exercise the veto

简明释义

行使否决权

英英释义

例句

1.Congress was surprised when the senator chose to exercise the veto 行使否决权 against the environmental regulations.

国会对参议员选择对环境法规行使否决权感到惊讶。

2.The mayor plans to exercise the veto 行使否决权 on the new tax proposal next week.

市长计划在下周对新的税收提案行使否决权。

3.The president decided to exercise the veto 行使否决权 on the controversial bill.

总统决定对这项有争议的法案行使否决权。

4.In response to public outcry, the council member decided to exercise the veto 行使否决权 on the zoning changes.

针对公众的抗议，委员会成员决定对区域变更行使否决权。

5.During the meeting, the governor threatened to exercise the veto 行使否决权 if the budget cuts were not revised.

在会议期间，州长威胁说如果预算削减不被修正，他将行使否决权。

作文

In the realm of politics, the term exercise the veto refers to the power of an individual or body to reject a decision or proposal made by a legislative assembly. This power is often vested in a leader or an executive authority, such as a president or a governor. The ability to exercise the veto serves as a critical check and balance within government systems, ensuring that not all decisions can be made unilaterally without oversight. For example, in the United States, the President has the authority to exercise the veto against bills passed by Congress, thereby preventing them from becoming law unless Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both houses.The concept of veto power is rooted in the desire to protect minority interests and prevent the tyranny of the majority. By allowing a single individual or a small group to exercise the veto, the system aims to foster deliberation and encourage lawmakers to consider a wider array of perspectives before enacting legislation. However, this power can also lead to political gridlock, where important measures are stalled due to disagreements between the executive and legislative branches.Historically, the exercise of the veto has been a contentious issue in many governments. For instance, during the early years of the American republic, President Thomas Jefferson famously used his veto power sparingly, believing that it should be reserved for only the most egregious cases. In contrast, more recent presidents have been known to exercise the veto more frequently, reflecting a shift towards a more assertive use of executive power.Moreover, the implications of exercising the veto extend beyond mere legislative rejection. It can also impact political relationships and public perception. When a president or governor chooses to exercise the veto, it sends a signal to their constituents and opponents alike about their priorities and willingness to stand firm against certain policies. This act can galvanize support from like-minded individuals while simultaneously alienating those who favor the rejected measure.In international relations, the term exercise the veto takes on additional significance, particularly within organizations like the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Here, the five permanent members—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—hold the power to exercise the veto over substantive resolutions. This unique structure means that any one of these nations can halt a resolution, regardless of the majority opinion among other member states. The exercise of the veto in this context often leads to debates about fairness, representation, and the effectiveness of global governance.In conclusion, the ability to exercise the veto is a powerful tool within political systems that can shape the course of legislation and governance. While it serves as a necessary safeguard against hasty decision-making, it also poses challenges in terms of political cooperation and effective governance. Understanding the nuances of this power is essential for anyone looking to engage with or analyze political processes, whether at a local, national, or international level. As societies evolve, the debate surrounding the exercise of the veto will likely continue, reflecting broader discussions about democracy, representation, and accountability.

在政治领域，术语行使否决权指的是个人或机构拒绝立法机构所做决策或提案的权力。这种权力通常由领导者或执行机构，如总统或州长，赋予。能够行使否决权是政府系统中关键的制衡机制，确保并非所有决策都可以在没有监督的情况下单方面作出。例如，在美国，总统有权对国会通过的法案行使否决权，从而阻止它们成为法律，除非国会能够以两院三分之二的多数票推翻否决。否决权的概念源于保护少数利益和防止多数暴政的愿望。通过允许一个人或小团体行使否决权，该系统旨在促进审议，鼓励立法者在制定立法之前考虑更广泛的观点。然而，这种权力也可能导致政治僵局，即重要措施因行政和立法部门之间的分歧而停滞不前。历史上，行使否决权的问题在许多政府中都是一个有争议的议题。例如，在美国共和国的早期，托马斯·杰斐逊总统以节俭的方式使用他的否决权，认为这应该仅限于最严重的情况。相比之下，近年来的总统则被知晓更频繁地行使否决权，反映出对行政权力更为积极使用的转变。此外，行使否决权的影响超出了简单的立法拒绝。它还可以影响政治关系和公众认知。当总统或州长选择行使否决权时，它向其选民和对手发出信号，表明他们的优先事项以及在某些政策上坚定立场的意愿。这一行为可能激励志同道合的人支持，同时又可能疏远那些支持被拒绝措施的人。在国际关系中，术语行使否决权具有额外的重要性，特别是在联合国安全理事会（UNSC）等组织中。在这里，五个常任理事国——中国、法国、俄罗斯、英国和美国——拥有对实质性决议行使否决权的权力。这种独特的结构意味着这些国家中的任何一个都可以阻止一项决议，无论其他成员国的多数意见如何。在这种背景下，行使否决权常常引发关于公平、代表性和全球治理有效性的辩论。总之，行使否决权的能力是政治系统中的一种强大工具，可以塑造立法和治理的进程。虽然它作为一种必要的保障，防止匆忙决策，但它也在政治合作和有效治理方面带来了挑战。理解这一权力的细微差别对于任何希望参与或分析政治过程的人来说都是至关重要的，无论是在地方、国家还是国际层面。随着社会的发展，围绕行使否决权的辩论可能会继续，反映出关于民主、代表性和问责制的更广泛讨论。