closed-door policy

简明释义

闭关政策

英英释义

例句

1.The company implemented a closed-door policy to ensure confidential discussions remained private.

公司实施了闭门政策以确保机密讨论保持私密。

2.In response to the crisis, the government enforced a closed-door policy for all decision-making sessions.

为了应对危机，政府对所有决策会议实施了闭门政策。

3.During the negotiations, they adopted a closed-door policy to prevent leaks to the media.

在谈判期间，他们采取了闭门政策以防止信息泄漏给媒体。

4.The school's administration decided on a closed-door policy for disciplinary meetings to protect student privacy.

学校管理层决定对纪律会议采取闭门政策以保护学生隐私。

5.The board meeting was conducted under a closed-door policy to discuss sensitive financial matters.

董事会会议在闭门政策下进行，以讨论敏感的财务问题。

作文

The term closed-door policy refers to a strategy or approach where a country, organization, or institution restricts access to its internal affairs or decisions from external parties. This policy is often implemented to maintain control over sensitive information and to protect national security interests. One of the most notable examples of a closed-door policy in history was the isolationist stance taken by Japan during the Edo period, which lasted from the early 17th century until the mid-19th century. During this time, Japan limited foreign influence and trade, allowing only a few Dutch and Chinese merchants to engage with them at designated ports. This policy was aimed at preserving Japanese culture and preventing the spread of foreign ideologies, particularly Christianity.In modern times, the concept of a closed-door policy can also be observed in various political and corporate environments. For instance, some governments may choose to implement this policy to avoid international scrutiny or criticism regarding their human rights records or political practices. By keeping foreign observers at bay, they can operate without external pressure or interference. Similarly, companies may adopt a closed-door policy during sensitive negotiations or internal decision-making processes to prevent leaks of confidential information that could jeopardize their competitive edge.However, the implications of a closed-door policy can be both positive and negative. On one hand, it allows for greater autonomy and the ability to make decisions without outside influence. This can lead to more cohesive and unified strategies, especially in situations where rapid decision-making is crucial. On the other hand, such a policy can foster an environment of secrecy and distrust. When stakeholders, whether they be citizens, employees, or investors, are kept in the dark, it can lead to speculation, misinformation, and ultimately, a breakdown of trust.Moreover, in an increasingly interconnected world, the effectiveness of a closed-door policy is often challenged. Globalization has made it difficult for nations and organizations to operate in isolation. Information flows freely across borders, and the actions of one entity can have far-reaching consequences on others. As a result, many argue that a more open and transparent approach is necessary to foster cooperation and understanding among different parties.In conclusion, while the closed-door policy can serve as a protective measure for countries and organizations, it is essential to weigh its advantages against its potential drawbacks. The balance between maintaining privacy and fostering transparency is a delicate one. As the world continues to evolve, the necessity for open dialogue and collaboration may outweigh the benefits of isolationist policies. Ultimately, the success of any policy, including the closed-door policy, depends on the context in which it is applied and the willingness of those involved to adapt to changing circumstances.

“闭门政策”一词指的是一个国家、组织或机构限制外部方对其内部事务或决策的访问的一种策略或方法。这种政策通常是为了维护对敏感信息的控制和保护国家安全利益。在历史上，“闭门政策”的一个显著例子是日本在江户时代采取的孤立主义立场，这一时期持续了从17世纪初到19世纪中叶。在此期间，日本限制外国影响和贸易，仅允许少数荷兰和中国商人与他们在指定港口进行交易。这项政策旨在保护日本文化，防止外国意识形态的传播，特别是基督教。在现代，“闭门政策”这一概念也可以在各种政治和企业环境中观察到。例如，一些政府可能选择实施这一政策，以避免国际社会对其人权记录或政治做法的审查或批评。通过将外国观察者拒之门外，他们可以在没有外部压力或干预的情况下运作。同样，公司在敏感的谈判或内部决策过程中也可能采取“闭门政策”，以防止机密信息泄露，从而危及其竞争优势。然而，“闭门政策”的影响可能是积极的，也可能是消极的。一方面，它允许更大的自主权，并能够在没有外部影响的情况下做出决策。这可以导致更具凝聚力和统一性的战略，特别是在快速决策至关重要的情况下。另一方面，这种政策可能会滋生一种秘密和不信任的环境。当利益相关者，无论是公民、员工还是投资者，被蒙在鼓里时，这可能导致猜测、错误信息，最终导致信任的崩溃。此外，在一个日益互联的世界中，“闭门政策”的有效性常常受到挑战。全球化使得国家和组织在孤立中运作变得困难。信息自由流动于国界之间，一个实体的行为可能对其他实体产生深远的影响。因此，许多人认为，更开放和透明的方法是促进不同方之间合作和理解的必要条件。总之，虽然“闭门政策”可以作为国家和组织的一种保护措施，但必须权衡其优势与潜在缺点。保持隐私与促进透明之间的平衡是微妙的。随着世界的不断发展，开放对话与合作的必要性可能超过孤立政策的好处。最终，任何政策的成功，包括“闭门政策”，都取决于其应用的背景以及相关方适应变化环境的意愿。