bludgeoning

简明释义

英[ˈblʌdʒ(ə)nɪŋ]美[ˈblʌdʒənɪŋ]

用大头棒打，重击（bludgeon 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The personal assistant to former Ramones manager Linda Stein has been convicted in a New York court of bludgeoning her boss to death.

雷蒙斯乐队前经纪人琳达·斯坦的私人助理涉嫌使用棍棒将其上司殴打致死，日前她已在纽约某法庭被定罪。

2.After all, the man wasn't exactly bludgeoning me; he was merely tapping me lightly with his umbrella, not causing any pain at all.

毕竟，这个人不是用棒子打我；他只是在用伞轻轻敲打我的头，根本就不疼。

3.Soldiers systematically killed hundreds of men, women and children, shooting or bludgeoning them to death, and throwing bodies down the well.

士兵们杀掉了数百名男人、女人和孩子，这些人都被射击或者殴打致死。尸体被扔进井里。

4.Soldiers systematically killed hundreds of men, women and children, shooting or bludgeoning them to death, and throwing bodies down the well.

士兵们杀掉了数百名男人、女人和孩子，这些人都被射击或者殴打致死。尸体被扔进井里。

5.Instead of bludgeoning our erring comrades, we should help them with criticism.

对犯错误的同志，要批评帮助，不能一棍子打死。

6.Some monsters are vulnerable to piercing, bludgeoning, or slashing damage. (normally Ex)

某些怪物的弱点是惧怕穿刺、钝击或挥砍伤害。

7.His bludgeoning power and fearsome frame worked in tandem with fast-moving feet.

他强壮的身体力量和可怕的体格，加上移动迅速的脚步。

8.In the debate, one politician resorted to bludgeoning 强迫 his opponent with aggressive arguments instead of rational discussion.

在辩论中，一位政治家选择用激进的论点来强迫对手，而不是理性的讨论。

9.The article criticized the media for bludgeoning 抨击 public figures without proper evidence.

这篇文章批评媒体在没有充分证据的情况下抨击公众人物。

10.During the protest, demonstrators were accused of bludgeoning 打击 police officers who were trying to maintain order.

在抗议活动中，示威者被指控打击试图维持秩序的警察。

11.The detective found evidence of a violent crime, where the victim had been bludgeoning 重击 with a blunt object.

侦探发现了一起暴力犯罪的证据，受害者被一件钝器重击。

12.The coach warned the players against bludgeoning 强行 their way through the defense without strategy.

教练警告球员们不要在没有策略的情况下强行突破防线。

作文

In today's world, the term bludgeoning (重击) can be used metaphorically to describe various forms of aggressive persuasion or coercion that people encounter daily. Whether in politics, social media, or even personal relationships, the act of bludgeoning (重击) someone into submission or compliance has become alarmingly common. This essay will explore how this concept manifests in different areas of life and its implications for society as a whole.First and foremost, political discourse often exemplifies the use of bludgeoning (重击) tactics. Politicians and their supporters frequently resort to aggressive rhetoric to sway public opinion. Instead of engaging in constructive debates, they may resort to character attacks or fear-mongering, effectively bludgeoning (重击) their opponents into silence. This not only stifles healthy dialogue but also creates an environment where misinformation can thrive, as individuals are too intimidated to voice dissenting opinions.Similarly, social media platforms have become breeding grounds for bludgeoning (重击) behavior. Users often find themselves bombarded with aggressive posts or comments meant to shame or intimidate those who disagree. The anonymity provided by the internet allows individuals to engage in bludgeoning (重击) without facing immediate repercussions. As a result, many people feel pressured to conform to popular opinions, fearing backlash or harassment if they dare to express an alternative viewpoint.In personal relationships, bludgeoning (重击) can take on a more subtle form, often manifesting as emotional manipulation. One partner may use guilt or threats to control the other, effectively bludgeoning (重击) them into compliance. This dynamic can create a toxic environment where open communication is stifled, and trust erodes over time. It is crucial for individuals to recognize these patterns and seek healthier ways to resolve conflicts without resorting to coercion.The implications of bludgeoning (重击) behavior extend beyond individual interactions; they can shape societal norms and values. When aggressive tactics become normalized, they can foster a culture of fear and compliance. People may become less willing to engage in critical thinking or challenge the status quo, leading to stagnation in progress and innovation. In contrast, environments that encourage open dialogue and respectful disagreement tend to foster creativity and growth.To combat the pervasive nature of bludgeoning (重击) in our society, it is essential to promote awareness and education around effective communication strategies. Encouraging empathy and understanding can help individuals navigate disagreements without resorting to aggression. Additionally, creating safe spaces for dialogue can empower people to express their opinions freely, reducing the need for bludgeoning (重击) tactics.In conclusion, the concept of bludgeoning (重击) serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of respectful communication in all aspects of life. By recognizing and addressing the ways in which we may inadvertently engage in bludgeoning (重击) behaviors, we can work towards fostering a more inclusive and understanding society. Ultimately, the goal should be to encourage constructive dialogue and collaboration rather than intimidation and coercion.

在当今世界，术语bludgeoning（重击）可以用比喻的方式来描述人们日常生活中遇到的各种形式的激进劝说或强迫。无论是在政治、社交媒体，还是个人关系中，bludgeoning（重击）某人以使其屈服或顺从已经变得越来越普遍。本文将探讨这一概念在生活不同领域中的表现及其对整个社会的影响。首先，政治话语往往体现了使用bludgeoning（重击）策略的情况。政治家及其支持者经常诉诸于激进的言辞来影响公众舆论。与其进行建设性的辩论，他们可能会选择进行人身攻击或制造恐惧，从而有效地使对手沉默。这不仅扼杀了健康的对话，还创造了一个谣言盛行的环境，因为个人因害怕表达异议而受到压制。同样，社交媒体平台已成为bludgeoning（重击）行为的滋生地。用户常常发现自己被激进的帖子或评论轰炸，这些内容旨在羞辱或恐吓那些持不同意见的人。互联网提供的匿名性使个人在参与bludgeoning（重击）时不必面临直接的后果。因此，许多人感到必须遵循流行观点，害怕如果敢于表达替代观点就会遭到反击或骚扰。在个人关系中，bludgeoning（重击）可以采取更微妙的形式，通常表现为情感操控。一方可能利用内疚或威胁来控制另一方，有效地bludgeoning（重击）他们以达到顺从的目的。这种动态可能会创造出一种有毒的环境，在这种环境中，开放的沟通受到压制，信任随着时间的推移而侵蚀。个人必须认识到这些模式，并寻求更健康的方式来解决冲突，而不是诉诸于强迫。bludgeoning（重击）行为的影响超越了个体互动；它们可以塑造社会规范和价值观。当激进策略变得正常化时，它们可能会培育出一种恐惧和服从的文化。人们可能会变得不愿意进行批判性思考或挑战现状，导致停滞不前的发展和创新。相反，鼓励开放对话和尊重异议的环境往往会促进创造力和成长。为了抵制我们社会中普遍存在的bludgeoning（重击），提高意识和教育有效沟通策略至关重要。鼓励同理心和理解可以帮助个人在分歧中找到解决方案，而不诉诸于攻击。此外，创建安全的对话空间可以使人们能够自由表达自己的观点，从而减少对bludgeoning（重击）策略的需求。总之，bludgeoning（重击）的概念提醒我们在生活各个方面尊重沟通的重要性。通过识别和应对我们可能不自觉地参与bludgeoning（重击）行为的方式，我们可以努力营造一个更具包容性和理解的社会。最终，目标应该是鼓励建设性对话和合作，而不是恐吓和强迫。