right of adjudication

简明释义

终审权

英英释义

例句

1.The contract clearly states that each party has the right of adjudication 裁决权 in case of a dispute.

合同明确规定，在发生争议的情况下，各方都有裁决权。

2.The employee handbook outlines the right of adjudication 裁决权 for grievances.

员工手册概述了对投诉的裁决权。

3.During the mediation, both sides agreed to exercise their right of adjudication 裁决权 if no resolution was reached.

在调解过程中，双方同意如果未能达成解决方案，将行使各自的裁决权。

4.In some jurisdictions, the right of adjudication 裁决权 allows parties to resolve their issues without going to court.

在某些法域中，裁决权允许各方在不去法院的情况下解决问题。

5.The right of adjudication 裁决权 is an important aspect of many arbitration agreements.

在许多仲裁协议中，裁决权是一个重要方面。

作文

The concept of the right of adjudication is fundamental in the legal system, as it refers to the authority granted to a party to resolve disputes through a formal process. This right is pivotal in ensuring that conflicts are settled fairly and justly, providing a mechanism for individuals and entities to seek redress when they believe their rights have been infringed upon. In many jurisdictions, the right of adjudication is enshrined in law, allowing parties to bring their cases before a judge or an arbitrator who will make binding decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented.In civil law systems, the right of adjudication allows individuals to submit their grievances to the court, where a judge evaluates the case's merits. The judge's decision can lead to remedies such as damages, injunctions, or specific performance, depending on the nature of the dispute. This process not only provides a resolution but also serves to uphold the rule of law, ensuring that everyone has access to justice.In contrast, common law systems often emphasize the adversarial nature of the right of adjudication, where two parties present their cases before a neutral judge. Here, the focus is on the ability of each party to advocate for their position, with the judge acting as an impartial arbiter who ensures that the trial proceeds according to established legal principles. The outcome of this adjudication process is critical, as it can set legal precedents that influence future cases.Moreover, the right of adjudication extends beyond traditional court settings. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as arbitration and mediation, also embody this right. These methods provide parties with more flexible options to resolve their conflicts outside of the courtroom. For instance, in arbitration, the parties agree to submit their dispute to a neutral third party, whose decision is usually final and binding. This process can be less formal and more expedient than traditional court proceedings, making it an attractive option for many.The importance of the right of adjudication cannot be overstated. It acts as a safeguard against injustice, allowing individuals to challenge wrongful actions and seek compensation or other forms of remedy. Without this right, individuals would be left without recourse in the face of violations of their rights, leading to a breakdown of trust in legal systems. Furthermore, the right of adjudication promotes accountability among individuals and organizations, as the fear of legal repercussions can deter harmful behavior.In conclusion, the right of adjudication is a cornerstone of any fair and just legal system. It empowers individuals to assert their rights and seek resolutions to disputes that may arise in various aspects of life. Understanding this right is essential for anyone navigating legal matters, as it highlights the importance of due process and the rule of law. By ensuring that everyone has access to this right, societies can foster a culture of respect for individual rights and promote harmony among their members.

“裁决权”这一概念在法律体系中至关重要，它指的是赋予一方通过正式程序解决争议的权力。这项权利对于确保冲突得到公平和公正的解决至关重要，为个人和实体提供了一种机制，当他们认为自己的权利受到侵犯时，可以寻求救济。在许多法域中，“裁决权”被法律所确立，允许当事人将其案件提交给法官或仲裁员，由其根据所呈现的证据和论据作出具有约束力的决定。在民法体系中，“裁决权”允许个人将其不满提交给法院，法官评估案件的优劣。法官的裁决可以导致赔偿、禁令或特定履行等救济措施，具体取决于争议的性质。这个过程不仅提供了解决方案，而且有助于维护法治，确保每个人都能获得正义。相对而言，普通法体系通常强调“裁决权”的对抗性特征，两个当事方在中立法官面前陈述各自的案件。在这里，重点是每一方能够为其立场辩护，法官作为公正的仲裁者，确保审判按照既定法律原则进行。裁决过程的结果至关重要，因为它可以设定影响未来案件的法律先例。此外，“裁决权”还超越了传统的法庭环境。替代性争议解决（ADR）机制，如仲裁和调解，也体现了这一权利。这些方法为当事人提供了更灵活的选择，以便在法庭外解决冲突。例如，在仲裁中，当事人同意将争议提交给中立的第三方，其决定通常是最终的和具有约束力的。这个过程可能比传统的法庭程序更不正式且更迅速，使其成为许多人吸引的选择。“裁决权”的重要性不容小觑。它充当了对不公正行为的保护措施，使个人能够挑战错误行为并寻求赔偿或其他形式的救济。如果没有这一权利，个人在面对权利侵犯时将无路可退，这将导致法律体系信任的崩溃。此外，“裁决权”促进了个人和组织的问责制，因为法律后果的恐惧可以阻止有害行为。总之，“裁决权”是任何公平和公正的法律体系的基石。它赋予个人主张其权利的能力，并寻求解决可能在生活各个方面出现的争议。理解这一权利对于任何处理法律事务的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它突显了正当程序和法治的重要性。通过确保每个人都能获得这一权利，社会可以培养对个人权利的尊重文化，促进成员之间的和谐。