sentence in absence

简明释义

缺席判决

英英释义

例句

1.The lawyer argued that the sentence in absence was unfair due to lack of representation.

律师辩称，由于缺乏代理，缺席判决是不公正的。

2.In some cases, a sentence in absence can lead to harsher penalties.

在某些情况下，缺席判决可能导致更严厉的惩罚。

3.After reviewing the evidence, the court decided to proceed with a sentence in absence.

审查证据后，法院决定继续进行缺席判决。

4.A sentence in absence can be appealed if the defendant has valid reasons for not attending.

如果被告有合理的缺席理由，可以对缺席判决提出上诉。

5.The judge issued a sentence in absence for the defendant who failed to appear in court.

法官对未能出庭的被告下达了缺席判决。

作文

In the world of law, a sentence in absence refers to a judicial decision made without the presence of the accused. This situation often arises when a defendant fails to appear in court for their trial or hearing. The implications of such a sentence can be significant, as it may lead to a conviction and punishment without the opportunity for the defendant to defend themselves. Understanding this concept is crucial, especially for those studying law or involved in legal proceedings.The principle behind a sentence in absence is rooted in the idea that the judicial system must continue to function efficiently. Courts cannot indefinitely delay proceedings due to the non-appearance of a defendant. However, this raises questions about fairness and justice. How can one be fairly judged without being present to hear the charges and present a defense? This dilemma highlights the balance that courts must strike between maintaining order and ensuring that every individual’s rights are protected.In many jurisdictions, there are specific rules governing how a sentence in absence is issued. For instance, a judge may require that the defendant be formally notified of the trial date and the consequences of failing to appear. If the defendant still does not show up, the court may proceed with the case and issue a sentence based on the evidence presented. This process underscores the importance of legal representation and the need for defendants to remain engaged in their cases.Moreover, the aftermath of a sentence in absence can vary. In some instances, a defendant may choose to appeal the decision, arguing that they were not given a fair chance to defend themselves. Depending on the jurisdiction, the appeals court may overturn the original ruling or order a new trial where the defendant can be present. This potential for redress is an essential aspect of the legal system, providing a safety net for those who may have been unjustly convicted in their absence.Additionally, the societal implications of a sentence in absence are worth exploring. When individuals are sentenced without their presence, it can lead to feelings of mistrust towards the legal system. People may believe that justice is not being served, particularly if they feel that the process was rushed or unfair. This perception can erode public confidence in the judiciary, leading to broader issues around compliance with the law and respect for legal institutions.In conclusion, a sentence in absence is a complex legal concept that encapsulates the tension between efficiency in judicial proceedings and the fundamental rights of individuals. While it serves a practical purpose in maintaining the flow of court cases, it also raises important questions about fairness and justice. As society continues to evolve, so too must our understanding and handling of such sentences, ensuring that the rights of all individuals are upheld, even in their absence. Legal systems must strive to balance these competing interests, ultimately fostering a more equitable environment for all participants in the judicial process.

在法律的世界中，缺席判决是指在被告缺席的情况下作出的司法决定。这种情况通常发生在被告未能出庭参加审判或听证会时。这样的判决可能会产生重大影响，因为它可能导致被告在没有机会为自己辩护的情况下被定罪和处罚。理解这一概念至关重要，尤其是对于那些学习法律或参与法律程序的人来说。缺席判决的原则根植于司法系统必须高效运作的思想。法院不能因为被告未出现而无限期延迟诉讼。然而，这引发了关于公平和正义的问题。在没有出庭听取指控和提出辩护的情况下，如何能够公正地判断一个人？这一困境突显了法院在维持秩序与确保每个人的权利受到保护之间必须寻求的平衡。在许多法域中，关于如何发出缺席判决有特定的规则。例如，法官可能要求正式通知被告审判日期及未出庭的后果。如果被告仍然未出现，法院可以继续进行案件，并根据提出的证据作出判决。这个过程强调了法律代理的重要性，以及被告在案件中保持参与的必要性。此外，缺席判决的后果可能各不相同。在某些情况下，被告可能选择上诉，争辩他们没有得到公平的辩护机会。根据法域的不同，上诉法院可能会推翻原判决或命令重新审判，使被告可以出庭。这种救济的潜力是法律系统的重要方面，为那些可能在缺席时被不公正定罪的人提供了安全网。此外，缺席判决的社会影响也值得探讨。当个人在缺席的情况下被判决时，可能会导致对法律系统的不信任。人们可能会认为正义没有得到伸张，特别是如果他们觉得流程仓促或不公平。这种看法可能会侵蚀公众对司法的信心，导致更广泛的遵法和尊重法律机构的问题。总之，缺席判决是一个复杂的法律概念，体现了司法程序效率与个人基本权利之间的紧张关系。虽然它在保持法庭案件流动方面发挥了实际作用，但它也引发了关于公平和正义的重要问题。随着社会的不断发展，我们对这类判决的理解和处理也必须不断演进，确保所有个人的权利在缺席时也能得到维护。法律系统必须努力在这些竞争利益之间取得平衡，最终为司法过程中所有参与者营造一个更公平的环境。