zero-sum game; zero game

简明释义

零和博奕

英英释义

例句

1.In politics, some argue that certain policies create a zero-sum game (零和游戏) that benefits one group while harming another.

在政治中，有人认为某些政策造成了一个零和游戏 (零和游戏)，使得一个群体受益而另一个群体受损。

2.The competition between the two companies is often described as a zero-sum game (零和游戏), where one company’s market share increase comes at the expense of the other.

两家公司之间的竞争常常被描述为零和游戏 (零和游戏)，一家公司的市场份额增加是以另一家公司的损失为代价的。

3.Sports can sometimes feel like a zero-sum game (零和游戏), where only one team can win the championship.

体育比赛有时会让人感觉像是一个零和游戏 (零和游戏)，只有一支球队可以赢得冠军。

4.In environmental policy, debates about resource allocation often lead to a zero-sum game (零和游戏) mentality.

在环境政策中，关于资源分配的辩论往往导致一种零和游戏 (零和游戏) 的心态。

5.In a traditional negotiation, many people see it as a zero-sum game (零和游戏) where one party's gain is another's loss.

在传统的谈判中，许多人认为这是一场零和游戏 (零和游戏)，一方的收益就是另一方的损失。

作文

In the realm of economics and game theory, the concept of a zero-sum game (零和游戏) plays a crucial role in understanding competitive situations. A zero-sum game is defined as a situation in which one participant's gain or loss is exactly balanced by the losses or gains of other participants. This means that the total amount of wealth, resources, or utility remains constant; when one player wins, the other must lose an equivalent amount. This concept can be seen in various scenarios, from poker games to international trade negotiations, where the interests of opposing parties are directly in conflict.One of the most straightforward examples of a zero-sum game is a simple game of chess. In chess, there are two players, and the outcome of the game is purely competitive. If one player wins, the other player loses. There are no additional benefits or resources created in the process; instead, the victory of one player comes at the direct expense of the other. This stark contrast highlights the essence of a zero-sum game: the idea that in certain situations, the total gains and losses among the participants equal zero.However, not all competitive scenarios fit neatly into the zero-sum game framework. Many real-world situations involve elements of cooperation and mutual benefit, leading to outcomes where all parties can gain or lose simultaneously. For example, in business partnerships, companies may collaborate to create new products or services that benefit both parties, resulting in a positive-sum game rather than a zero-sum game. In these cases, the total value created exceeds the initial investments made by each party, demonstrating that collaboration can lead to win-win situations.The implications of understanding zero-sum games extend beyond mere academic interest; they have practical applications in negotiation tactics and strategic decision-making. When individuals or organizations recognize that they are engaged in a zero-sum game, they may adopt more aggressive strategies to secure their interests. This can lead to heightened competition and potentially adversarial relationships, as each side seeks to maximize their own advantage at the expense of others.On the other hand, recognizing opportunities for cooperation in situations that may initially appear to be zero-sum games can lead to innovative solutions and better outcomes for all involved. For instance, in environmental negotiations, countries may find ways to work together to achieve sustainability goals that benefit both the planet and their economies, transforming a potentially adversarial scenario into a collaborative effort.In conclusion, the concept of a zero-sum game (零和游戏) serves as a valuable lens through which we can analyze competitive interactions. While it provides important insights into situations where resources are limited and competition is fierce, it is equally important to recognize the potential for cooperation and collaboration in many contexts. By moving beyond the confines of a zero-sum game, we can foster environments where all parties can thrive, ultimately leading to more sustainable and beneficial outcomes for everyone involved.

在经济学和博弈论的领域中，零和游戏的概念在理解竞争性情境方面发挥着至关重要的作用。零和游戏被定义为一种情境，其中一个参与者的得失恰好与其他参与者的损失或收益相平衡。这意味着财富、资源或效用的总量保持不变；当一个玩家获胜时，另一个玩家必须失去相同数量。这一概念可以在各种场景中看到，从扑克游戏到国际贸易谈判，其中对立方的利益直接冲突。最简单的零和游戏的例子之一是简单的国际象棋比赛。在国际象棋中，有两个玩家，比赛的结果纯粹是竞争性的。如果一个玩家获胜，另一个玩家就会失去。这一过程没有创造额外的利益或资源；相反，一个玩家的胜利是以另一个玩家的直接损失为代价。这种鲜明的对比突显了零和游戏的本质：在某些情况下，参与者之间的总得失等于零。然而，并非所有竞争性场景都严格符合零和游戏的框架。许多现实世界的情况涉及合作和共同利益的元素，导致各方可以同时获益或失利。例如，在商业合作伙伴关系中，公司可能会合作创造新产品或服务，使双方受益，从而导致正和游戏，而不是零和游戏。在这些情况下，创造的总价值超过了每一方的初始投资，表明合作可以导致双赢的局面。理解零和游戏的意义超越了单纯的学术兴趣；它在谈判策略和战略决策中具有实际应用。当个人或组织意识到他们参与的是零和游戏时，他们可能会采取更具攻击性的策略来确保自己的利益。这可能导致竞争加剧，甚至潜在的对抗关系，因为每一方都试图在他人之上最大化自己的优势。另一方面，认识到在看似是零和游戏的情境中合作的机会，可以导致创新解决方案和更好的结果。例如，在环境谈判中，各国可能会找到共同努力实现可持续发展目标的方法，这对地球和经济都有利，从而将一个潜在的对抗场景转变为合作努力。总之，零和游戏的概念（零和游戏）作为分析竞争互动的一种有价值的视角。虽然它为我们提供了洞察资源有限和竞争激烈的情境的重要见解，但同样重要的是要认识到在许多背景下合作和协作的潜力。通过超越零和游戏的限制，我们可以促进各方都能蓬勃发展的环境，最终为所有参与者带来更可持续和有利的结果。