to refer to arbitration

简明释义

交与仲裁解决

英英释义

例句

1.They decided to refer the matter to arbitration after lengthy negotiations failed.

在漫长的谈判失败后，他们决定将此事提交仲裁。

2.The company’s policy is to refer to arbitration for all contractual disputes.

公司的政策是对于所有合同争议提交仲裁。

3.In case of a disagreement, both parties have agreed to refer to arbitration.

如果出现分歧，双方已同意提交仲裁。

4.If we cannot reach an agreement, we may need to refer to arbitration.

如果我们无法达成协议，我们可能需要将其提交仲裁。

5.The contract includes a clause that states disputes will be referred to arbitration.

合同中包含一项条款，规定争议将被提交仲裁。

作文

In today's world, where disputes and conflicts are common in various sectors, it is crucial to find effective methods to resolve these issues. One such method is arbitration, which is increasingly becoming a popular choice for many individuals and organizations. When parties involved in a dispute choose to settle their differences outside of court, they often decide to refer to arbitration. This term refers to the process of submitting a dispute to an impartial third party, known as an arbitrator, who makes a binding decision on the matter. The benefits of arbitration over traditional litigation are numerous, making it an attractive option for resolving conflicts.Firstly, arbitration is generally faster than going through the court system. Legal proceedings can drag on for months or even years, causing frustration and uncertainty for those involved. By choosing to refer to arbitration, parties can expedite the resolution process significantly. The arbitrator typically sets a timeline for the proceedings, ensuring that the case is heard and decided in a timely manner.Secondly, arbitration is often more cost-effective than litigation. Court fees, attorney's fees, and other associated costs can quickly add up when pursuing a lawsuit. In contrast, arbitration usually has lower overall expenses, making it a more financially viable option for many. Parties can save money while still achieving a fair resolution by opting to refer to arbitration instead of engaging in a lengthy court battle.Moreover, arbitration offers a level of confidentiality that is not always available in court. Court proceedings are usually public, meaning that the details of the dispute can be made accessible to anyone. However, when parties choose to refer to arbitration, the process is private, and the details of the case are kept confidential. This aspect is particularly important for businesses that may want to protect sensitive information or maintain their reputation during a dispute.Additionally, arbitration allows the parties to have more control over the resolution process. In a court setting, the judge makes decisions based on legal precedents and statutory law, which may not always align with the parties' interests. However, when parties agree to refer to arbitration, they can select an arbitrator with specific expertise related to their dispute. This ensures that the decision-maker understands the nuances of the case and can provide a more informed ruling.Despite its many advantages, some may argue that arbitration has its drawbacks. For instance, the lack of a formal appeal process can be concerning for some parties. Once an arbitrator makes a decision, it is typically final and binding, leaving little room for recourse if one party is unhappy with the outcome. However, this finality can also be seen as a benefit, as it encourages parties to fully engage in the arbitration process and work towards a mutually agreeable solution.In conclusion, the decision to refer to arbitration can be a wise choice for those facing disputes. With its speed, cost-effectiveness, confidentiality, and the ability to choose an expert arbitrator, arbitration presents a compelling alternative to traditional court litigation. As more individuals and organizations recognize the benefits of this method, it is likely that arbitration will continue to gain popularity as a preferred means of conflict resolution in the future.

在当今世界，各个领域的争议和冲突普遍存在，因此找到有效的方法来解决这些问题至关重要。其中一种方法是仲裁，越来越多的人和组织选择这一方式。当涉及争议的各方决定在法庭外解决分歧时，他们通常会选择将争议提交仲裁。这个术语指的是将争议提交给一个公正的第三方，即仲裁员，由他对该问题作出具有约束力的决定。仲裁相较于传统诉讼的好处有很多，使其成为解决冲突的一个有吸引力的选择。首先，仲裁通常比通过法院系统更快。法律程序可能会拖延数月甚至数年，这让当事人感到沮丧和不确定。通过选择将争议提交仲裁，当事方可以显著加快解决过程。仲裁员通常会设定程序的时间表，确保案件能够及时听取和裁决。其次，仲裁通常比诉讼更具成本效益。诉讼费、律师费和其他相关费用在追求诉讼时可能迅速增加。相比之下，仲裁通常整体费用较低，使其对许多人来说是一种更具财务可行性的选择。通过选择将争议提交仲裁，当事方可以节省资金，同时仍然实现公平的解决方案。此外，仲裁提供了一个在法庭上并不总是可用的保密程度。法庭程序通常是公开的，这意味着争议的细节可以被任何人访问。然而，当各方选择将争议提交仲裁时，过程是私密的，案件的细节得以保密。这一点对于希望保护敏感信息或在争议中维护声誉的企业尤其重要。另外，仲裁允许各方对解决过程有更多的控制权。在法庭环境中，法官根据法律先例和法定法律做出决定，这可能并不总是与当事方的利益一致。然而，当各方同意将争议提交仲裁时，他们可以选择一位在其争议相关领域具有特定专业知识的仲裁员。这确保了决策者理解案件的细微差别，并能够提供更为知情的裁决。尽管有许多优点，但一些人可能会争辩说仲裁也有其缺点。例如，缺乏正式的上诉程序可能会让某些当事方感到担忧。一旦仲裁员做出决定，通常是最终的和具有约束力的，如果一方对结果不满，几乎没有救济的余地。然而，这种最终性也可以被视为一种好处，因为它鼓励当事方充分参与仲裁过程，并努力达成彼此都能接受的解决方案。总之，选择将争议提交仲裁的决定对于面临争议的人来说可能是明智的选择。鉴于其速度、成本效益、保密性和选择专家仲裁员的能力，仲裁为传统法庭诉讼提供了一种引人注目的替代方案。随着越来越多的个人和组织认识到这一方法的好处，仲裁很可能在未来继续作为首选的冲突解决手段而日益受到欢迎。