equidistant diplomacy

简明释义

等距离外交

英英释义

例句

1.Critics argue that equidistant diplomacy can lead to indecisiveness and a lack of clear foreign policy.

批评者认为，均衡外交可能导致优柔寡断和缺乏明确的外交政策。

2.In times of conflict, leaders may resort to equidistant diplomacy to avoid taking sides and to foster dialogue.

在冲突时期，领导人可能会采取均衡外交以避免偏袒任何一方，并促进对话。

3.The ambassador's role is crucial in implementing equidistant diplomacy to ensure that all parties feel heard.

大使在实施均衡外交方面的角色至关重要，以确保所有各方都感到受到重视。

4.By practicing equidistant diplomacy, the nation aims to strengthen its relationships with both neighboring countries.

通过实践均衡外交，该国旨在加强与两个邻国的关系。

5.The country's approach to international relations is often described as equidistant diplomacy, meaning it seeks to maintain a neutral stance between competing powers.

这个国家的国际关系方法常被描述为均衡外交，意味着它试图在竞争大国之间保持中立立场。

作文

In today's increasingly interconnected world, nations often find themselves balancing their relationships with multiple powers. One approach that has gained attention in recent years is known as equidistant diplomacy. This term refers to a diplomatic strategy where a country maintains a neutral stance towards conflicting parties, ensuring that it does not favor one side over the other. The concept is particularly relevant in regions where geopolitical tensions are high, and countries must navigate complex alliances and rivalries.For instance, consider a small nation situated between two larger, competing powers. If this nation opts for equidistant diplomacy, it would seek to foster good relations with both powers without explicitly aligning itself with either. This strategy can help prevent the smaller nation from becoming a pawn in a larger geopolitical game, allowing it to retain its sovereignty and agency.One of the primary benefits of equidistant diplomacy is that it enables a country to act as a mediator or facilitator in conflicts. By remaining neutral, the nation can offer its services to promote dialogue and negotiation between the rival parties. This role can enhance the country's international standing and provide it with leverage in future negotiations. For example, Switzerland is often cited as a model of equidistant diplomacy, given its long-standing tradition of neutrality and its successful mediation in various international disputes.However, practicing equidistant diplomacy is not without its challenges. Countries that adopt this approach may face pressure from both sides to take a definitive stance. Additionally, there is always the risk of being perceived as indecisive or lacking commitment to important global issues. Critics argue that true neutrality is difficult to maintain, especially when moral or ethical considerations come into play.Moreover, the effectiveness of equidistant diplomacy can vary depending on the specific context and the interests of the parties involved. In some cases, maintaining neutrality may lead to isolation, as allies may feel abandoned or betrayed by a lack of support. Thus, nations must carefully assess their situations before committing to this diplomatic strategy.In conclusion, equidistant diplomacy represents a nuanced approach to international relations, emphasizing balance and neutrality in a world often characterized by division and conflict. While it offers opportunities for mediation and enhanced international stature, it also requires careful management of relationships and expectations. As global dynamics continue to evolve, the relevance and application of equidistant diplomacy will likely remain a topic of discussion among scholars and practitioners alike.

在当今日益互联的世界中，各国常常需要平衡与多个大国的关系。近年来，一种被称为等距外交的方法引起了人们的关注。这个术语指的是一种外交策略，国家在冲突各方之间保持中立立场，确保其不偏向任何一方。这个概念在地缘政治紧张局势高涨的地区尤为相关，各国必须在复杂的联盟和对立之间航行。例如，考虑一个位于两个较大竞争大国之间的小国。如果这个国家选择等距外交，它将寻求与两个大国建立良好的关系，而不明确地与任何一方结盟。这一策略可以帮助小国避免成为更大地缘政治游戏中的棋子，从而保留其主权和自主性。等距外交的主要好处之一是，它使一个国家能够在冲突中充当调解者或促进者。通过保持中立，该国可以提供服务以促进对抗方之间的对话和谈判。这一角色可以提升该国的国际地位，并在未来的谈判中为其提供杠杆。例如，瑞士常常被视为等距外交的典范，因为它长期以来保持中立，并成功调解了各种国际争端。然而，实施等距外交并非没有挑战。采取这种方法的国家可能会面临来自双方的压力，要求其采取明确立场。此外，总是存在被视为优柔寡断或缺乏对重要全球问题承诺的风险。批评者认为，真正的中立很难维持，特别是在道德或伦理考量介入时。此外，等距外交的有效性可能因特定背景和相关方的利益而异。在某些情况下，保持中立可能导致孤立，因为盟友可能会因为缺乏支持而感到被抛弃或背叛。因此，各国必须在承诺这一外交策略之前仔细评估其情况。总之，等距外交代表了一种对国际关系的微妙处理方式，强调在一个常常被分裂和冲突特征所笼罩的世界中实现平衡和中立。虽然它为调解和增强国际声望提供了机会，但同时也需要谨慎管理关系和期望。随着全球动态的不断演变，等距外交的相关性和应用无疑将继续成为学者和从业者讨论的话题。