monopoly enterprise

简明释义

垄断企业

英英释义

例句

1.The rise of digital platforms has led to the emergence of new monopoly enterprises 垄断企业 in the tech industry.

数字平台的崛起导致科技行业出现新的monopoly enterprises 垄断企业。

2.Consumers often suffer from high prices due to the lack of competition in a monopoly enterprise 垄断企业.

由于缺乏竞争，消费者往往因monopoly enterprise 垄断企业而遭受高价之苦。

3.Many argue that a monopoly enterprise 垄断企业 stifles innovation and limits consumer choices.

许多人认为，monopoly enterprise 垄断企业扼杀了创新，限制了消费者的选择。

4.The government imposed strict regulations on the monopoly enterprise 垄断企业 to prevent abuse of market power.

政府对monopoly enterprise 垄断企业实施了严格的监管，以防止市场权力的滥用。

5.The monopoly enterprise 垄断企业 was fined for violating antitrust laws.

monopoly enterprise 垄断企业因违反反垄断法被罚款。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving economy, the concept of a monopoly enterprise has become increasingly relevant. A monopoly enterprise refers to a company that holds exclusive control over a particular market or industry, allowing it to dictate prices and terms without competition. This phenomenon can have significant implications for consumers, competitors, and the overall health of the economy. One of the most prominent examples of a monopoly enterprise is Microsoft during the late 1990s and early 2000s. The company dominated the personal computer operating system market with its Windows software, effectively stifling competition from other developers. As a result, consumers had limited choices, and innovation in the sector slowed down. This situation prompted legal action from the U.S. government, which argued that Microsoft's practices were anti-competitive and harmful to consumers. The existence of a monopoly enterprise can lead to higher prices for consumers, as the lack of competition allows these companies to set prices arbitrarily. For instance, if a single company controls the supply of a critical good, it can increase prices without fear of losing customers to competitors. This scenario can create a burden on consumers, particularly those with lower incomes who may struggle to afford essential goods and services. Moreover, a monopoly enterprise can hinder innovation and technological advancement. When one company dominates a market, there is often little incentive to invest in research and development. Competitors are necessary to drive innovation, as they push each other to improve products and services. Without competition, a monopoly enterprise may become complacent, focusing instead on maintaining its market share rather than improving its offerings. This can lead to stagnation in the industry, ultimately harming consumers who benefit from new technologies and advancements. Governments around the world have implemented antitrust laws to prevent the formation of monopoly enterprises and to promote fair competition. These laws aim to break up large companies that threaten to dominate their respective markets. For example, in 2011, the European Union fined Google for engaging in anti-competitive practices related to its search engine. Such actions demonstrate the importance of maintaining a competitive landscape to ensure that consumers have access to diverse options and fair prices. In conclusion, while monopoly enterprises can offer certain efficiencies and benefits, their potential to harm consumers and stifle innovation cannot be ignored. It is crucial for governments and regulatory bodies to monitor market dynamics and take action when necessary to prevent the emergence of monopolies. By fostering a competitive environment, we can ensure that consumers enjoy a wider range of choices, better prices, and continued innovation in various industries. The balance between allowing businesses to grow and preventing monopolistic practices is essential for a healthy economy and society.

在当今快速发展的经济中，“垄断企业”的概念变得越来越相关。“垄断企业”是指在特定市场或行业中拥有独占控制权的公司，使其能够在没有竞争的情况下决定价格和条款。这种现象对消费者、竞争者以及整体经济健康都有重要影响。“垄断企业”最显著的例子之一是微软在1990年代末和2000年代初期。该公司凭借其Windows软件主导了个人计算机操作系统市场，有效地压制了其他开发者的竞争。因此，消费者的选择有限，行业内的创新也减缓了。这一情况促使美国政府采取法律行动，认为微软的做法具有反竞争性，对消费者造成了伤害。“垄断企业”的存在可能导致消费者价格上涨，因为缺乏竞争使这些公司可以随意设定价格。例如，如果一家公司的关键商品供应受到控制，它可以在不担心失去客户的情况下提高价格。这种情况可能给消费者带来负担，特别是那些低收入者，他们可能难以负担基本商品和服务。此外，“垄断企业”还可能阻碍创新和技术进步。当一家公司主导市场时，通常缺乏投资于研发的动力。竞争者是推动创新的必要条件，因为他们相互促进，提高产品和服务。没有竞争，“垄断企业”可能会变得自满，转而专注于维持市场份额，而不是改善其产品。这可能导致行业停滞，最终损害消费者，他们从新技术和进步中受益。世界各国政府实施了反垄断法，以防止“垄断企业”的形成，并促进公平竞争。这些法律旨在拆分那些威胁到其各自市场主导地位的大型公司。例如，在2011年，欧盟因谷歌参与反竞争行为而对其处以罚款。这些行动表明，维护竞争环境的重要性，以确保消费者能够获得多样的选择和公平的价格。总之，尽管“垄断企业”可以提供某些效率和利益，但它们对消费者造成伤害和抑制创新的潜力不容忽视。政府和监管机构必须密切关注市场动态，并在必要时采取行动以防止垄断的出现。通过促进竞争环境，我们可以确保消费者享有更广泛的选择、更好的价格以及各行业持续的创新。在允许企业增长与防止垄断行为之间保持平衡，对于健康的经济和社会至关重要。