selective release

简明释义

选择性脱扣

英英释义

例句

1.The film studio opted for a selective release of the movie to build anticipation before the wide release.

电影制片厂选择了选择性发布这部电影，以在广泛上映之前营造期待感。

2.Due to regulatory issues, the selective release of the drug was limited to certain demographics.

由于监管问题，这种药物的选择性发布仅限于某些人群。

3.The tech firm implemented a selective release of its software update to avoid overwhelming users with changes.

该科技公司实施了选择性发布其软件更新，以避免用户因变化而不知所措。

4.The company decided on a selective release strategy to launch its new product only in major cities.

公司决定采用选择性发布策略，仅在主要城市推出其新产品。

5.In academic publishing, selective release of research findings can help manage public perception.

在学术出版中，选择性发布研究结果可以帮助管理公众认知。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, information is both abundant and easily accessible. However, not all information is created equal, and the way it is disseminated can significantly impact public perception and understanding. One concept that has gained traction in various fields, including politics, media, and science, is selective release. This term refers to the practice of releasing specific pieces of information while withholding others, often to shape a narrative or influence opinions. Understanding selective release is crucial for navigating the complexities of information in our society.The phenomenon of selective release can be observed in political communication, where leaders may choose to disclose only favorable statistics or outcomes while ignoring less favorable data. For example, during an election campaign, a candidate might highlight their achievements in job creation but fail to mention rising unemployment rates in certain demographics. This tactic can create a skewed perception of reality, leading voters to make decisions based on incomplete information.Similarly, in the media landscape, news outlets often engage in selective release by choosing which stories to cover and how to frame them. This can result in a biased portrayal of events, as certain angles may be emphasized while others are downplayed or ignored. For instance, coverage of a protest may focus on instances of violence rather than the peaceful messages being conveyed, thus shaping public opinion in a particular direction.In the realm of scientific research, selective release can occur when researchers publish only positive results while suppressing negative findings. This practice, known as publication bias, can distort the scientific literature and lead to an inaccurate understanding of a given field. For instance, a pharmaceutical company may only publish studies that demonstrate the efficacy of a new drug, neglecting to share data that shows adverse effects or lack of effectiveness in certain populations. Such practices can have serious implications for public health and safety, as they hinder the ability of healthcare professionals and patients to make informed decisions.The implications of selective release extend beyond individual cases; they can influence societal norms and values. When people are consistently exposed to curated information, they may develop a distorted view of reality. This can lead to polarization, as individuals become entrenched in their beliefs and dismiss opposing viewpoints. Furthermore, selective release can erode trust in institutions, as people may feel manipulated or deceived by those in power who control the flow of information.To counteract the effects of selective release, it is essential for individuals to cultivate critical thinking skills and seek out diverse sources of information. Engaging with multiple perspectives can help paint a more comprehensive picture of complex issues. Additionally, transparency in communication, whether in politics, media, or research, is vital for fostering trust and accountability. By advocating for open dialogue and the sharing of all relevant information, society can work towards a more informed and engaged citizenry.In conclusion, selective release is a powerful tool that can shape narratives and influence public perception across various domains. By recognizing its presence and implications, individuals can better navigate the information landscape and make informed decisions. It is imperative to promote transparency and encourage critical engagement with information to mitigate the effects of selective release and foster a more informed society.

在当今快节奏的世界中，信息既丰富又易于获取。然而，并非所有信息都是平等的，其传播方式会显著影响公众的认知和理解。一个在政治、媒体和科学等多个领域逐渐受到关注的概念是选择性发布。这个术语指的是发布特定信息片段而隐瞒其他信息的做法，通常是为了塑造叙述或影响舆论。理解选择性发布对于应对我们社会中信息的复杂性至关重要。在政治传播中，选择性发布现象屡见不鲜，领导者可能选择只披露有利的统计数据或结果，而忽略不利的数据。例如，在选举活动中，候选人可能会强调自己在创造就业方面的成就，但未提及某些群体中失业率上升。这种策略可以造成现实的扭曲，使选民在不完整的信息基础上做出决策。同样，在媒体环境中，新闻机构常常通过选择报道哪些故事以及如何框架这些故事来参与选择性发布。这可能导致事件的偏见描绘，因为某些角度可能被强调，而其他角度则被淡化或忽视。例如，抗议活动的报道可能集中在暴力事件上，而不是传达的和平信息，从而以特定方向塑造公众舆论。在科学研究领域，选择性发布可能发生在研究人员只发表积极结果而压制负面发现时。这种做法被称为出版偏倚，可能扭曲科学文献并导致对某一领域的不准确理解。例如，制药公司可能只发布显示新药有效性的研究，而忽略分享显示不良反应或在某些人群中缺乏效果的数据。这种做法对公共健康和安全可能产生严重影响，因为它们妨碍了医疗专业人员和患者做出明智决定的能力。选择性发布的影响超越个案，它们可以影响社会规范和价值观。当人们持续接触到经过策划的信息时，他们可能会形成扭曲的现实观。这可能导致极化，因为个人变得固执己见，拒绝对立观点。此外，选择性发布可能侵蚀对机构的信任，因为人们可能会感到被掌控信息流的权力者操纵或欺骗。为了抵消选择性发布的影响，个人必须培养批判性思维技能，并寻求多样化的信息来源。接触多种观点可以帮助更全面地了解复杂问题。此外，无论是在政治、媒体还是研究中，沟通透明度对促进信任和问责至关重要。通过倡导开放对话和共享所有相关信息，社会可以朝着更加知情和参与的公民社会迈进。总之，选择性发布是一种强大的工具，可以在各个领域塑造叙述和影响公众认知。通过认识到其存在和影响，个人可以更好地应对信息环境并做出明智的决策。促进透明度和鼓励对信息的批判性参与是缓解选择性发布影响、促进更知情社会的必要条件。