neutralism

简明释义

英[ˈnjuːtrəlɪzəm]美[ˈnuːtrəlɪzəm]

n. 中立；中立主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It's not appropriate to regard neutralism as eclecticism and then criticize or thoroughly abandon it.

把“中立”当作折中主义而加以批判和彻底抛弃是不妥当的。

2.The neutralism of scientific value is the important issue .

科学价值中立说是科学研究的重要课题。

3.It's not appropriate to regard neutralism as eclecticism and then criticize or thoroughly abandon it.

把“中立”当作折中主义而加以批判和彻底抛弃是不妥当的。

4.Many believe that neutralism is essential for countries facing internal divisions.

许多人认为，面对内部分裂的国家，中立主义是至关重要的。

5.The policy of neutralism in foreign affairs allows a country to avoid entanglement in conflicts.

在外交事务中，中立主义的政策使一个国家能够避免卷入冲突。

6.The concept of neutralism can be seen in Switzerland's long-standing policy of not joining military alliances.

瑞士长期不加入军事联盟的政策体现了中立主义的概念。

7.During the Cold War, some nations adopted neutralism to maintain peace and stability.

在冷战期间，一些国家采取了中立主义以维持和平与稳定。

8.In international relations, neutralism can sometimes lead to criticism for inaction.

在国际关系中，中立主义有时会因不作为而受到批评。

作文

In the complex tapestry of international relations, the concept of neutralism plays a pivotal role. 中立主义 is defined as the policy or doctrine of maintaining neutrality in conflicts, particularly in wars between other states. This approach can be seen as a strategic choice for countries that wish to avoid entanglement in external conflicts while focusing on their internal affairs. Throughout history, various nations have adopted neutralism to safeguard their sovereignty and promote peace. One of the most notable examples of neutralism can be found in Switzerland, which has maintained a stance of neutrality since the early 19th century. The Swiss government has consistently refrained from participating in military alliances and conflicts, allowing it to become a hub for diplomacy and international negotiations. This long-standing policy has not only protected Switzerland from the ravages of war but has also fostered an environment where dialogue and cooperation thrive. Another instance of neutralism is seen in the context of the Cold War. Several countries, particularly in the Non-Aligned Movement, chose to remain neutral rather than align with either the Western bloc led by the United States or the Eastern bloc led by the Soviet Union. Nations such as India and Yugoslavia played significant roles in promoting neutralism during this period, advocating for peaceful coexistence and mutual respect among nations. Their commitment to neutrality allowed them to maintain autonomy in their foreign policies and engage with both sides without being drawn into their conflicts. However, the practice of neutralism is not without its challenges. In a world increasingly characterized by global interdependence, remaining neutral can sometimes be perceived as indifference or lack of commitment to global issues. Critics argue that countries practicing neutralism may miss opportunities to influence important matters such as human rights, environmental protection, and international security. For instance, during humanitarian crises, a neutral stance might lead to accusations of failing to uphold moral responsibilities. Moreover, the rise of global terrorism and transnational threats complicates the notion of neutralism. Countries that prioritize neutrality may find it difficult to respond effectively to these challenges, as they often require collective action and cooperation among nations. This raises the question of whether true neutrality is achievable or even desirable in today’s interconnected world. Despite these challenges, neutralism remains a relevant and vital strategy for many nations. It allows countries to focus on their development, stability, and prosperity without the distractions of external conflicts. Furthermore, by promoting dialogue and understanding, neutral countries can serve as mediators in disputes, fostering peace and cooperation. In conclusion, the concept of neutralism represents a nuanced approach to international relations that prioritizes peace and stability over conflict. While it faces criticism and challenges in the modern world, the principles of neutralism continue to resonate with nations seeking to navigate the complexities of global politics. As we look to the future, the importance of neutrality in fostering dialogue and understanding among nations cannot be overstated. Countries that embrace neutralism may find themselves in a unique position to contribute positively to global peace and security, proving that sometimes, standing apart can be just as powerful as standing together.

在国际关系的复杂织锦中，中立主义这一概念发挥着关键作用。中立主义被定义为在冲突中，特别是在其他国家之间的战争中保持中立的政策或理论。这种方法可以看作是那些希望避免卷入外部冲突，同时专注于内部事务的国家的一种战略选择。在历史上，各国采用中立主义来保护其主权并促进和平。一个最显著的中立主义例子可以在瑞士找到，自19世纪初以来，该国一直保持中立立场。瑞士政府始终避免参与军事同盟和冲突，使其成为外交和国际谈判的中心。这一长期政策不仅保护了瑞士免受战争的破坏，而且还促进了对话与合作的环境。另一个中立主义的实例是在冷战背景下。许多国家，特别是在不结盟运动中，选择保持中立，而不是与以美国为首的西方集团或以苏联为首的东方集团结盟。印度和南斯拉夫等国家在这一时期积极推动中立主义，倡导国家之间的和平共处和相互尊重。他们对中立的承诺使他们能够在不卷入冲突的情况下，与双方保持联系。然而，中立主义的实践并非没有挑战。在一个日益全球相互依赖的世界中，保持中立有时可能被视为冷漠或缺乏对全球问题的承诺。批评者认为，实行中立主义的国家可能会错失影响人权、环境保护和国际安全等重要事务的机会。例如，在人道主义危机期间，中立立场可能导致未能履行道德责任的指责。此外，全球恐怖主义和跨国威胁的增加使得中立主义的概念变得复杂。优先考虑中立的国家可能会发现很难有效应对这些挑战，因为它们通常需要各国之间的集体行动和合作。这就提出了一个问题，即在当今互联的世界中，真正的中立是否可实现或甚至可取。尽管面临这些挑战，中立主义仍然是许多国家相关且重要的战略。它使各国能够专注于自身的发展、稳定和繁荣，而不必分心于外部冲突。此外，通过促进对话和理解，中立国家可以在争端中充当调解者，促进和平与合作。总之，中立主义的概念代表了一种微妙的国际关系方法，优先考虑和平与稳定而非冲突。尽管在现代世界中面临批评和挑战，但中立主义的原则仍然与寻求驾驭全球政治复杂性的国家产生共鸣。展望未来，中立在促进国家之间对话和理解方面的重要性不容低估。拥抱中立主义的国家可能会发现自己处于独特的位置，可以积极贡献于全球和平与安全，证明有时，站在一旁也可以与站在一起一样强大。