面临反对。例如，一项重大的基础设施法案可能需要多个党派的支持，每个党派都有自己的特定要求。通过logrolling，立法者可以协商满足各种利益的条款，从而为公共服务和设施的重大改善铺平道路。总之，尽管logrolling有其缺点，特别是在伦理影响和潜在低效方面，但它仍然是立法实践的基本方面。理解这一概念对于分析法律是如何制定的以及在政治领域中如何平衡各种利益至关重要。作为公民，了解logrolling有助于我们理解治理的复杂性以及在实现有意义的立法成果中合作的重要性。