diplomatic immunity

简明释义

外交豁免权

英英释义

例句

1.The incident raised questions about the limits of diplomatic immunity.

这一事件引发了对外交豁免权限制的质疑。

2.The ambassador was able to avoid arrest due to his diplomatic immunity.

大使因其外交豁免权而能够避免被逮捕。

3.The police were unable to question the suspect because of his diplomatic immunity.

由于嫌疑人享有外交豁免权，警方无法对他进行询问。

4.Many countries respect diplomatic immunity, which protects diplomats from legal action.

许多国家尊重外交豁免权，这保护了外交官免受法律诉讼。

5.She claimed diplomatic immunity when she was accused of traffic violations.

当她被指控违反交通规则时，她声称拥有外交豁免权。

作文

In today's increasingly interconnected world, the concept of diplomatic immunity plays a crucial role in maintaining international relations and ensuring the smooth functioning of diplomacy. diplomatic immunity refers to the legal protection afforded to diplomats and their families, which exempts them from certain laws and regulations of the host country. This principle is enshrined in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, established in 1961, which aims to facilitate diplomatic interactions by providing a safe environment for diplomats to perform their duties without fear of harassment or legal repercussions.The origins of diplomatic immunity can be traced back to ancient times when emissaries and envoys were granted safe passage to negotiate treaties and resolve conflicts. Over the centuries, this practice evolved into a formalized system that recognizes the importance of diplomacy in maintaining peace and stability among nations. Without diplomatic immunity, diplomats might be subjected to the laws of the host country, which could lead to potential conflicts and hinder their ability to carry out their responsibilities.However, the concept of diplomatic immunity is not without controversy. Critics argue that it can be misused by some diplomats who may engage in illegal activities, believing they are above the law. High-profile cases of diplomats committing crimes and evading justice have raised questions about the effectiveness and fairness of diplomatic immunity. For instance, there have been instances where diplomats involved in serious offenses, such as drug trafficking or assault, have escaped prosecution due to their protected status. This has led to calls for reform and greater accountability within the system.Supporters of diplomatic immunity, on the other hand, contend that it is essential for the functioning of international diplomacy. They argue that without these protections, diplomats would be vulnerable to political manipulation and persecution, which could jeopardize international relations. The principle ensures that diplomats can engage in open and honest dialogue, fostering cooperation and understanding between nations.Moreover, diplomatic immunity does not grant absolute freedom from all laws. Diplomats are still expected to adhere to the laws of the host country, and the immunity primarily covers official acts performed in the course of their duties. If a diplomat engages in personal conduct that violates local laws, the host country can declare them persona non grata, effectively expelling them from the country. This measure serves as a check on the potential abuse of diplomatic immunity while still protecting the essential functions of diplomacy.In conclusion, the concept of diplomatic immunity is a double-edged sword that balances the need for effective diplomacy with the necessity of accountability. While it provides essential protections for diplomats, it also raises important questions about justice and responsibility. As the world continues to evolve, it is crucial for international communities to address the challenges associated with diplomatic immunity and ensure that it serves its intended purpose of promoting peace and cooperation among nations, rather than becoming a loophole for misconduct. By fostering dialogue and understanding, we can work towards a more equitable system that respects the rule of law while upholding the vital role of diplomacy in our global society.

在当今日益互联的世界中，概念外交豁免权在维护国际关系和确保外交顺利运作方面发挥着至关重要的作用。外交豁免权是指给予外交官及其家属的法律保护，使其免受东道国某些法律和法规的约束。这一原则载于1961年制定的《维也纳外交关系公约》，旨在通过为外交官提供一个安全的环境，使其能够在没有骚扰或法律后果的情况下履行职责，从而促进外交互动。外交豁免权的起源可以追溯到古代，当时使者和特使被授予安全通行权，以便谈判条约和解决冲突。几个世纪以来，这一做法演变为一个正式的系统，承认外交在维护国家之间和平与稳定中的重要性。如果没有外交豁免权，外交官可能会受到东道国法律的约束，这可能导致潜在的冲突并妨碍他们履行职责。然而，外交豁免权的概念并非没有争议。批评者认为，一些外交官可能会滥用这一权利，参与非法活动，认为自己高于法律。涉及外交官犯罪和逃避正义的高调案件引发了对外交豁免权有效性和公平性的质疑。例如，曾有一些外交官涉及严重犯罪，如毒品贩运或攻击，但由于他们受到保护身份的庇护而逃避起诉。这导致了对改革和加强问责制的呼声。另一方面，外交豁免权的支持者认为，这对国际外交的运作至关重要。他们辩称，如果没有这些保护，外交官将面临政治操控和迫害的风险，这可能危及国际关系。该原则确保外交官能够进行开放和诚实的对话，促进国家之间的合作与理解。此外，外交豁免权并不赋予绝对的法律自由。外交官仍然被期望遵守东道国的法律，而豁免主要涵盖其在履行职责过程中所做的官方行为。如果外交官参与违反当地法律的个人行为，东道国可以宣布其为不受欢迎的人，有效地将其驱逐出境。这一措施作为对外交豁免权潜在滥用的制衡，同时仍然保护外交的基本职能。总之，外交豁免权的概念是一把双刃剑，平衡了有效外交的需求与问责制的必要性。虽然它为外交官提供了必要的保护，但也提出了关于正义和责任的重要问题。随着世界的不断发展，国际社会必须应对与外交豁免权相关的挑战，并确保其服务于促进国家间和平与合作的预期目的，而不是成为不端行为的漏洞。通过促进对话和理解，我们可以朝着一个更加公平的系统努力，既尊重法治，又维护外交在全球社会中的重要角色。