indirect election

简明释义

间接选举

英英释义

例句

1.In a parliamentary system, the prime minister is often elected through indirect elections by the legislature.

在议会制中，首相通常通过立法机构的间接选举选出。

2.The indirect election of senators was established to ensure that state legislatures had a say in federal governance.

参议员的间接选举是为了确保州立法机构在联邦治理中有发言权。

3.In many countries, the president is chosen through an indirect election, where representatives vote on behalf of the citizens.

在许多国家，总统是通过间接选举选出的，代表们代表公民投票。

4.Some argue that indirect elections can lead to a lack of accountability among elected officials.

一些人认为，间接选举可能导致当选官员缺乏问责制。

5.The council members were selected through an indirect election process involving local representatives.

理事会成员通过涉及地方代表的间接选举过程选出。

作文

In modern democracies, the concept of elections plays a crucial role in determining the representatives who will govern the people. Among various electoral systems, one that often sparks debate is the indirect election. An indirect election is a voting process in which citizens do not directly vote for their leaders; instead, they elect representatives who then make the final decision on behalf of the electorate. This system can be seen in various forms around the world, and it has both advantages and disadvantages that are worth exploring.One of the primary benefits of an indirect election is that it can lead to more informed decision-making. When citizens elect representatives, they are often choosing individuals who have a deeper understanding of political issues and governance. These representatives can take the time to study the complexities of policies and make choices that align with the best interests of their constituents. For instance, in the United States, the Electoral College is an example of an indirect election system where electors are chosen by voters to formally elect the President. This allows for a more structured approach to selecting a leader, as electors are expected to be knowledgeable about the candidates and the implications of their choices.Moreover, an indirect election can enhance stability within a government. By having elected officials make decisions rather than the general populace, the process can be streamlined, reducing the chances of rash decisions driven by popular opinion. In times of crisis, this stability can be crucial, as elected representatives may prioritize long-term solutions over immediate public sentiment. For example, during economic downturns, representatives may need to implement unpopular but necessary measures to stabilize the economy, something that might be difficult to achieve through direct public voting.However, there are also significant drawbacks to the indirect election system. One major concern is the potential for disconnect between representatives and their constituents. When voters do not directly choose their leaders, there is a risk that elected officials may prioritize their own interests or the interests of a select few rather than those of the broader public. This can lead to feelings of disenfranchisement among voters, who may feel that their voices are not adequately represented in the political arena.Furthermore, the indirect election process can sometimes lead to a lack of accountability. When representatives are not directly elected by the populace for specific positions, it may be challenging for voters to hold them responsible for their actions. This can result in a political landscape where elected officials feel less pressure to respond to the needs and concerns of their constituents, potentially leading to corruption or ineffective governance.In conclusion, the concept of indirect election presents a complex interplay of benefits and challenges. While it can facilitate informed decision-making and governmental stability, it also risks creating a disconnect between elected officials and the electorate. As societies continue to evolve, the debate over the effectiveness of indirect election versus direct voting methods will likely persist. Ultimately, the choice of electoral system should reflect the values and priorities of the society it serves, ensuring that the voices of the people are heard and represented in the political process.

在现代民主国家，选举的概念在决定谁将治理人民方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在各种选举制度中，一个常常引发争论的是间接选举。间接选举是一种投票过程，公民并不直接投票选举他们的领导者；相反，他们选举代表，后者代表选民做出最终决定。这种制度在世界各地以各种形式存在，并且它具有值得探讨的优缺点。间接选举的主要好处之一是它可以导致更为明智的决策。当公民选举代表时，他们通常是在选择对政治问题和治理有更深入理解的个人。这些代表可以花时间研究政策的复杂性，并做出符合其选民最佳利益的选择。例如，在美国，选举人团就是一种间接选举制度，选民通过选举人来正式选举总统。这允许以更有结构化的方式选择领导者，因为选举人预计会对候选人及其选择的影响有充分的了解。此外，间接选举可以增强政府的稳定性。通过让当选官员做出决定，而不是普通大众，这一过程可以得到简化，从而减少因公众舆论而产生的仓促决定的可能性。在危机时期，这种稳定性至关重要，因为当选代表可能需要优先考虑长期解决方案，而非即时的公众情绪。例如，在经济衰退期间，代表们可能需要实施不受欢迎但必要的措施以稳定经济，而这通过直接公投可能难以实现。然而，间接选举制度也存在显著的缺点。一个主要的担忧是代表与其选民之间可能存在的脱节。当选民不直接选择他们的领导者时，选举官员可能会优先考虑自己的利益或少数人的利益，而不是更广泛公众的利益。这可能导致选民感到被剥夺权利，他们可能觉得自己的声音在政治舞台上没有得到充分代表。此外，间接选举过程有时可能导致缺乏问责制。当代表并不是由公众直接选举出来担任特定职位时，选民可能很难对他们的行为进行追责。这可能导致政治环境中，当选官员感受到的压力较小，更少响应选民的需求和关注，从而可能导致腐败或低效的治理。总之，间接选举的概念呈现出优缺点的复杂交织。虽然它可以促进明智的决策和政府的稳定，但也有可能导致当选官员与选民之间的脱节。随着社会的不断发展，关于间接选举与直接投票方法的有效性的辩论可能会持续下去。最终，选举制度的选择应反映社会的价值观和优先事项，确保人民的声音在政治过程中得到倾听和代表。