proof of harm

简明释义

危害证实

英英释义

例句

1.Without proof of harm 伤害证据, the insurance claim was denied.

没有proof of harm 伤害证据，保险索赔被拒绝。

2.The researcher published a paper detailing proof of harm 伤害证据 from the new drug.

研究人员发表了一篇论文，详细说明了新药的proof of harm 伤害证据。

3.The environmental group gathered proof of harm 伤害证据 caused by the factory's emissions.

环保组织收集了工厂排放造成的proof of harm 伤害证据。

4.Activists are seeking proof of harm 伤害证据 to support their claims against the pesticide.

活动人士正在寻找proof of harm 伤害证据以支持他们对农药的指控。

5.In a court case, the plaintiff must provide proof of harm 伤害证据 to win compensation for damages.

在法庭案件中，原告必须提供proof of harm 伤害证据才能赢得赔偿。

作文

In today's world, the concept of proof of harm has become increasingly significant, particularly in discussions surrounding environmental issues, public health, and legal matters. The term refers to the evidence that demonstrates the negative impact of an action or policy on individuals, communities, or ecosystems. Understanding this concept is essential for advocating change and ensuring accountability in various fields.To illustrate, consider the ongoing debates about climate change. Scientists have long warned about the detrimental effects of greenhouse gas emissions on our planet. However, the challenge lies in providing proof of harm that connects these emissions to specific adverse outcomes, such as rising sea levels or increased frequency of natural disasters. Without clear evidence, it becomes difficult to mobilize public opinion or implement effective policies aimed at reducing carbon footprints.In public health, the need for proof of harm is equally critical. For instance, when new pharmaceuticals are introduced into the market, regulatory bodies require extensive testing to establish safety and efficacy. This process often involves presenting proof of harm that demonstrates any potential side effects or risks associated with the drug. Only through rigorous scientific research can we ensure that medications do more good than harm, protecting patients from unforeseen consequences.Legal contexts also highlight the importance of proof of harm. In court cases, plaintiffs must provide evidence that demonstrates how they have been harmed by the defendant's actions. This requirement serves to ensure that justice is served based on factual information rather than mere allegations. For example, in cases of environmental pollution, affected individuals or communities must present proof of harm linking their health issues or property damage directly to the pollution caused by a corporation. This can involve expert testimonies, medical records, and environmental studies.Moreover, the digital age has brought new challenges in gathering proof of harm. With the rise of social media and online platforms, misinformation can spread rapidly, complicating efforts to identify genuine harm. Activists and researchers must navigate a landscape filled with conflicting information while striving to present accurate data that reflects real-world impacts. This underscores the necessity for critical thinking and media literacy skills in discerning credible sources from misleading narratives.In conclusion, the concept of proof of harm is vital across various sectors, including environmental science, public health, and law. It serves as the foundation for advocacy, ensuring that decisions are made based on evidence and facts rather than assumptions. As we continue to face complex global challenges, the ability to effectively gather and present proof of harm will be crucial in driving meaningful change and holding accountable those who contribute to societal and environmental degradation.

在当今世界，proof of harm（伤害证明）这一概念变得越来越重要，特别是在环境问题、公共健康和法律事务的讨论中。该术语指的是证明某一行动或政策对个人、社区或生态系统产生负面影响的证据。理解这一概念对于倡导变革和确保各领域的问责制至关重要。例如，考虑到气候变化的持续辩论。科学家们早已警告温室气体排放对我们星球的有害影响。然而，挑战在于提供<证明伤害，将这些排放与特定的不利后果联系起来，例如海平面上升或自然灾害频率增加。如果没有明确的证据，就很难动员公众舆论或实施有效的政策来减少碳足迹。在公共健康领域，proof of harm（伤害证明）的需求同样至关重要。例如，当新的药物被引入市场时，监管机构要求进行广泛的测试以建立安全性和有效性。这一过程通常涉及提供proof of harm，以证明与药物相关的任何潜在副作用或风险。只有通过严谨的科学研究，我们才能确保药物的好处大于危害，从而保护患者免受意想不到的后果。法律背景也突显了proof of harm（伤害证明）的重要性。在法庭案件中，原告必须提供证据，证明他们因被告的行为而受到伤害。这一要求确保正义是基于事实信息，而非单纯的指控。例如，在环境污染案件中，受影响的个人或社区必须提供proof of harm，将他们的健康问题或财产损失直接与公司造成的污染联系起来。这可能涉及专家证词、医疗记录和环境研究。此外，数字时代在收集proof of harm（伤害证明）方面带来了新的挑战。随着社交媒体和在线平台的崛起，错误信息可以迅速传播，复杂化了识别真实伤害的努力。活动家和研究人员必须在充满矛盾信息的环境中导航，同时努力呈现反映现实影响的准确数据。这突显了批判性思维和媒体素养技能在辨别可信来源与误导性叙述中的必要性。总之，proof of harm（伤害证明）这一概念在环境科学、公共健康和法律等各个领域都是至关重要的。它作为倡导的基础，确保决策是基于证据和事实，而非假设。随着我们继续面临复杂的全球挑战，有效收集和呈现proof of harm（伤害证明）的能力将对推动有意义的变革和追究那些导致社会和环境退化的责任至关重要。