qualitative governing

简明释义

变质调节

英英释义

例句

1.The committee focused on qualitative governing to enhance community engagement.

委员会专注于定性治理以增强社区参与。

2.Effective qualitative governing can lead to more sustainable outcomes.

有效的定性治理可以带来更可持续的结果。

3.The organization adopted qualitative governing principles to improve transparency.

该组织采纳了定性治理原则以提高透明度。

4.The research highlighted the importance of qualitative governing in policymaking.

研究强调了定性治理在政策制定中的重要性。

5.In our project, we emphasized qualitative governing to ensure that all voices were heard.

在我们的项目中，我们强调定性治理以确保所有声音都被听到。

作文

In today's rapidly changing world, the concept of governance has evolved significantly. Traditional methods of governance often focus on quantitative metrics such as economic growth rates, employment statistics, and GDP figures. However, there is a growing recognition of the importance of more nuanced approaches that prioritize human experiences and social well-being. This shift in perspective is encapsulated in the term qualitative governing, which emphasizes the significance of qualitative factors in the decision-making process. Qualitative governing refers to governance that prioritizes the quality of life, community engagement, and the overall well-being of individuals rather than merely focusing on numerical data.One of the key aspects of qualitative governing is its emphasis on understanding the needs and aspirations of citizens. In many cases, policies that are based solely on quantitative data can overlook the complexities of human experiences. For instance, a government may decide to allocate funds to improve infrastructure based on statistical analyses showing high traffic congestion. While this may seem like a logical decision, it fails to consider the underlying issues that contribute to that congestion, such as inadequate public transportation options or the need for more pedestrian-friendly spaces. By adopting a qualitative governing approach, policymakers can engage with communities to gain insights into their specific challenges and preferences, ultimately leading to more effective and sustainable solutions.Furthermore, qualitative governing encourages a participatory approach to governance. When citizens are involved in the decision-making process, they feel a greater sense of ownership over the outcomes. This involvement can take various forms, such as public consultations, community forums, and collaborative policymaking initiatives. By fostering an environment where citizens can voice their opinions and contribute to discussions, governments can create policies that are more reflective of the diverse needs of their populations. This participatory aspect not only enhances the legitimacy of governance but also builds trust between citizens and their leaders.Another important dimension of qualitative governing is its focus on long-term sustainability. In contrast to short-term quantitative goals, which may prioritize immediate results, qualitative governance encourages a broader vision that considers the future implications of decisions. For example, when addressing environmental issues, a qualitative governing approach would involve not only assessing current pollution levels but also understanding the potential impact on future generations. This holistic perspective allows for the development of policies that promote environmental stewardship and social equity, ensuring that resources are managed responsibly for the benefit of all.In conclusion, the notion of qualitative governing represents a significant shift in how we think about governance. By prioritizing qualitative factors such as community engagement, citizen participation, and long-term sustainability, governments can create more effective and inclusive policies. As we navigate the complexities of modern society, embracing qualitative governing will be essential for fostering resilient communities and improving the overall quality of life for all citizens.

在当今快速变化的世界中，治理的概念发生了显著的演变。传统的治理方法通常侧重于定量指标，例如经济增长率、就业统计和国内生产总值（GDP）数据。然而，人们越来越认识到更加细致的方法的重要性，这些方法优先考虑人类的体验和社会福祉。这种视角的转变体现在短语qualitative governing中，它强调在决策过程中定性因素的重要性。Qualitative governing指的是优先考虑生活质量、社区参与和个人整体福祉的治理，而不仅仅是关注数字数据。Qualitative governing的一个关键方面是强调理解公民的需求和愿望。在许多情况下，仅基于定量数据的政策可能会忽视人类经验的复杂性。例如，政府可能会根据统计分析决定拨款改善基础设施，因为数据显示交通拥堵严重。虽然这似乎是一个合乎逻辑的决定，但它未能考虑导致拥堵的潜在问题，例如公共交通选项不足或需要更多适合行人的空间。通过采用qualitative governing的方法，政策制定者可以与社区互动，以获得他们特定挑战和偏好的见解，最终导致更有效和可持续的解决方案。此外，qualitative governing鼓励一种参与式的治理方式。当公民参与决策过程时，他们会对结果产生更强的归属感。这种参与可以采取多种形式，例如公众咨询、社区论坛和协作政策制定倡议。通过营造一个公民可以表达意见和参与讨论的环境，政府可以制定更能反映其人口多样化需求的政策。这种参与的方面不仅增强了治理的合法性，还建立了公民与领导者之间的信任。Qualitative governing的另一个重要维度是其对长期可持续性的关注。与可能优先考虑即时结果的短期定量目标相比，定性治理鼓励考虑决策的未来影响。例如，在应对环境问题时，qualitative governing的方法不仅涉及评估当前的污染水平，还要理解对未来几代人的潜在影响。这种整体视角使得能够制定促进环境保护和社会公平的政策，确保资源得到负责任的管理，以造福所有人。总之，qualitative governing的概念代表了我们对治理思考的重大转变。通过优先考虑社区参与、公民参与和长期可持续性等定性因素，政府能够创建更有效和包容的政策。在我们应对现代社会的复杂性时，接受qualitative governing将对促进韧性社区和改善所有公民的整体生活质量至关重要。