technocratic

简明释义

英[ˌteknəˈkrætɪk]美[ˌteknəˈkrætɪk]

adj. 技术专家治国论的；技术专家政治论的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Her concern is with the diminishing place given to the liberal arts in many institutions: their marginalization by technocratic and business-oriented demands.6.

她的顾虑是，在很多机构中，因技术统治和商业导向的要求而被边缘化的人文学科所占比重逐渐缩小。

2.Lastly, not impossibly, the shrewd and technocratic Mr Mbeki might stay.

最后，也不是不可能，精明且主张技术统治的姆贝基可能留任。

3.As a former boss of Goldman Sachs, Mr Paulson's street smarts complemented Mr Bernanke's deep historical knowledge of crises and Mr Geithner's technocratic skills.

鲍尔森先生作为高盛前老板的经历让他有很多处世经验，而这正好和伯南克先生对危机深刻的历史见解及盖斯那作为技术专家的技能相得益彰。

4.For all his technocratic brilliance, however, Gamal desperately lacks any hint of a common touch.

除去他的这些技术才华，然而令人失望的是，贾迈勒缺乏任何平易近人的特质。

5.Here, perhaps more than in any other corner of the planet, nature is capable of arousing amazement, bewilderment and fascination, even to the most technocratic of human beings.

和地球的任何地方相比，这里的大自然更能让人类惊奇、困惑、着迷。连那些信奉“技术治国论”的人也不例外。

6.The more technocratic departments could be led by captains of industry or accomplished scientists.

技术要求更高的部门可以由大企业的首脑或卓越的科学家们领导。

7.Many believe that a technocratic 技术官僚的 government can solve complex issues better than traditional politicians.

许多人认为，技术官僚的政府能比传统政治家更好地解决复杂问题。

8.The city implemented a technocratic 技术官僚的 policy to manage its water resources sustainably.

该市实施了一项技术官僚的政策，以可持续地管理其水资源。

9.The new administration adopted a technocratic 技术官僚的 approach to improve economic efficiency.

新政府采用了技术官僚的方法来提高经济效率。

10.Critics argue that technocratic 技术官僚的 solutions often overlook social and ethical implications.

批评者认为，技术官僚的解决方案往往忽视社会和伦理影响。

11.His technocratic 技术官僚的 expertise in engineering made him a valuable asset in the government.

他在工程方面的技术官僚的专业知识使他成为政府的重要资产。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the term technocratic refers to a governance model that emphasizes the role of technical experts and scientific knowledge in decision-making processes. This approach contrasts with traditional political systems where elected officials may rely more on ideology or public opinion rather than empirical data and specialized knowledge. The rise of the technocratic movement can be attributed to the increasing complexity of modern society, where issues such as climate change, technological advancement, and economic inequality require informed and systematic responses. One of the most significant advantages of a technocratic approach is its potential for effective problem-solving. For instance, when addressing environmental challenges, a technocratic government would prioritize policies based on scientific research and data analysis. This could lead to more sustainable practices being implemented, as decisions are made by individuals who understand the intricacies of ecological systems. Additionally, in the realm of public health, a technocratic administration might rely on epidemiologists and medical experts to formulate strategies that effectively combat diseases, rather than depending solely on political agendas.However, the technocratic model is not without its criticisms. Detractors argue that it can lead to a disconnect between policymakers and the general populace. When decisions are made solely by experts, there is a risk that the voices of ordinary citizens may be overlooked. This can create a sense of alienation among the public, who may feel that their needs and opinions are not being considered in the decision-making process. Moreover, the reliance on experts raises questions about accountability and transparency. Who holds these technocrats accountable if their decisions lead to negative outcomes?Furthermore, the technocratic approach can sometimes be perceived as elitist. Critics argue that it prioritizes technical knowledge over other forms of wisdom, such as cultural or ethical considerations. For example, a technocratic solution to social issues might focus on statistical outcomes rather than the lived experiences of individuals affected by those issues. This can result in policies that, while efficient, may lack empathy or fail to address the root causes of problems.Despite these concerns, the relevance of the technocratic model continues to grow in our interconnected world. As we face unprecedented global challenges, the need for informed decision-making has never been more critical. In many cases, the integration of technocratic principles into governance can enhance policy effectiveness and foster innovative solutions. Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a balance between the expertise of technocratic governance and the democratic principles of inclusivity and representation. It is essential to ensure that while we benefit from the insights of experts, we also create avenues for public engagement and dialogue. By doing so, we can harness the strengths of a technocratic approach while mitigating its potential downsides, leading to a more equitable and effective governance system that serves the needs of all citizens.

在当今快速发展的世界中，术语技术官僚指的是一种治理模式，强调技术专家和科学知识在决策过程中的作用。这种方法与传统的政治体系形成对比，在传统体系中，选举官员可能更多依赖意识形态或公众舆论，而不是经验数据和专业知识。技术官僚运动的兴起可以归因于现代社会日益复杂的问题，例如气候变化、技术进步和经济不平等，这些问题需要经过深思熟虑和系统性的回应。 技术官僚方法的一个显著优势是其有效解决问题的潜力。例如，在应对环境挑战时，技术官僚政府将优先考虑基于科学研究和数据分析的政策。这可能会导致更可持续的实践被实施，因为决策是由理解生态系统复杂性的个人做出的。此外，在公共卫生领域，技术官僚政府可能依赖流行病学家和医学专家制定有效抗击疾病的战略，而不仅仅依靠政治议程。然而，技术官僚模型并非没有批评。反对者认为，这可能导致政策制定者与普通公众之间的脱节。当决策完全由专家做出时，普通公民的声音可能被忽视。这可能会在公众中造成一种疏离感，他们可能会觉得自己的需求和意见在决策过程中没有得到考虑。此外，依赖专家引发了问责制和透明度的问题。如果这些技术官僚的决策导致负面结果，谁来追究他们的责任？此外，技术官僚方法有时可能被视为精英主义。批评者认为，它优先考虑技术知识而非其他形式的智慧，例如文化或伦理考量。例如，技术官僚对社会问题的解决方案可能侧重于统计结果，而不是受到这些问题影响的个人的生活经历。这可能导致政策虽然高效，但缺乏同情心或未能解决问题的根本原因。尽管存在这些担忧，技术官僚模型在我们互联的世界中的相关性仍在增长。当我们面临前所未有的全球挑战时，知情决策的需求比以往任何时候都更加重要。在许多情况下，将技术官僚原则融入治理可以增强政策的有效性，并促进创新解决方案。 最终，挑战在于找到技术官僚治理的专业知识与包容性和代表性的民主原则之间的平衡。确保在我们从专家的洞察中受益的同时，也创造公众参与和对话的途径至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以利用技术官僚方法的优势，同时减轻其潜在缺点，从而实现更公平和有效的治理体系，以服务于所有公民的需求。