report only the good but not the bad

简明释义

报喜不报忧

英英释义

例句

1.Some news outlets report only the good but not the bad when covering celebrity stories, creating a skewed public perception.

一些新闻媒体在报道名人故事时只报告好的而不报告坏的，造成公众认知的偏差。

2.During the project update, the leader chose to report only the good but not the bad to maintain team morale.

在项目更新中，领导选择只报告好的而不报告坏的以维持团队士气。

3.In his blog, he tends to report only the good but not the bad about his travel experiences, making it seem like every trip is perfect.

在他的博客中，他往往只报告好的而不报告坏的旅行经历，让每次旅行看起来都完美无缺。

4.The marketing team decided to report only the good but not the bad results in their presentation to impress the stakeholders.

市场团队决定在向利益相关者的演示中只报告好的而不报告坏的结果，以给人留下深刻印象。

5.In a performance review, the manager tends to report only the good but not the bad about his team members, which can lead to a lack of constructive feedback.

在绩效评估中，经理往往只报告好的而不报告坏的，这可能导致缺乏建设性的反馈。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception. However, there is a growing concern that many outlets tend to report only the good but not the bad. This practice can lead to a skewed understanding of reality, as it often omits critical information that the public needs to make informed decisions. The phrase report only the good but not the bad refers to the tendency of certain media sources to highlight positive events or outcomes while ignoring negative ones, creating an unrealistic portrayal of situations.One of the primary reasons for this trend is the competitive nature of news reporting. In an era where sensationalism often drives viewership and engagement, media outlets may feel pressured to present stories in a way that attracts more viewers. By focusing solely on positive aspects, they can create a more appealing narrative. For instance, a news report about a local community might emphasize successful fundraising events and community projects, while neglecting issues such as crime rates or economic challenges. This selective reporting can lead to a false sense of security among residents, who may believe their community is thriving without recognizing underlying problems.Moreover, report only the good but not the bad can also manifest in corporate communications. Companies often showcase their achievements and positive impacts on society, while downplaying or completely ignoring failures or negative consequences. This can be particularly problematic in industries that have significant social and environmental impacts. For example, a corporation might highlight its efforts in sustainability and community development while failing to address pollution incidents or labor disputes. Such practices can mislead stakeholders and consumers, who may not be aware of the full picture.The implications of report only the good but not the bad extend beyond media and corporate environments; they can also influence individual behavior. When people are constantly exposed to idealized portrayals of life, they may develop unrealistic expectations for themselves and others. Social media platforms are notorious for this phenomenon, as users often share only the highlights of their lives—vacations, promotions, and celebrations—while omitting struggles and setbacks. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy and anxiety among those who compare their everyday lives to these curated images.To counter the effects of report only the good but not the bad, it is essential for both media and individuals to strive for a more balanced representation of reality. Journalists should aim to provide comprehensive coverage that includes both positive developments and critical issues. This approach not only fosters transparency but also encourages accountability among those in power. Likewise, individuals should cultivate a culture of authenticity by sharing both successes and challenges, thereby promoting a more realistic and supportive community.In conclusion, while it may be tempting to report only the good but not the bad, doing so ultimately distorts our understanding of the world. Acknowledging both the positive and negative aspects of any situation allows for a more nuanced perspective, fostering informed decision-making and genuine connections. It is vital for all of us—media professionals, corporations, and individuals—to embrace a more holistic approach to reporting and sharing experiences, ensuring that we paint a complete picture of reality.

在当今快节奏的世界中，媒体在塑造公众认知方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而，越来越多的人担心，许多媒体往往倾向于只报道好的一面而不报道坏的一面。这种做法可能导致对现实的扭曲理解，因为它通常省略了公众需要做出明智决策的重要信息。短语只报道好的一面而不报道坏的一面指的是某些媒体来源突出积极事件或结果，同时忽略消极因素，从而创造出不切实际的情境描绘。这种趋势的主要原因之一是新闻报道的竞争性质。在一个耸人听闻常常驱动观众和参与度的时代，媒体机构可能感到有压力以吸引更多观众的方式呈现故事。通过仅关注积极方面，他们可以创造出更具吸引力的叙述。例如，一则关于当地社区的新闻报道可能强调成功的筹款活动和社区项目，而忽略诸如犯罪率或经济挑战等问题。这种选择性报道可能导致居民产生一种虚假的安全感，他们可能认为自己的社区正在蓬勃发展，而没有意识到潜在的问题。此外，只报道好的一面而不报道坏的一面也可能在企业传播中表现出来。公司通常展示他们的成就和对社会的积极影响，同时淡化或完全忽视失败或负面后果。这在对社会和环境有重大影响的行业中尤其成问题。例如，一家公司可能会强调其在可持续发展和社区发展的努力，而未能解决污染事件或劳动争议等问题。这种做法可能误导利益相关者和消费者，使他们无法了解完整的情况。只报道好的一面而不报道坏的一面的影响超出了媒体和企业环境；它们还可以影响个人行为。当人们不断接触到理想化的生活描绘时，他们可能会对自己和他人产生不切实际的期望。社交媒体平台就是这一现象的典型，因为用户通常只分享生活中的亮点——假期、晋升和庆祝活动——而省略了挣扎和挫折。这可能导致与这些策划图像进行比较的人产生不充分和焦虑的感觉。为了抵消只报道好的一面而不报道坏的一面的影响，媒体和个人都必须努力追求更平衡的现实表现。记者应努力提供全面的报道，包括积极的发展和关键问题。这种方法不仅促进透明度，还鼓励掌权者的问责制。同样，个人应培养一种真实性文化，通过分享成功与挑战，促进更真实和支持的社区。总之，尽管倾向于只报道好的一面而不报道坏的一面可能是一个诱人的选择，但这样做最终会扭曲我们对世界的理解。承认任何情况下的积极和消极方面使我们能够获得更细致的视角，促进明智的决策和真实的联系。对于我们所有人——媒体专业人士、企业和个人——来说，接受一种更全面的报告和分享体验的方法至关重要，以确保我们描绘出现实的完整图景。