retroactive audion

简明释义

再生检波管

英英释义

例句

1.The audit committee recommended a retroactive audion 追溯性审计 to address concerns raised by stakeholders.

审计委员会建议进行追溯性审计，以解决利益相关者提出的担忧。

2.For compliance reasons, we need to perform a retroactive audion 追溯性审计 on our past transactions.

出于合规原因，我们需要对过去的交易进行追溯性审计。

3.The company issued a bonus with a retroactive audion 追溯性审计 to ensure all employees received their fair share.

公司发放了一笔奖金，进行了追溯性审计，以确保所有员工都能获得他们应得的份额。

4.During the financial review, the accountant discovered discrepancies that required a retroactive audion 追溯性审计 of previous years' records.

在财务审查期间，会计发现了不一致之处，需要对前几年的记录进行追溯性审计。

5.The government announced a retroactive audion 追溯性审计 of tax returns to identify any fraudulent claims.

政府宣布对税务申报进行追溯性审计，以识别任何欺诈性索赔。

作文

In recent years, the concept of retroactive audion has gained attention in various fields, particularly in law and media. The term refers to the practice of applying a new rule or regulation to events that occurred before the rule was enacted. This can lead to significant implications for individuals and organizations alike. Understanding the nuances of retroactive audion is essential for navigating its complexities and ensuring compliance with legal standards.One of the most notable examples of retroactive audion can be found in the realm of copyright law. In many jurisdictions, new copyright laws are often established to adapt to changing technologies and societal norms. When these laws are applied retroactively, they can affect works that were created prior to the law's enactment. This raises questions about fairness and the rights of creators. For instance, if a new copyright law extends the duration of protection for a particular type of work, artists who previously believed their works were in the public domain may suddenly find themselves facing legal challenges.The implications of retroactive audion extend beyond copyright law into the realm of financial regulations as well. Consider a scenario where a government introduces new tax laws designed to close loopholes. If these laws are applied retroactively, businesses could be held liable for taxes on income they earned under the previous regulations. This can create a sense of uncertainty and instability within the business community, as companies must grapple with unexpected liabilities and potential penalties.Moreover, retroactive audion can also intersect with criminal law. In some cases, new laws may redefine what constitutes a crime, leading to the possibility of prosecuting individuals for actions that were legal at the time they were committed. This raises ethical concerns about justice and the principle of legality, which states that no one should be punished under a law that did not exist at the time of their actions. Legal systems around the world grapple with these issues, striving to balance the need for updated laws with the protection of individual rights.The debate surrounding retroactive audion is not limited to legal frameworks; it also extends to social and political discourse. Advocates for retroactive measures argue that they are necessary for correcting past injustices and adapting to new realities. For example, laws aimed at addressing historical discrimination may require retroactive application to ensure that affected individuals receive justice. Conversely, opponents argue that such measures can undermine the stability of legal systems and erode trust in governance.In conclusion, retroactive audion is a multifaceted concept that touches upon various aspects of law, ethics, and social justice. As society continues to evolve, the need for laws to adapt will only grow. However, the implications of applying these laws retroactively must be carefully considered to avoid unintended consequences. Understanding the dynamics of retroactive audion is crucial for legal professionals, policymakers, and citizens alike, as it shapes the landscape of our legal and social systems. Ultimately, striking a balance between progress and fairness will be key to navigating the complexities of this important issue.

近年来，追溯性审计的概念在法律和媒体等多个领域引起了关注。该术语指的是将新规则或法规应用于在规则制定之前发生的事件。这可能对个人和组织产生重大影响。理解追溯性审计的细微差别对于驾驭其复杂性并确保遵守法律标准至关重要。一个最显著的追溯性审计例子可以在版权法领域找到。在许多法域中，新的版权法通常会建立以适应技术和社会规范的变化。当这些法律被追溯适用时，它们可能会影响在法律实施之前创作的作品。这引发了关于公平性和创作者权利的问题。例如，如果一项新的版权法延长了特定类型作品的保护期限，艺术家们曾认为他们的作品已进入公共领域，可能会突然面临法律挑战。追溯性审计的影响不仅限于版权法，还扩展到金融监管领域。考虑一个场景，一个政府推出新的税法，旨在关闭漏洞。如果这些法律被追溯适用，企业可能会因在先前法规下获得的收入而承担税务责任。这可能在商业社区内造成不确定性和不稳定感，因为公司必须应对意外的负债和潜在的处罚。此外，追溯性审计还可能与刑法交叉。在某些情况下，新法律可能重新定义什么构成犯罪，从而导致对在其行为合法时进行的行为的起诉。这引发了有关正义和合法性原则的伦理问题，该原则规定，任何人都不应在其行为时不存在的法律下受到惩罚。世界各地的法律体系都在努力应对这些问题，力求在更新法律的需要与保护个人权利之间取得平衡。围绕追溯性审计的辩论不仅限于法律框架；它还扩展到社会和政治话语。支持追溯性措施的人认为，这些措施对于纠正过去的不公和适应新现实是必要的。例如，旨在解决历史歧视的法律可能需要追溯适用，以确保受影响的个人获得公正。相反，反对者认为，此类措施可能会破坏法律体系的稳定性，并侵蚀对治理的信任。总之，追溯性审计是一个多方面的概念，涉及法律、伦理和社会正义的各个方面。随着社会的持续发展，对法律适应的需求只会增加。然而，追溯适用这些法律的影响必须经过仔细考虑，以避免意想不到的后果。理解追溯性审计的动态对于法律专业人士、政策制定者和公民来说至关重要，因为它塑造了我们法律和社会体系的格局。最终，在进步与公平之间取得平衡将是驾驭这一重要问题复杂性的关键。