privatisation

简明释义

英[ˌprɪvaɪtəˈzeɪʃən]美[ˌpraɪvəˈzeɪʃən]

n. 私有化；民营化；私营化

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So did the then Czechoslovakia, which plumped for mass privatisation, albeit not very successfully.

当时的捷克斯洛伐克也是如此，尽管不甚成功，但仍坚持大规模私有化。

2.All this could change if the privatisation scheme succeeds.

如果私有化方案能够成功，那么这一切将会改变。

3.But critics say that the scheme amounts to privatisation of natural resources.

但是批评者说这个计划会导致自然资源的私有化。

4.Privatisation is the best way to ensure that the public does not, instead, end up serving the post office.

私有化是确保邮局服务大众，而不是大众服务邮局的最好方式。

5.Mr Ryan refuses to call this a voucher plan, let alone a form of privatisation.

Ryan先生拒绝称之为传票制度，更不会承认这是一种私有化形式。

6.For the departing generals, privatisation looks to be a retirement plan of sorts.

对于那些即将离任的将军们来说，私有化可以说是一个退休计划。

7.A bungled privatisation has messed up commercial farming.

糟糕的私有化使商业农场(commercial farming)陷入困境。

8.The government announced a plan for the privatisation 私有化 of state-owned enterprises to improve efficiency.

政府宣布了一项计划，旨在提高效率，对国有企业进行私有化。

9.The privatisation 私有化 of the telecommunications sector has resulted in increased competition.

电信行业的私有化导致了竞争的加剧。

10.Supporters argue that privatisation 私有化 can lead to better management and innovation.

支持者认为，私有化可以带来更好的管理和创新。

11.The privatisation 私有化 of the water supply has sparked a heated debate in the community.

供水系统的私有化在社区引发了激烈的辩论。

12.Many citizens are concerned about the privatisation 私有化 of public services, fearing it may lead to higher costs.

许多市民对公共服务的私有化感到担忧，担心这可能导致成本上升。

作文

Privatisation, or 私有化, is a process that has gained significant attention in recent decades. It refers to the transfer of ownership of a business, enterprise, or public service from the government to private individuals or organizations. The rationale behind 私有化 is often rooted in the belief that the private sector can operate more efficiently than the public sector. Proponents argue that 私有化 leads to improved services, increased competition, and ultimately, better outcomes for consumers. However, this process is not without its controversies and challenges.One of the primary arguments in favor of 私有化 is the idea that it can enhance efficiency. Government-run enterprises are sometimes criticized for being bureaucratic and slow to adapt to changing market conditions. When a service is 私有化, it is believed that the new owners will have a greater incentive to innovate and cut costs in order to maximize profits. For example, the 私有化 of telecommunications in many countries has led to significant advancements in technology and service delivery.Moreover, 私有化 can stimulate competition. In a competitive market, companies strive to attract customers by offering better prices and services. This competition can lead to lower costs and improved quality for consumers. A notable example is the 私有化 of the energy sector in various nations, which has resulted in a wider range of options for consumers and more competitive pricing.However, the 私有化 process can also raise concerns about equity and access. When essential services such as healthcare, education, or water supply are 私有化, there is a risk that profit motives may overshadow public welfare. Critics argue that 私有化 can lead to increased prices and reduced access for low-income individuals. In some cases, companies may prioritize profit over service quality, leading to neglect of less profitable areas or demographics.Furthermore, 私有化 can result in job losses and labor disputes. As private companies seek to reduce costs, they may downsize their workforce or implement changes that are not favorable to employees. This can lead to social unrest and opposition from labor unions, which advocate for workers' rights and job security.In addition to these challenges, the implementation of 私有化 often requires careful planning and regulation. Governments must ensure that the transition to private ownership does not compromise the quality of services or the rights of consumers and workers. Effective regulatory frameworks are essential to monitor the performance of privatized entities and to safeguard public interests.In conclusion, 私有化 is a complex and multifaceted process that has both advantages and disadvantages. While it can lead to increased efficiency and competition, it also poses risks related to equity, access, and job security. Policymakers must weigh these factors carefully when considering 私有化 initiatives. Ultimately, the goal should be to balance the benefits of private ownership with the need to protect public welfare and ensure that essential services remain accessible to all members of society.

私有化是近年来备受关注的一个过程。它指的是将企业、事业或公共服务的所有权从政府转移到个人或私人组织。支持私有化的理由通常源于相信私营部门能够比公共部门更高效地运作。支持者认为，私有化可以改善服务、增加竞争，最终为消费者带来更好的结果。然而，这一过程并非没有争议和挑战。支持私有化的主要论点之一是它可以提高效率。政府运营的企业有时被批评为官僚主义，难以适应变化的市场条件。当服务被私有化时，人们相信新所有者会有更大的动力去创新和降低成本，以最大化利润。例如，许多国家的电信私有化导致了技术和服务交付的显著进步。此外，私有化可以刺激竞争。在竞争激烈的市场中，公司努力通过提供更好的价格和服务来吸引客户。这种竞争可以为消费者带来更低的成本和更好的质量。一个显著的例子是各国能源部门的私有化，结果为消费者提供了更多选择和更具竞争力的定价。然而，私有化过程也可能引发关于公平和可及性的担忧。当像医疗保健、教育或水供应等基本服务被私有化时，存在利润动机可能掩盖公共福利的风险。批评者认为，私有化可能导致价格上涨和低收入个体的可及性降低。在某些情况下，公司可能优先考虑利润，而忽视服务质量，导致对不那么盈利的地区或人群的忽视。此外，私有化还可能导致失业和劳资纠纷。私营公司在寻求降低成本时，可能会缩减员工人数或实施不利于员工的变更。这可能导致社会动荡和工会的反对，工会倡导工人的权益和工作保障。除了这些挑战之外，实施私有化通常需要仔细的规划和监管。政府必须确保向私人所有权的过渡不会影响服务质量或消费者和工人的权利。有效的监管框架对于监测私有化实体的表现以及保护公共利益至关重要。总之，私有化是一个复杂而多面的过程，既有优势也有劣势。虽然它可以提高效率和竞争，但也带来了与公平、可及性和就业保障相关的风险。政策制定者在考虑私有化倡议时必须仔细权衡这些因素。最终，目标应是在保护公共福利的同时，平衡私有所有权的好处，确保所有社会成员都能获得基本服务。