sever diplomatic relations

简明释义

断绝外交关系

英英释义

例句

1.Following the assassination of the ambassador, the nation had no choice but to sever diplomatic relations 切断外交关系.

在大使被刺杀后，该国别无选择，只能切断外交关系。

2.After the military coup, several nations decided to sever diplomatic relations 切断外交关系 with the new regime.

军方政变后，几个国家决定与新政权切断外交关系。

3.The government announced that it would sever diplomatic relations 切断外交关系 with the country due to ongoing human rights violations.

政府宣布将因持续的人权侵犯与该国切断外交关系。

4.In protest of the invasion, the alliance chose to sever diplomatic relations 切断外交关系 with the aggressor state.

为了抗议入侵，该联盟选择与侵略国切断外交关系。

5.The recent scandal prompted the country to sever diplomatic relations 切断外交关系 with its long-time ally.

最近的丑闻促使该国与长期盟友切断外交关系。

作文

The concept of diplomacy is fundamental in maintaining peaceful and cooperative relations between nations. However, there are times when countries find it necessary to take drastic measures due to various conflicts or disagreements. One such measure is to sever diplomatic relations, which means to officially break off all diplomatic ties with another country. This action can have significant implications not only for the countries involved but also for the international community as a whole.Historically, nations have chosen to sever diplomatic relations for various reasons, including military conflicts, political disagreements, or violations of international law. For instance, during the Cold War, numerous countries found themselves in situations where they had to cut diplomatic ties with others due to ideological differences. The consequences of such actions can be severe, leading to economic sanctions, trade restrictions, and a lack of communication that can exacerbate tensions.When a nation decides to sever diplomatic relations, it often signals a breakdown in trust and cooperation. This can lead to a situation where misunderstandings and miscommunications escalate, potentially resulting in conflict. For example, if two neighboring countries are unable to communicate effectively due to severed diplomatic ties, they may misinterpret each other's military movements or political statements, leading to unnecessary hostilities.Furthermore, the act of severing diplomatic relations can also impact global stability. Many international organizations rely on diplomatic channels to facilitate dialogue and resolve conflicts. When countries choose to sever diplomatic relations, they may withdraw from these organizations, making it more challenging to address global issues such as climate change, terrorism, and human rights abuses. This withdrawal can create a vacuum in leadership and cooperation, leaving unresolved problems that could escalate into larger crises.In addition to the political and economic ramifications, severing diplomatic relations can also affect the lives of ordinary citizens. When countries cut diplomatic ties, it can lead to the expulsion of diplomats and the withdrawal of consular services. This means that citizens traveling or living abroad may find themselves without assistance in times of need. Families may become separated, and students studying in foreign countries might face uncertainty about their future.Despite the potential consequences, there are instances where severing diplomatic relations can be justified. If a country engages in aggressive actions or violates human rights, other nations may feel compelled to take a stand by cutting ties. This can serve as a form of protest and a way to apply pressure for change. However, it is crucial to weigh the benefits against the potential fallout, as the long-term effects can be detrimental to both parties involved.In conclusion, the decision to sever diplomatic relations is a serious one that carries far-reaching consequences. While it may be necessary in certain situations, it is essential for nations to approach this action with caution and consider the broader implications for regional and global stability. Diplomacy remains a vital tool in resolving conflicts and fostering cooperation, and maintaining open lines of communication should always be a priority whenever possible.

外交的概念对于维持国家之间和平与合作的关系至关重要。然而，有时国家由于各种冲突或分歧而发现有必要采取激烈的措施。其中一种措施就是断绝外交关系，这意味着正式中断与另一个国家的所有外交关系。这一行动不仅对涉及的国家产生重大影响，也对整个国际社会产生深远的影响。历史上，各国因军事冲突、政治分歧或违反国际法等各种原因选择断绝外交关系。例如，在冷战期间，许多国家由于意识形态差异不得不切断与其他国家的外交关系。这种行为的后果可能是严重的，导致经济制裁、贸易限制以及缺乏沟通，从而加剧紧张局势。当一个国家决定断绝外交关系时，往往意味着信任与合作的破裂。这可能导致误解和误传的情况升级，潜在地导致冲突。例如，如果两个邻国由于断绝外交关系而无法有效沟通，它们可能会误解对方的军事行动或政治声明，从而导致不必要的敌对行为。此外，断绝外交关系的行为还可能影响全球稳定。许多国际组织依赖外交渠道来促进对话和解决冲突。当国家选择断绝外交关系时，它们可能会退出这些组织，使得解决气候变化、恐怖主义和人权侵犯等全球问题变得更加困难。这种撤退可能会造成领导力和合作的真空，留下未解决的问题，这些问题可能会升级为更大的危机。除了政治和经济影响外，断绝外交关系也会影响普通公民的生活。当国家切断外交关系时，可能会导致外交官被驱逐和领事服务的撤回。这意味着在国外旅行或生活的公民在需要时可能找不到帮助。家庭可能会分离，正在外国学习的学生可能会面临未来的不确定性。尽管潜在后果，某些情况下断绝外交关系是可以被合理化的。如果一个国家采取侵略性行动或侵犯人权，其他国家可能会感到有必要通过切断关系来采取立场。这可以作为一种抗议形式，并施加压力以促成改变。然而，重要的是要权衡利益与潜在后果，因为长期影响可能对双方都是有害的。总之，断绝外交关系的决定是一个严肃的决定，带来了深远的后果。虽然在某些情况下可能是必要的，但各国在采取这一行动时应谨慎行事，并考虑对地区和全球稳定的更广泛影响。外交仍然是解决冲突和促进合作的重要工具，维护开放的沟通渠道应始终是优先事项。