extort confessions by torture

简明释义

刑讯逼供

英英释义

例句

1.The use of methods that extort confessions by torture has been banned in many countries.

在许多国家，使用酷刑逼供的方法已被禁止。

2.The regime was known to extort confessions by torture, which led to widespread condemnation from human rights organizations.

该政权以酷刑逼供而闻名，这导致人权组织的广泛谴责。

3.In the documentary, victims recounted how police would extort confessions by torture during interrogations.

在纪录片中，受害者讲述了警方在审讯中如何通过酷刑逼供。

4.International law strictly prohibits any practice that extort confessions by torture.

国际法严格禁止任何通过酷刑逼供的做法。

5.Reports revealed that some military units extort confessions by torture to extract information from prisoners.

报告显示，一些军事单位通过酷刑逼供从囚犯那里提取信息。

作文

Throughout history, the use of torture as a means of extracting information has been a deeply controversial and morally repugnant practice. One of the most egregious examples of this is when authorities attempt to extort confessions by torture, a method that not only violates human rights but also undermines the very foundations of justice. In this essay, I will explore the implications of using such brutal tactics, the psychological effects on both the victim and the perpetrator, and the broader societal consequences that arise from this abhorrent practice.The act of extort confessions by torture is not merely a violation of ethical standards; it is a fundamental assault on human dignity. Torture often leads to false confessions, as individuals under extreme physical and psychological duress may say anything to make the pain stop. This raises serious questions about the reliability of information obtained through such means. When confessions are coerced, the judicial process becomes tainted, leading to wrongful convictions and a miscarriage of justice. The integrity of legal systems relies on voluntary and truthful admissions, which torture fundamentally destroys.Moreover, the psychological impact of torture extends beyond the immediate victim. Those who inflict pain may also suffer from long-term psychological effects, including guilt, shame, and desensitization to violence. The normalization of such practices can create a culture of brutality, where empathy and compassion are eroded. This cycle of violence can lead to a society that increasingly accepts inhumane treatment as a legitimate means to an end, further perpetuating a cycle of abuse and suffering.In addition to the individual consequences, the societal implications of using torture as a tool for interrogation are profound. Communities that witness or are aware of the use of torture may develop a deep distrust in their government and legal institutions. This erosion of trust can lead to social unrest, as people feel that their rights and freedoms are being systematically violated. The legitimacy of authority is called into question, and citizens may resort to protests or even violent resistance against a system that they perceive as oppressive.Internationally, the use of torture is condemned and often leads to sanctions and isolation for countries that engage in such practices. The global community recognizes that human rights are universal, and the use of torture undermines international law and norms. Countries that allow the practice of extort confessions by torture risk damaging their standing in the world, facing diplomatic repercussions, and losing aid and support from other nations committed to upholding human rights.In conclusion, the practice of extort confessions by torture is a grave violation of human rights that has far-reaching consequences. It not only compromises the integrity of the justice system but also inflicts lasting psychological harm on both victims and perpetrators. Furthermore, it fosters a culture of violence and distrust within society and damages a nation's reputation on the global stage. As we continue to advocate for human rights and justice, it is imperative that we reject the use of torture in any form and work towards a more humane and just world.

纵观历史， torture 作为获取信息手段的使用一直是一个深具争议和道德上令人厌恶的做法。最严重的例子之一就是当局试图通过逼迫供述以施加酷刑，这种方法不仅侵犯人权，而且破坏了正义的基本基础。在这篇文章中，我将探讨使用这种残酷手段的影响、对受害者和施虐者的心理影响，以及由此产生的更广泛的社会后果。逼迫供述以施加酷刑这一行为不仅违反伦理标准；它还是对人类尊严的根本攻击。酷刑常常导致虚假的供述，因为在极端的身体和心理压力下，个体可能会说任何事情以使痛苦停止。这引发了关于通过此类手段获得的信息可靠性的严重质疑。当供述是被强迫的，司法过程就会受到污染，导致错误定罪和正义的失误。法律体系的完整性依赖于自愿和真实的供述，而酷刑根本上摧毁了这一点。此外，酷刑的心理影响超出了直接受害者的范畴。施加痛苦的人也可能遭受长期的心理影响，包括内疚、羞愧和对暴力的麻木化。此类做法的正常化可能会创造出一种暴力文化，使同情心和怜悯心逐渐消失。这种暴力循环可能导致一个社会越来越接受不人道的待遇作为实现目标的合法手段，从而进一步延续虐待和痛苦的循环。除了个人后果外，使用酷刑作为审讯工具的社会影响也是深远的。目睹或意识到酷刑使用的社区可能会对其政府和法律机构产生深刻的不信任。这种信任的侵蚀可能导致社会动荡，因为人们感到自己的权利和自由正被系统性地侵犯。权威的合法性受到质疑，公民可能会诉诸抗议，甚至对他们认为压迫性的体制采取暴力抵抗。在国际上，酷刑的使用受到谴责，并且往往导致对参与此类行为的国家实施制裁和孤立。国际社会认识到人权是普遍的，酷刑的使用破坏了国际法和规范。允许逼迫供述以施加酷刑的国家面临损害其国际地位的风险，可能会遭受外交后果，并失去来自其他致力于维护人权的国家的援助和支持。总之，逼迫供述以施加酷刑的做法是对人权的严重侵犯，其影响深远。它不仅妨碍了司法体系的完整性，还对受害者和施虐者造成持久的心理伤害。此外，它在社会中滋生暴力和不信任的文化，并损害一个国家在全球舞台上的声誉。随着我们继续倡导人权和正义，拒绝以任何形式使用酷刑并努力实现一个更加人道和公正的世界显得至关重要。