tying contract

简明释义

附有条件的合同

英英释义

例句

1.Many customers were unhappy about the tying contract requirements for purchasing the latest smartphone.

许多客户对购买最新智能手机的绑定合同要求感到不满。

2.The legal team is reviewing the tying contract to ensure compliance with antitrust laws.

法律团队正在审查绑定合同以确保符合反垄断法。

3.The company offered a discount on the new software only if customers signed a tying contract with their hardware products.

该公司仅在客户与其硬件产品签订绑定合同时，才提供新软件的折扣。

4.In order to get the best deal, the customer had to agree to a tying contract that included multiple services.

为了获得最佳交易，客户必须同意包含多项服务的绑定合同。

5.The tying contract between the cable provider and the internet service was criticized for limiting consumer choices.

有线电视提供商与互联网服务之间的绑定合同因限制消费者选择而受到批评。

作文

In the realm of business and economics, the concept of a tying contract plays a significant role in understanding how companies can influence consumer behavior and market dynamics. A tying contract is an agreement that requires a buyer to purchase a secondary product or service as a condition for obtaining a desired primary product or service. This practice is often seen in various industries, ranging from software to consumer goods, and it raises important questions about market competition and consumer rights.To illustrate the workings of a tying contract, consider a scenario where a popular software company offers a powerful word processing application. In order to access this application, customers are required to also purchase a subscription to a cloud storage service provided by the same company. Here, the primary product is the word processing application, while the cloud storage service is the tied product. This arrangement can be advantageous for the company as it ensures a steady stream of revenue from both products, but it may also limit consumer choice and lead to higher prices.Critics of tying contracts argue that they can create monopolistic practices, where consumers feel forced to buy additional products they may not need or want. This can stifle competition, as smaller companies may struggle to compete against larger firms that have the resources to bundle their products in such a manner. Furthermore, consumers may end up paying more than they would if they could purchase each product independently.On the other hand, proponents of tying contracts suggest that they can enhance consumer convenience and promote product integration. For example, when a customer buys a printer, they may be offered a deal that includes ink cartridges at a reduced price if they agree to buy them exclusively from the manufacturer. This can simplify the purchasing process for consumers and ensure that they receive compatible products that work well together.The legality of tying contracts varies by jurisdiction and often hinges on whether the practice is deemed anti-competitive. In many countries, regulatory bodies closely examine such agreements to determine if they violate antitrust laws. For instance, if a company holds a dominant market position and uses a tying contract to leverage its power, it may face legal challenges. The goal of these regulations is to protect consumers and maintain a level playing field in the marketplace.In conclusion, a tying contract is a complex legal and economic tool that can have significant implications for both businesses and consumers. While it may offer certain advantages, such as increased convenience and potential cost savings, it also poses risks related to competition and consumer choice. As the marketplace continues to evolve, the discussion surrounding tying contracts will remain relevant, highlighting the need for ongoing scrutiny and regulation to ensure fair practices in commerce.

在商业和经济领域，捆绑合同的概念在理解公司如何影响消费者行为和市场动态方面发挥着重要作用。捆绑合同是指一种协议，要求买方在获得所需的主要产品或服务时，必须购买附加的产品或服务。这种做法在软件到消费品等各个行业中都可以看到，并且它引发了关于市场竞争和消费者权利的重要问题。为了说明捆绑合同的运作方式，考虑一个场景：一家知名软件公司提供强大的文字处理应用程序。为了访问该应用程序，客户被要求同时购买该公司提供的云存储服务的订阅。在这里，主要产品是文字处理应用程序，而云存储服务是捆绑产品。这种安排对公司来说可能是有利的，因为它确保了来自两个产品的稳定收入流，但它也可能限制消费者选择并导致价格上涨。捆绑合同的批评者认为，这可能会造成垄断行为，消费者感到被迫购买他们可能不需要或不想要的附加产品。这可能会抑制竞争，因为较小的公司可能难以与拥有资源以这种方式捆绑其产品的大型公司竞争。此外，消费者可能最终支付的费用超过了如果他们能够独立购买每个产品时的费用。另一方面，捆绑合同的支持者认为，它们可以增强消费者便利性并促进产品整合。例如，当客户购买打印机时，他们可能会获得一项交易，如果同意仅从制造商那里购买墨盒，则可以以折扣价购买墨盒。这可以简化消费者的购买过程，并确保他们获得兼容的、能够良好配合的产品。捆绑合同的合法性因司法管辖区而异，通常取决于这种做法是否被视为反竞争行为。在许多国家，监管机构密切审查此类协议，以确定它们是否违反反垄断法。例如，如果一家公司在市场上占据主导地位并利用捆绑合同来利用其权力，它可能面临法律挑战。这些法规的目的是保护消费者并维护市场中的公平竞争环境。总之，捆绑合同是一种复杂的法律和经济工具，对企业和消费者都有重大影响。虽然它可能提供某些优势，例如增加便利性和潜在的成本节约，但它也带来了与竞争和消费者选择相关的风险。随着市场的不断发展，围绕捆绑合同的讨论将继续保持相关性，突显出对公平商业实践进行持续审查和监管的必要性。