militias

简明释义

英[mɪˈlɪʃəz]美[mɪˈlɪʃəz]

n. 民兵；国民军；义勇军（militia 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Some unemployed miners had been expected to join militias, though evidence that they have done so is scant.

一些失业的矿主打算投奔民兵，即使很少证据显示他们已经这样做。

2.So Libyans may see more violent spats between militias and unilateral moves over high-value prisoners.

因此，利比亚人或将会看到民兵之间不断发生暴烈争斗，以及更多的针对重要羁押犯的单边行动。

3.Officials claim that the militias total 125,000, and that the goal is to reach 2m.

官方称自卫队总人数已经达到12.5万人，其目标是达到200万人。

4.They can continue to train Iraq's own security forces and, if necessary, attack or dismantle some of the militias.

还可以继续训练伊拉克自己的武装力量，如有必要，还能解散一些民兵组织。

5.And plans remarkably similar to the old British idea were put in place for local defence militias.

当地的防卫军执行了这个和陈旧的英国想法非常相似的计划。

6.The militias are said to use the weapons sparingly, mainly in response to attacks on Shia targets.

民兵声称使用武器非常节省，主要针对袭击什叶目标的报复。

7.Some militias 民兵组织 have been accused of human rights violations.

一些民兵组织被指控侵犯人权。

8.The rise of militias 民兵组织 has led to increased violence in the area.

民兵组织的崛起导致该地区暴力事件增加。

9.Local militias 民兵组织 often fill the security gap left by the national army.

地方民兵组织通常填补国家军队留下的安全空白。

10.The government is struggling to control the various militias 民兵组织 operating in the region.

政府在努力控制该地区运作的各种民兵组织。

11.During the conflict, many militias 民兵组织 formed to protect their communities.

在冲突期间，许多民兵组织成立以保护他们的社区。

作文

In recent years, the term militias has gained significant attention in global news and political discussions. A militia is typically defined as a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency. This concept can be traced back to ancient times, where communities would band together to defend their territories against invaders. However, the modern interpretation of militias often varies widely depending on the context in which it is used.One of the most prominent examples of militias in contemporary society can be seen in conflict zones around the world. In countries like Syria and Iraq, various militias have emerged as powerful groups that challenge both governmental authority and foreign intervention. These armed factions often operate outside the law and can be driven by ideological motives, such as religious extremism or nationalism. For instance, groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq have been classified as militias due to their role in regional conflicts and their ability to mobilize local populations.Moreover, in the United States, the term militia has taken on a different connotation. Here, it often refers to groups of civilians who organize themselves for self-defense or to advocate for certain political ideologies, particularly those related to gun rights and anti-government sentiments. Some of these groups, such as the Oath Keepers or the Three Percenters, identify themselves as militias and claim to uphold the Constitution. However, their activities have sparked controversies, especially when they engage in armed protests or confrontations with law enforcement.The rise of militias in various contexts raises important questions about the balance between security and civil liberties. On one hand, proponents argue that militias serve as a necessary check on government power, providing citizens with the means to protect themselves and their communities. On the other hand, critics warn that unchecked militias can lead to violence, undermine the rule of law, and create divisions within society.Additionally, the involvement of militias in political movements can further complicate the landscape. In many cases, these groups leverage social media and other platforms to recruit members and spread their ideologies. This digital presence allows them to gain traction among disillusioned individuals who feel marginalized by mainstream politics. As a result, militias can influence public opinion and even affect elections, raising concerns about the integrity of democratic processes.In conclusion, the concept of militias encompasses a wide range of meanings and implications across different societies. Whether viewed as defenders of freedom or as threats to stability, militias play a complex role in the modern world. Understanding their motivations, structures, and impacts is crucial for policymakers, scholars, and citizens alike. As we navigate an increasingly polarized environment, the discourse surrounding militias will likely continue to evolve, reflecting broader societal tensions and the ongoing struggle for power and identity.

近年来，‘militias’这个词在全球新闻和政治讨论中引起了显著关注。‘militia’通常被定义为从民众中招募的军事力量，以在紧急情况下补充常规军队。这个概念可以追溯到古代，当时社区会团结起来捍卫他们的领土免受入侵者的攻击。然而，现代对‘militias’的解释往往因其使用的背景而大相径庭。当今社会中‘militias’最突出的例子可以在全球冲突地区看到。在叙利亚和伊拉克等国，各种‘militias’作为强大的武装团体出现，挑战政府权威和外国干预。这些武装派系往往在法律之外运作，可能受到意识形态动机的驱动，如宗教极端主义或民族主义。例如，黎巴嫩的真主党和伊拉克的人民动员力量就被归类为‘militias’，因为它们在地区冲突中的作用以及动员当地民众的能力。此外，在美国，‘militia’一词则有了不同的含义。在这里，它通常指的是组织起来进行自我防卫或倡导某些政治意识形态（特别是与持枪权和反政府情绪相关）的平民团体。这些团体中的一些，例如誓言守护者或三百分之一者，自称为‘militias’，并声称维护宪法。然而，当他们参与武装抗议或与执法部门对峙时，他们的活动引发了争议。‘militias’的兴起引发了关于安全与公民自由之间平衡的重要问题。一方面，支持者认为‘militias’是对政府权力必要的制衡，为公民提供保护自己和社区的手段。另一方面，批评者警告称，不受控制的‘militias’可能导致暴力，破坏法治，并在社会内部造成分裂。此外，‘militias’参与政治运动可能进一步复杂化局势。在许多情况下，这些团体利用社交媒体和其他平台招募成员并传播他们的意识形态。这种数字存在使他们能够在感到被主流政治边缘化的失望个体中获得支持。因此，‘militias’可能影响公众舆论，甚至影响选举，引发对民主过程完整性的担忧。总之，‘militias’的概念涵盖了不同社会中广泛的含义和影响。无论被视为自由的捍卫者还是稳定的威胁，‘militias’在现代世界中扮演着复杂的角色。理解它们的动机、结构和影响对于政策制定者、学者和公民而言至关重要。在我们应对日益两极化的环境时，围绕‘militias’的讨论很可能会继续演变，反映更广泛的社会紧张关系以及对权力和身份的持续斗争。