right of angary

简明释义

征用权非常征用权

英英释义

例句

1.Under international law, the right of angary must be exercised in accordance with established protocols.

根据国际法，对敌方财产的强制权的行使必须遵循既定程序。

2.The government invoked the right of angary during the conflict to take control of foreign-owned assets.

政府在冲突期间援引了对敌方财产的强制权，以控制外资资产。

3.Historically, the right of angary allowed belligerents to commandeer vessels for military purposes.

历史上，对敌方财产的强制权允许交战国征用船只用于军事目的。

4.The merchant ship was subject to the right of angary when it entered the war zone.

当商船进入战区时，受到对敌方财产的强制权的约束。

5.In times of war, a nation may exercise the right of angary to seize enemy ships in its ports.

在战争时期，一个国家可以行使对敌方财产的强制权，以扣押其港口中的敌方船只。

作文

In the realm of international law and maritime practices, the term right of angary holds significant importance. This legal doctrine allows a state to seize foreign vessels and cargo in times of war or national emergency. The concept originates from the necessity for nations to protect their interests during conflicts, allowing them to commandeer resources that could be vital for their survival. The right of angary is not only about the physical act of seizing ships but also embodies the principles of sovereignty and self-defense. Historically, the right of angary has been invoked by various nations to justify actions taken against foreign entities. For instance, during World War II, many countries exercised this right to secure vessels that could aid their military efforts. The rationale behind this practice is rooted in the idea that a nation must be able to act decisively to protect its citizens and maintain its security. Therefore, when a country is faced with a threat, it may resort to the right of angary as a means of ensuring its survival.However, the application of the right of angary raises questions regarding legality and morality. Critics argue that such actions can lead to abuses of power, where states might exploit this right to unjustly seize property from foreign nationals. This concern highlights the need for clear regulations and guidelines governing the use of the right of angary. International treaties and agreements have attempted to address these issues, aiming to balance the rights of states with the protection of individual property rights.Moreover, the right of angary is closely linked to the principles of necessity and proportionality in international law. A state must demonstrate that the seizure of a vessel is essential for its defense and that the action taken is proportionate to the threat faced. This legal framework is crucial in preventing arbitrary seizures and ensuring that the right of angary is not misused.As global politics continue to evolve, the relevance of the right of angary remains a topic of debate among scholars and policymakers. In an era of increasing globalization, the implications of such a right can have far-reaching consequences. The interconnectedness of economies means that the seizure of vessels can disrupt trade routes and impact international relations. Thus, while the right of angary serves as a tool for national defense, it also necessitates careful consideration of its broader implications on global stability.In conclusion, the right of angary represents a complex intersection of law, ethics, and international relations. It underscores the delicate balance that nations must strike between safeguarding their interests and adhering to international norms. As we navigate the challenges of the modern world, understanding the nuances of the right of angary will be essential for fostering cooperation and maintaining peace among nations.

在国际法和海事实践领域，术语权利的愤怒具有重要意义。这一法律原则允许国家在战争或国家紧急情况下扣押外国船只和货物。这个概念源于国家在冲突期间保护自身利益的必要性，使其能够征用可能对生存至关重要的资源。权利的愤怒不仅仅是关于扣押船只的实际行为，还体现了主权和自卫的原则。历史上，各国曾多次引用权利的愤怒来为针对外国实体的行动辩护。例如，在第二次世界大战期间，许多国家行使这一权利，以确保能够支持其军事努力的船只。此做法背后的理由根植于一个思想，即国家必须能够果断行动以保护公民并维护安全。因此，当一个国家面临威胁时，它可能会诉诸于权利的愤怒，以确保其生存。然而，权利的愤怒的应用引发了关于合法性和道德性的质疑。批评者认为，这种行为可能导致权力的滥用，国家可能利用这一权利不公正地扣押外籍国民的财产。这一担忧突显了对明确规定和指导方针的需求，以规范权利的愤怒的使用。国际条约和协议试图解决这些问题，旨在平衡国家的权利与保护个人财产权利之间的关系。此外，权利的愤怒与国际法中的必要性和相称性原则密切相关。国家必须证明扣押船只对于其防御是必要的，并且采取的行动与面临的威胁是成比例的。这一法律框架对于防止任意扣押和确保权利的愤怒不被滥用至关重要。随着全球政治的不断演变，权利的愤怒的相关性仍然是学者和政策制定者讨论的话题。在全球化日益加深的时代，这种权利的影响可能会产生深远的后果。经济的相互联系意味着船只的扣押可能会扰乱贸易路线并影响国际关系。因此，尽管权利的愤怒作为国家防御的工具，但它也需要仔细考虑对全球稳定的更广泛影响。总之，权利的愤怒代表了法律、伦理和国际关系之间复杂的交汇点。它强调了国家在保护自身利益与遵守国际规范之间必须达到的微妙平衡。随着我们应对现代世界的挑战，理解权利的愤怒的细微差别将对促进合作和维护国家之间的和平至关重要。