unpersuadable

简明释义

英[ˌʌnpəˈsweɪdəb(ə)l]美[ˌʌnpərˈsweɪdəbl]

adj. 说服不了的；坚定不移的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Some person may be unpersuadable.

有些人是无法说服的。

2.Some person may be unpersuadable.

有些人是无法说服的。

3.Even after the apology, he remained unpersuadable 不可说服的 about reconciling.

即使在道歉之后，他仍然对和解是不可说服的。

4.Her unpersuadable 不可说服的 nature often led to heated debates with her friends.

她的不可说服的性格常常导致与朋友们的激烈辩论。

5.The committee found him unpersuadable 不可说服的 when it came to changing the budget.

当涉及到改变预算时，委员会发现他是不可说服的。

6.The teacher found it challenging to teach the unpersuadable 不可说服的 students who refused to listen.

老师发现教那些拒绝倾听的学生是具有挑战性的，因为他们是不可说服的。

7.Despite all the evidence presented, she remained unpersuadable 不可说服的 about her opinions.

尽管呈现了所有证据，她对自己的观点仍然是不可说服的。

作文

In today's world, we often encounter individuals who are remarkably unpersuadable. These people hold steadfast to their beliefs and opinions, regardless of the evidence or arguments presented to them. The phenomenon of being unpersuadable can be both fascinating and frustrating. It raises questions about the nature of belief, the role of reason in decision-making, and the impact of social influences on our thoughts. One of the most striking examples of unpersuadable individuals can be found in political discourse. In heated debates, it is common to see people entrenched in their views, unwilling to consider alternative perspectives. This rigidity can stem from various factors, including personal experiences, cultural backgrounds, and emotional investments in certain ideologies. For instance, during election seasons, supporters of different candidates often display a remarkable level of loyalty and conviction that borders on unpersuadable behavior. They may disregard facts that contradict their candidate's narrative and instead focus on reinforcing their pre-existing beliefs.The challenge of engaging with unpersuadable individuals lies in the difficulty of changing minds that seem impervious to reason. Research in psychology suggests that cognitive dissonance plays a significant role in this phenomenon. When faced with information that contradicts their beliefs, unpersuadable individuals may experience discomfort, leading them to dismiss or rationalize away the conflicting evidence rather than reevaluate their stance. This defense mechanism can create an echo chamber effect, where individuals surround themselves with like-minded peers and media that reinforce their views, further entrenching their unpersuadable nature.Moreover, social identity theory posits that people derive a sense of self from their group affiliations. When an individual's beliefs are closely tied to their social identity, challenging those beliefs can feel like a personal attack. As a result, unpersuadable individuals may become defensive and resistant to change, prioritizing group cohesion over objective reasoning. This dynamic is particularly evident in discussions surrounding contentious issues such as climate change, vaccination, and social justice, where deeply held beliefs often clash.However, it is essential to recognize that not all unpersuadable individuals are lost causes. There are strategies that can foster more productive conversations. Active listening, empathy, and finding common ground can help bridge the gap between differing viewpoints. By approaching discussions with respect and understanding, it may be possible to encourage unpersuadable individuals to reconsider their positions without feeling threatened.In conclusion, the concept of unpersuadable individuals highlights the complexities of human belief systems and the challenges of effective communication. While it can be disheartening to engage with those who refuse to budge from their convictions, understanding the psychological and social factors at play can pave the way for more constructive dialogues. Ultimately, fostering an environment where open-mindedness and critical thinking are valued may help reduce the prevalence of unpersuadable attitudes in society.

在当今世界，我们经常会遇到一些人，他们显得异常不易说服的。这些人坚定地坚持自己的信念和观点，无论面对怎样的证据或论点都不为所动。成为不易说服的现象既令人着迷又令人沮丧。这引发了关于信仰本质、理性在决策中的作用以及社会影响对我们思想的影响等问题。一个最引人注目的例子就是政治话语中的不易说服的个体。在激烈的辩论中，人们常常看到某些人固守自己的观点，拒绝考虑其他视角。这种僵化可能源于多种因素，包括个人经历、文化背景和对某些意识形态的情感投资。例如，在选举季节，不同候选人的支持者常常表现出一种近乎不易说服的忠诚和信念。他们可能会忽视与候选人叙述相矛盾的事实，而专注于强化自己已有的信念。与不易说服的个体互动的挑战在于，改变那些似乎对理性无动于衷的头脑是多么困难。心理学研究表明，认知失调在这一现象中起着重要作用。当面临与其信念相矛盾的信息时，不易说服的个体可能会感到不适，从而选择驳回或合理化矛盾证据，而不是重新评估自己的立场。这种防御机制可能会造成回音室效应，使个体将自己置于志同道合的同伴和媒体中，进一步加深他们的不易说服的特性。此外，社会身份理论指出，人们从群体归属中获得自我认同。当一个人的信念与其社会身份紧密相关时，挑战这些信念可能会被视为个人攻击。因此，不易说服的个体可能会变得防御性，抵制变化，优先考虑群体凝聚力而非客观推理。这种动态在围绕气候变化、疫苗接种和社会正义等争议性问题的讨论中尤为明显，深刻的信念常常发生冲突。然而，必须认识到，并非所有的不易说服的个体都是无可救药的。存在一些策略可以促进更具建设性的对话。积极倾听、同理心和寻找共同点可以帮助弥合不同观点之间的鸿沟。通过尊重和理解的方式进行讨论，可能会鼓励不易说服的个体在不感到威胁的情况下重新考虑自己的立场。总之，不易说服的个体概念突显了人类信仰体系的复杂性以及有效沟通的挑战。尽管与那些拒绝改变信念的人交流可能令人沮丧，但理解心理和社会因素的作用可以为更具建设性的对话铺平道路。最终，营造一个开放思维和批判性思维被重视的环境，可能有助于减少社会中不易说服的态度的普遍性。