electoral vote
简明释义
选举人票
英英释义
An electoral vote is a vote cast by a member of the Electoral College in the United States, which is responsible for formally electing the President and Vice President. | 选举人票是美国选举团成员投出的票,负责正式选举总统和副总统。 |
例句
1.After the election, the media reported on how many electoral vote 选举人票 each candidate received.
选举结束后,媒体报道了每位候选人获得了多少选举人票选举人票。
2.Each state has a different number of electoral vote 选举人票, depending on its population.
每个州的选举人票选举人票数量不同,取决于其人口。
3.The electoral vote 选举人票 system can lead to a candidate winning the presidency without winning the popular vote.
由于选举人票选举人票系统的存在,候选人可能在没有赢得普选票的情况下赢得总统职位。
4.The candidate won the presidency by securing enough electoral vote 选举人票 to surpass the required majority.
候选人通过获得足够的选举人票选举人票超越所需的多数赢得了总统职位。
5.In the last election, the swing states played a crucial role in determining the electoral vote 选举人票 outcome.
在上次选举中,摇摆州在决定选举人票选举人票结果方面发挥了关键作用。
作文
The concept of electoral vote is crucial in understanding the American political system, particularly during presidential elections. The electoral vote refers to the mechanism established by the United States Constitution for the indirect election of the president and vice president of the country. Each state is allocated a number of electoral votes based on its representation in Congress, which equals the sum of its Senators (always two) and Representatives in the House. This means that larger states have more electoral votes, while smaller states have fewer, leading to a system where not every vote carries the same weight.During a presidential election, citizens cast their ballots for their preferred candidate. However, they are actually voting for a slate of electors pledged to support that candidate. These electors then cast the official electoral votes for their respective states. The total number of electoral votes is 538, and a majority of 270 is required to win the presidency. This system can lead to situations where a candidate wins the presidency without winning the popular vote, as seen in the elections of 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016.Critics of the electoral vote system argue that it undermines the principle of one person, one vote, as individuals in less populous states have a disproportionately higher influence on the outcome compared to those in more populous states. For example, a voter in Wyoming has significantly more electoral votes per capita than a voter in California. This discrepancy raises questions about the fairness and effectiveness of the electoral vote system.Supporters, however, contend that the electoral vote protects the interests of smaller states and encourages candidates to campaign in a wider variety of regions, rather than focusing solely on populous urban areas. This aspect of the system ensures that all voices are heard, regardless of population size. It also promotes a federalist approach to governance, acknowledging the diverse interests across different states.In recent years, there has been ongoing debate regarding the future of the electoral vote. Some propose reforms such as the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which aims to ensure that the presidency goes to the candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote. Others argue for maintaining the current system, citing its historical significance and the balance it provides between populous and less populous states.Ultimately, understanding the electoral vote is essential for grasping the complexities of American democracy. It reflects the country's commitment to a federalist system while also highlighting the challenges of ensuring equitable representation. As the nation moves forward, discussions about the electoral vote will likely continue, shaping the future of presidential elections in the United States.
“选举投票”这一概念在理解美国政治体系时至关重要,特别是在总统选举期间。“选举投票”指的是美国宪法规定的间接选举总统和副总统的机制。每个州根据其在国会的代表人数被分配一定数量的“选举投票”,其数量等于该州参议员(始终为两名)和众议院代表的总和。这意味着较大州拥有更多的“选举投票”,而较小州则较少,这导致了一个系统,其中并非每一票的权重相同。在总统选举期间,公民为他们首选的候选人投票。然而,他们实际上是在为一组承诺支持该候选人的选举人投票。这些选举人随后为各自的州投出正式的“选举投票”。“选举投票”的总数为538,赢得总统职位需要获得270票的多数。这一系统可能导致候选人在没有赢得普选票的情况下赢得总统职位的情况,如1824年、1876年、1888年、2000年和2016年的选举。批评“选举投票”系统的人认为,它削弱了“一人一票”的原则,因为人口较少州的个人对结果的影响与人口较多州的人相比不成比例。例如,怀俄明州的选民在每人拥有的“选举投票”方面远高于加利福尼亚州的选民。这种差异引发了关于“选举投票”系统公平性和有效性的质疑。然而,支持者认为“选举投票”保护了小州的利益,并鼓励候选人在更广泛的地区进行竞选,而不是仅仅集中在繁华的城市地区。这一系统的这一特性确保了所有声音都被听到,无论人口规模如何。它还促进了一种联邦主义的治理方式,承认不同州之间的多样化利益。近年来,关于“选举投票”未来的辩论持续不断。一些人提议改革,例如全国普选投票州际协议,旨在确保总统职位归赢得全国普选票的候选人所有。另一些人则主张维持当前系统,强调其历史意义和为人口多和少的州提供的平衡。最终,理解“选举投票”对于掌握美国民主的复杂性至关重要。它反映了国家对联邦制的承诺,同时也突显了确保公平代表性所面临的挑战。随着国家的发展,关于“选举投票”的讨论可能会继续,塑造美国总统选举的未来。
相关单词