partial award

简明释义

部分仲裁裁决

英英释义

例句

1.After reviewing the evidence, the panel rendered a partial award in favor of the claimant.

在审查证据后，仲裁小组作出了有利于申请人的部分裁决。

2.In international arbitration, a partial award can be enforced separately from the final decision.

在国际仲裁中，部分裁决可以与最终裁决分开执行。

3.The court upheld the partial award, affirming the arbitrator's findings on liability.

法院支持了这项部分裁决，确认了仲裁员关于责任的调查结果。

4.The arbitrator issued a partial award that resolved some of the disputed issues.

仲裁员发布了一项部分裁决，解决了部分争议问题。

5.The partial award allowed the company to recover some of its losses while the case continues.

这项部分裁决使公司在案件继续进行时能够追回部分损失。

作文

In the realm of international arbitration, the term partial award refers to a decision made by an arbitral tribunal that resolves some, but not all, of the issues in dispute between the parties involved. This concept is crucial for understanding how disputes can be managed effectively and efficiently in a legal context. A partial award allows the tribunal to address specific claims or defenses without having to resolve the entire case at once. This can save time and resources for both the parties and the tribunal, which is especially beneficial in complex cases that may involve multiple issues or parties.For instance, consider a scenario where two companies are in a dispute over a contract. The arbitration process may reveal that one party has a clear entitlement to a certain payment, while other aspects of the contract remain contentious. In such a situation, the tribunal might issue a partial award confirming the right to that payment, allowing the winning party to receive funds while the remaining issues are still being deliberated. This approach not only provides immediate relief but also encourages both parties to continue negotiating or preparing for further hearings on unresolved matters.The issuance of a partial award can also have strategic implications for the parties involved. By securing a favorable ruling on a significant issue, a party may gain leverage in subsequent negotiations. This can lead to a quicker resolution of the remaining disputes, as the other party may be more inclined to settle rather than prolong the process. Additionally, a partial award can sometimes be appealed, depending on the jurisdiction and the rules governing the arbitration. This means that even if a party is dissatisfied with a partial award, they may have options to challenge it, potentially affecting the overall outcome of the arbitration.Moreover, the concept of a partial award is not limited to monetary disputes. It can apply to various types of claims, including those involving intellectual property rights, construction contracts, and employment agreements. Each of these areas can present unique challenges that may benefit from the flexibility offered by a partial award. For example, in a construction dispute, a tribunal may issue a partial award regarding the validity of a change order while leaving other claims related to delays or defects for later consideration.However, the use of partial awards is not without its criticisms. Some argue that they can lead to piecemeal litigation, where issues are resolved in isolation rather than in the context of the entire dispute. This could potentially result in inconsistent rulings or a lack of coherence in the final resolution of the case. Furthermore, the additional steps required to address remaining issues after a partial award can prolong the arbitration process, countering the initial intent of efficiency.In conclusion, the concept of a partial award plays a significant role in international arbitration, providing a mechanism for resolving specific issues while allowing the overall process to continue. Its advantages include efficiency, immediate relief, and strategic benefits for the parties involved. However, it is essential to balance these benefits against potential drawbacks, ensuring that the arbitration process remains fair and coherent. Understanding the implications of a partial award is vital for anyone engaged in arbitration, whether as a legal practitioner, a business leader, or a party to a dispute.

在国际仲裁领域，术语部分裁决指的是仲裁庭做出的决定，该决定解决了当事方之间争议的一部分问题，但并未解决所有问题。这个概念对于理解如何在法律背景下有效且高效地管理争议至关重要。部分裁决允许仲裁庭在不必一次性解决整个案件的情况下，处理特定的索赔或辩护。这可以为双方和仲裁庭节省时间和资源，尤其是在涉及多个问题或当事方的复杂案件中。例如，考虑一个场景，其中两家公司因合同发生争议。仲裁过程可能会显示出一方有权获得某项付款，而合同的其他方面仍然存在争议。在这种情况下，仲裁庭可能会发布部分裁决，确认该付款的权利，使得胜诉方能够在剩余问题尚待审理时获得资金。这种方法不仅提供了即时救济，而且鼓励双方继续谈判或准备对未解决事项的进一步听证。发布部分裁决也可能对相关当事方产生战略影响。通过在重大问题上获得有利裁决，一方可能在后续谈判中获得杠杆。这可能导致剩余争议的更快解决，因为另一方可能更倾向于达成和解，而不是拖延过程。此外，部分裁决在某些情况下可以上诉，这取决于管辖权和仲裁规则。这意味着即使一方对部分裁决不满意，他们可能有选项来挑战它，从而潜在地影响仲裁的整体结果。此外，部分裁决的概念并不限于货币争议。它可以适用于各种类型的索赔，包括知识产权、建筑合同和雇佣协议等方面的争议。这些领域中的每一个都可能呈现出独特的挑战，可能受益于部分裁决所提供的灵活性。例如，在建筑争议中，仲裁庭可能会就变更令的有效性发布部分裁决，同时将与延误或缺陷相关的其他索赔留待稍后考虑。然而，使用部分裁决并非没有批评。一些人认为，它们可能导致零散的诉讼，即问题被孤立地解决，而不是在整个争议的背景下解决。这可能导致裁决不一致或最终解决方案缺乏连贯性。此外，在部分裁决之后处理剩余问题所需的额外步骤可能会延长仲裁过程，抵消最初追求效率的意图。总之，部分裁决的概念在国际仲裁中发挥着重要作用，为解决特定问题提供了一种机制，同时允许整体过程继续进行。它的优点包括效率、即时救济和对相关方的战略利益。然而，必须权衡这些好处与潜在的缺点，以确保仲裁过程保持公平和连贯。理解部分裁决的影响对于任何参与仲裁的人来说都是至关重要的，无论是作为法律从业者、商业领袖还是争议的一方。