across-the-board cut

简明释义

全面削减

英英释义

例句

1.After reviewing expenses, the manager decided to make an across-the-board cut in travel budgets for all departments.

在审查费用后，经理决定对所有部门的差旅预算进行全方位的削减。

2.The government proposed an across-the-board cut in taxes to stimulate the economy.

政府提议进行全方位的削减税收以刺激经济。

3.The nonprofit organization faced funding issues and had to implement an across-the-board cut in staff hours.

该非营利组织面临资金问题，不得不对员工工时实施全方位的削减。

4.Due to budget constraints, the school implemented an across-the-board cut in funding for all extracurricular activities.

由于预算限制，学校对所有课外活动实施了全方位的削减资金。

5.The company announced an across-the-board cut in salaries to combat the financial crisis.

公司宣布进行全方位的削减工资，以应对金融危机。

作文

In recent years, many organizations and governments have faced challenging financial situations that necessitate difficult decisions regarding budgets. One common approach to address these financial challenges is through an across-the-board cut. This term refers to a uniform reduction in budget allocations across all departments or areas of an organization, rather than targeting specific programs or initiatives. While this approach can simplify the decision-making process, it also raises questions about fairness and effectiveness.When an across-the-board cut is implemented, every department experiences the same percentage reduction in funding. For example, if a government decides to reduce its overall budget by 10%, each department would receive 10% less funding than the previous year. This method is often seen as a way to ensure that no single area is disproportionately affected, promoting a sense of equity among departments. However, it can also lead to significant challenges.One major issue with across-the-board cuts is that they do not take into account the varying needs and priorities of different departments. For instance, a public health department may require more resources during a health crisis, while a recreational department might be able to function with less funding. By applying the same percentage cut across the board, critical services may suffer, as essential programs might be forced to operate with inadequate resources.Moreover, across-the-board cuts can hinder innovation and improvement within organizations. Departments that are already underfunded may struggle even more to meet their objectives, leading to a decline in overall performance. Instead of fostering growth and development, these cuts can create a stagnant environment where departments are unable to adapt to new challenges or improve their services.Another concern is the impact on employee morale. When employees see that their department is receiving the same cut as others, it can create a sense of hopelessness and frustration. They may feel that their hard work and achievements are not being recognized, leading to decreased motivation and productivity. In contrast, targeted cuts that consider individual department needs may allow for a more strategic approach, where employees can see that their contributions are valued.In conclusion, while across-the-board cuts may seem like a straightforward solution to budgetary constraints, they often fail to address the unique needs of different departments. This one-size-fits-all approach can lead to unintended consequences, including reduced service quality, hindered innovation, and lower employee morale. As organizations navigate financial difficulties, it is essential to consider more nuanced strategies that prioritize the most critical areas while still achieving necessary budget reductions. Only by doing so can organizations ensure that they continue to serve their communities effectively and efficiently, even in challenging times.

近年来，许多组织和政府面临着艰难的财务状况，这迫使他们在预算方面做出困难的决定。应对这些财务挑战的一种常见方法是通过全方位削减。这个术语指的是在组织的所有部门或领域中进行统一的预算削减，而不是针对特定的项目或倡议。这种方法虽然可以简化决策过程，但也引发了关于公平性和有效性的问题。当实施全方位削减时，每个部门都经历相同百分比的资金减少。例如，如果一个政府决定将整体预算减少10%，那么每个部门的资金将比前一年少10%。这种方法通常被视为确保没有单一领域受到不成比例影响的一种方式，促进部门之间的公平感。然而，这也可能导致重大挑战。全方位削减的一个主要问题是，它没有考虑到不同部门的不同需求和优先事项。例如，在健康危机期间，公共卫生部门可能需要更多资源，而休闲部门可能能够以较少的资金运作。通过对所有部门施加相同的百分比削减，关键服务可能会受到影响，因为重要项目可能被迫以不足的资源运作。此外，全方位削减可能会阻碍组织内部的创新和改善。已经资金不足的部门可能会更加努力地达到其目标，从而导致整体表现下降。这些削减不仅没有促进增长和发展，反而可能创造出一个停滞的环境，使得各部门无法适应新挑战或改善其服务。另一个担忧是对员工士气的影响。当员工看到他们的部门与其他部门获得相同的削减时，这可能会产生绝望和挫败感。他们可能会觉得自己的辛勤工作和成就没有得到认可，从而导致动力和生产力下降。相比之下，考虑到各部门需求的有针对性的削减可能允许更具战略性的方法，让员工看到他们的贡献得到重视。总之，尽管全方位削减看似是解决预算约束的简单方案，但它往往未能满足不同部门的独特需求。这种一刀切的方法可能导致意想不到的后果，包括服务质量下降、创新受阻和员工士气降低。当组织在财务困难中航行时，考虑更细致的策略以优先考虑最关键的领域，同时实现必要的预算削减是至关重要的。只有这样，组织才能确保在困难时期继续有效和高效地服务于其社区。