permissible revolution

简明释义

容许转数

英英释义

例句

1.Activists argue that their actions are part of a permissible revolution 允许的革命 aimed at social justice.

活动人士辩称，他们的行动是为了社会正义而进行的允许的革命的一部分。

2.The concept of a permissible revolution 允许的革命 is often debated among political theorists.

关于允许的革命的概念常常在政治理论家中引发辩论。

3.In a democratic society, a permissible revolution 允许的革命 can occur when the government fails to represent the will of the people.

在一个民主社会中，当政府未能代表人民意愿时，可以发生一场允许的革命。

4.A permissible revolution 允许的革命 can be seen as a last resort when all other means of change have failed.

当其他所有变革手段都失败时，允许的革命可以被视为最后的手段。

5.Historically, many movements have been labeled as a permissible revolution 允许的革命 by those in power to justify their suppression.

历史上，许多运动被当权者标记为允许的革命以为镇压行为辩护。

作文

The concept of a permissible revolution is a fascinating topic that engages both political theorists and everyday citizens. At its core, a permissible revolution refers to a form of societal change or upheaval that is accepted or justified within the framework of moral, ethical, or legal standards. This notion raises several questions about the legitimacy of revolutions in various contexts, particularly in situations where oppression or injustice prevails.To understand what constitutes a permissible revolution, we must first examine the circumstances under which revolutions typically arise. History has shown us that revolutions often emerge in response to systemic injustices, such as authoritarian rule, economic disparity, or social inequality. For example, the American Revolution can be seen as a permissible revolution because it was driven by the desire for independence and self-governance against British tyranny. The colonists believed that their rights were being violated, and thus they sought to overthrow an oppressive regime.In contrast, not all revolutions are viewed as permissible. The French Revolution, while initially aimed at ending feudalism and establishing equality, devolved into violence and chaos, leading to the Reign of Terror. This raises the question: at what point does a revolution lose its permissibility? When the means employed to achieve change result in widespread suffering and loss of life, the moral justification for the revolution can be called into question. Thus, the ethical implications of revolutionary actions must be considered when determining whether a revolution is indeed permissible.Moreover, the role of public support and participation is crucial in defining a permissible revolution. A revolution that is backed by a significant portion of the population is more likely to be deemed legitimate. For instance, the Civil Rights Movement in the United States can be viewed as a permissible revolution because it sought to dismantle institutional racism through nonviolent protests and legal challenges. The movement garnered widespread support and ultimately led to significant legislative changes, illustrating how a revolution can be both ethical and effective.However, the concept of a permissible revolution is not static; it evolves with societal values and norms. In today’s globalized world, the criteria for what is considered permissible may differ from one culture or nation to another. For instance, movements advocating for democracy in authoritarian regimes may be seen as permissible revolutions in some contexts but could be met with resistance and condemnation in others. This highlights the importance of understanding the cultural and historical context when evaluating the legitimacy of revolutionary actions.In conclusion, the idea of a permissible revolution is complex and multifaceted. It encompasses ethical considerations, public support, and the historical context of societal change. As we reflect on past revolutions and the ongoing struggles for justice and equality around the world, it is essential to critically assess the conditions under which revolutions are deemed permissible. Ultimately, a permissible revolution should aim to create a more just and equitable society, free from oppression and injustice, while considering the moral implications of the means used to achieve such transformation.

“允许的革命”这一概念是一个引人入胜的话题，吸引着政治理论家和普通公民。在其核心，允许的革命指的是在道德、伦理或法律标准框架内被接受或证明合理的社会变革或动荡。这一概念引发了关于在各种背景下革命合法性的问题，特别是在压迫或不公正存在的情况下。要理解什么构成“允许的革命”，我们首先必须审视革命通常出现的环境。历史告诉我们，革命往往是对系统性不公正的反应，例如专制统治、经济差距或社会不平等。例如，美国革命可以被视为一次允许的革命，因为它是为了摆脱英国暴政而追求独立和自我治理。殖民者认为他们的权利受到了侵犯，因此他们寻求推翻一个压迫性的政权。相反，并非所有革命都被视为允许的。法国革命虽然最初旨在结束封建制度并建立平等，但却演变为暴力和混乱，导致恐怖统治。这引发了一个问题：革命何时失去了其允许性？当实现变革的手段导致广泛的痛苦和生命损失时，革命的道德正当性可能受到质疑。因此，在确定一场革命是否确实允许时，必须考虑革命行动的伦理影响。此外，公众支持和参与的角色在定义“允许的革命”中至关重要。得到大量民众支持的革命更有可能被视为合法。例如，美国的民权运动可以被视为一次允许的革命，因为它通过非暴力抗议和法律挑战来拆除制度性种族主义。该运动获得了广泛支持，并最终导致了重大立法变化，这表明一场革命可以既是伦理的又是有效的。然而，“允许的革命”这一概念并非静态；它随着社会价值观和规范的发展而演变。在今天这个全球化的世界中，被认为允许的标准可能因文化或国家而异。例如，在专制政权中倡导民主的运动在某些背景下可能被视为“允许的革命”，但在其他情况下可能会遭到抵制和谴责。这凸显了在评估革命行为的合法性时理解文化和历史背景的重要性。总之，“允许的革命”的思想是复杂而多面的。它包含伦理考量、公众支持和社会变革的历史背景。当我们反思过去的革命以及世界各地正在进行的正义和平等斗争时，批判性地评估革命被认为是允许的条件至关重要。最终，一场“允许的革命”应旨在创造一个更加公正和平等的社会，摆脱压迫和不公，同时考虑实现这种转变所使用手段的道德影响。