national monopoly

简明释义

国家垄断

英英释义

例句

1.The establishment of a national monopoly 国家垄断 in the banking sector aims to stabilize the economy.

在银行业建立国家垄断 national monopoly旨在稳定经济。

2.Critics argue that a national monopoly 国家垄断 can stifle innovation and competition in the market.

批评者认为，国家垄断 national monopoly可能会抑制市场中的创新和竞争。

3.The government has established a national monopoly 国家垄断 on the production of certain essential goods to ensure quality and availability.

政府已对某些基本商品的生产建立了国家垄断 national monopoly，以确保质量和可用性。

4.The national monopoly 国家垄断 on public utilities often results in limited choices for consumers.

公共事业的国家垄断 national monopoly通常导致消费者选择有限。

5.In some countries, a national monopoly 国家垄断 in telecommunications can lead to higher prices for consumers.

在一些国家，电信领域的国家垄断 national monopoly可能导致消费者支付更高的价格。

作文

The concept of a national monopoly refers to a situation where a single entity or organization holds exclusive control over a specific market or industry within a nation. This can occur in various sectors, including utilities, telecommunications, and transportation. While the idea of a national monopoly might initially seem beneficial due to the potential for streamlined services and reduced costs, it can also lead to significant drawbacks that affect consumers and the economy as a whole.One of the primary advantages of a national monopoly is the ability to provide consistent and reliable services. For instance, in the case of public utilities such as water and electricity, having a single provider can simplify infrastructure development and maintenance. The government can regulate prices and ensure that all citizens have access to essential services, which can be particularly important in rural or underserved areas. Additionally, a national monopoly can invest heavily in research and development, leading to innovations that might not be feasible for multiple competing companies.However, the disadvantages of a national monopoly often outweigh these benefits. Without competition, there is little incentive for the monopolistic entity to improve its services or lower prices. Consumers may find themselves facing higher costs and limited choices, as they are unable to switch providers if they are dissatisfied with the service. This lack of competition can lead to complacency and inefficiency, ultimately harming the quality of services offered.Moreover, a national monopoly can create barriers to entry for new businesses. When a single company dominates the market, it becomes exceedingly difficult for startups or smaller firms to compete. This can stifle innovation and economic growth, as new ideas and technologies struggle to gain traction in an environment where one player controls the entire market.In some cases, a national monopoly can also lead to corruption and abuse of power. With no competition to keep them in check, monopolistic entities may engage in unethical practices, such as price gouging or neglecting customer service. This can result in public outcry and loss of trust in the institution, further complicating the relationship between the government and its citizens.Governments must carefully consider the implications of allowing a national monopoly to exist. While there are situations where a monopoly may be justified, such as in the case of natural monopolies where the cost of entry is prohibitively high, regulatory frameworks need to be established to protect consumers. This may include measures such as price controls, quality standards, and oversight committees to ensure that the monopolistic entity operates fairly and efficiently.In conclusion, the term national monopoly encapsulates both the potential advantages and disadvantages of having a single entity control a market within a nation. While it can lead to efficiency and consistency in service delivery, it also poses risks of complacency, lack of innovation, and consumer exploitation. Policymakers must strike a delicate balance between the benefits of a national monopoly and the need for competition to foster a healthy economy and ensure the welfare of citizens.

“国家垄断”这一概念指的是在一个国家内，单一实体或组织对特定市场或行业拥有独占控制权的情况。这种情况可能发生在多个领域，包括公用事业、电信和交通运输等。虽然“国家垄断”这个概念最初看起来由于潜在的服务简化和成本降低而显得有利，但它也可能带来显著的缺点，影响消费者和整个经济。“国家垄断”的主要优点之一是能够提供一致和可靠的服务。例如，在公共事业如水和电的情况下，拥有一个单一的供应商可以简化基础设施的发展和维护。政府可以监管价格，确保所有公民都能获得必要的服务，这在农村或服务不足的地区尤其重要。此外，“国家垄断”还可以大量投资于研究和开发，推动创新，这在多个竞争公司中可能不可行。然而，“国家垄断”的缺点往往超过这些好处。没有竞争，垄断实体几乎没有动力改善服务或降低价格。消费者可能发现自己面临更高的成本和有限的选择，因为如果对服务不满意，他们无法更换供应商。这种缺乏竞争可能导致自满和低效率，最终损害所提供服务的质量。此外，“国家垄断”还可能为新企业设置进入壁垒。当一个公司主导市场时，新兴企业或小型公司变得极其难以竞争。这可能抑制创新和经济增长，因为新想法和技术在一个由单一参与者主导的环境中难以获得立足之地。在某些情况下，“国家垄断”还可能导致腐败和权力滥用。由于没有竞争来制衡，垄断实体可能会采取不道德的做法，例如价格欺诈或忽视客户服务。这可能导致公众的抗议和对机构的信任丧失，进一步复杂化政府与公民之间的关系。政府必须仔细考虑允许“国家垄断”存在的影响。虽然在某些情况下，垄断可能是合理的，例如在自然垄断的情况下，进入成本过高，但需要建立监管框架来保护消费者。这可能包括价格控制、质量标准和监督委员会等措施，以确保垄断实体公平高效地运作。总之，“国家垄断”这一术语概括了在一个国家内，单一实体控制市场的潜在优势和劣势。虽然它可以导致服务交付的效率和一致性，但也带来了自满、缺乏创新和消费者剥削的风险。政策制定者必须在“国家垄断”的好处和促进健康经济所需的竞争之间取得微妙的平衡。