predatory price cutting

简明释义

掠夺性竟争削价

英英释义

例句

1.The company was accused of predatory price cutting to eliminate its competition.

该公司被指控采用掠夺性降价来消灭竞争对手。

2.To combat predatory price cutting, many businesses focus on customer service and brand loyalty.

为了应对掠夺性降价，许多企业专注于客户服务和品牌忠诚度。

3.Many small retailers struggle to survive against the predatory price cutting of large corporations.

许多小零售商在大型企业的掠夺性降价下苦苦挣扎。

4.Regulators are concerned that predatory price cutting can lead to monopolistic practices.

监管机构担心掠夺性降价可能导致垄断行为。

5.The startup filed a lawsuit claiming that the industry leader engaged in predatory price cutting.

这家初创公司提起诉讼，声称行业领导者进行了掠夺性降价。

作文

In today's competitive market, businesses are constantly looking for ways to attract customers and increase their market share. One strategy that some companies employ is known as predatory price cutting, which refers to the practice of setting prices extremely low in order to eliminate competition. This tactic can be particularly effective in industries where there are a limited number of competitors or where new entrants are trying to break into the market. However, while predatory price cutting may provide short-term benefits for the company implementing it, it can also have significant long-term consequences for both the business and the industry as a whole.The primary goal of predatory price cutting is to drive competitors out of the market. By lowering prices to unsustainable levels, a company can make it difficult for its rivals to compete effectively. This can lead to a situation where smaller or less financially stable companies are forced to either drastically reduce their prices or exit the market altogether. Once the competition has been eliminated, the company that engaged in predatory price cutting can then raise its prices back to a more profitable level, often resulting in higher profits than before.However, this practice raises ethical concerns. Many argue that predatory price cutting is an unfair tactic that undermines the principles of free market competition. It can create a monopoly or oligopoly situation, where only a few companies dominate the market, leading to reduced choices for consumers and potentially higher prices in the long run. Moreover, it can stifle innovation, as smaller companies may be discouraged from investing in new products or services if they fear being driven out of business by larger competitors employing aggressive pricing strategies.Regulatory bodies in many countries have recognized the potential dangers of predatory price cutting and have implemented laws to prevent such practices. For example, antitrust laws are designed to promote fair competition and prevent monopolistic behaviors. Companies found to be engaging in predatory price cutting can face significant penalties, including fines and restrictions on their business practices. However, proving that a company is engaging in predatory price cutting can be challenging, as it often requires demonstrating intent and the ability to sustain losses over time.In conclusion, while predatory price cutting may seem like an attractive strategy for gaining market share, it is fraught with risks and ethical dilemmas. Companies must weigh the potential short-term gains against the long-term implications for their reputation and the overall health of the industry. As consumers become more aware of these tactics, they may choose to support businesses that prioritize fair competition and ethical practices over those that resort to aggressive pricing strategies. Ultimately, sustaining a healthy marketplace requires a balance between competitive pricing and ethical business practices, ensuring that all players have a fair chance to succeed without resorting to tactics like predatory price cutting.

在当今竞争激烈的市场中，企业不断寻找吸引顾客和增加市场份额的方法。一些公司采用的策略被称为掠夺性降价，指的是将价格定得极低以消灭竞争对手的做法。这种策略在竞争者数量有限或新进入者试图打入市场的行业中特别有效。然而，尽管掠夺性降价可能为实施它的公司带来短期利益，但它也可能对企业和整个行业产生重大长期影响。掠夺性降价的主要目标是将竞争对手驱逐出市场。通过将价格降低到不可持续的水平，一家公司可以使其竞争对手难以有效竞争。这可能导致较小或财务状况不佳的公司被迫要么大幅降低价格，要么彻底退出市场。一旦竞争对手被消灭，进行掠夺性降价的公司就可以将价格提高到更有利可图的水平，通常会导致比之前更高的利润。然而，这种做法引发了伦理问题。许多人认为掠夺性降价是一种不公平的策略，破坏了自由市场竞争的原则。它可能导致垄断或寡头市场的形成，只有少数几家公司主导市场，从而减少消费者的选择，并可能在长期内导致更高的价格。此外，它还可能抑制创新，因为较小的公司可能因担心被采用激进定价策略的大型竞争对手驱逐出局而不愿投资于新产品或服务。许多国家的监管机构认识到掠夺性降价的潜在危险，并实施了法律以防止此类行为。例如，反垄断法旨在促进公平竞争并防止垄断行为。被发现从事掠夺性降价的公司可能面临重大处罚，包括罚款和限制其商业行为。然而，证明一家公司正在进行掠夺性降价可能很具挑战性，因为这通常需要证明意图和在一段时间内维持亏损的能力。总之，虽然掠夺性降价看似是一种获得市场份额的有吸引力的策略，但它充满了风险和伦理困境。企业必须权衡潜在的短期收益与对其声誉和行业整体健康的长期影响。随着消费者对这些策略的认识增加，他们可能会选择支持那些优先考虑公平竞争和伦理实践的企业，而不是那些诉诸于激进定价策略的企业。最终，维持一个健康的市场需要在竞争定价和伦理商业实践之间取得平衡，确保所有参与者都有公平的机会成功，而不必诉诸于如掠夺性降价这样的策略。