party line

简明释义

合用线

英英释义

例句

1.During the meeting, everyone was expected to follow the party line 党派立场 to maintain unity.

在会议期间，大家都被期望遵循党派立场以保持团结。

2.Breaking the party line 党派立场 can lead to consequences within the political party.

打破党派立场可能会在政党内部导致后果。

3.The senator was criticized for not adhering to the party line 党派立场 on healthcare reform.

这位参议员因未遵循党派立场在医疗改革问题上的立场而受到批评。

4.The candidates were careful to align their messages with the party line 党派立场 during the campaign.

候选人在竞选期间小心翼翼地使他们的信息与党派立场保持一致。

5.When discussing foreign policy, he always sticks to the party line 党派立场.

在讨论外交政策时，他总是坚持党派立场。

作文

The concept of the party line is often associated with political discourse and the expectations placed on members of a political party to adhere to a unified stance. In many democratic societies, especially those with multiple political parties, the party line serves as a guideline for party members to follow when discussing policies or responding to current events. This practice can be both beneficial and detrimental to the political landscape. On one hand, adhering to the party line can promote unity within a party. When all members present a consistent message, it helps to strengthen the party's identity and makes it easier for voters to understand their platform. For instance, during election campaigns, candidates who stick to the party line can effectively communicate their party's core values and priorities. This consistency can lead to increased voter trust and support, as constituents feel reassured that their representatives are aligned with their beliefs. However, strict adherence to the party line can also stifle individual expression and critical thinking among party members. Politicians may feel pressured to suppress their personal opinions or concerns in favor of the party's official stance. This can result in a lack of genuine debate and discussion on important issues, as members prioritize loyalty to the party over the needs and views of their constituents. In extreme cases, this can lead to a disconnect between elected officials and the people they represent, undermining democracy itself. Moreover, the party line can create an environment where dissenting voices are silenced. Members who dare to challenge the official position may face backlash from their peers or party leadership. This culture of conformity can discourage innovation and prevent new ideas from emerging, ultimately hindering progress within the party and the political system as a whole. In recent years, we have seen examples of both the positive and negative effects of the party line in various political contexts. For example, during times of crisis, such as a national emergency or public health crisis, parties may rally around a common party line to present a united front. This can be crucial for effective governance and can help to reassure the public. However, if the party line ignores scientific evidence or the voices of experts, it can lead to disastrous consequences, as seen in some responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, the party line is a double-edged sword in politics. While it can foster unity and clarity, it can also suppress individuality and critical thought. As citizens, it is essential to remain aware of the implications of the party line and to advocate for a political culture that encourages open dialogue and diverse perspectives. Only then can we ensure that our political systems truly represent the will of the people and address the complex challenges facing our societies today.

“party line”这个概念通常与政治话语和对政党成员遵循统一立场的期望相关。在许多民主社会，尤其是那些拥有多个政党的国家，“party line”作为党内成员在讨论政策或回应时事时的指导方针。这一做法在政治环境中既有益处也有害处。一方面，遵循“party line”可以促进党内团结。当所有成员传达一致的信息时，有助于加强党的身份，使选民更容易理解他们的立场。例如，在选举活动中，坚持“party line”的候选人可以有效地传达党派的核心价值观和优先事项。这种一致性可以增加选民的信任和支持，因为选民感到他们的代表与他们的信仰保持一致。然而，严格遵守“party line”也可能抑制党内成员的个人表达和批判性思维。政治家可能会感到压力，抑制个人观点或关切，以维护党的官方立场。这可能导致在重要问题上的真实辩论和讨论缺乏，因为成员们优先考虑对党的忠诚，而不是选民的需求和观点。在极端情况下，这可能导致当选官员与他们所代表的人民之间的脱节，从而破坏民主本身。此外，“party line”还可能创造出一种压制异议声音的环境。敢于挑战官方立场的成员可能会面临来自同僚或党内领导层的反击。这种服从文化可能会阻碍创新，阻止新思想的出现，最终妨碍党内和整个政治系统的进步。近年来，我们看到在各种政治背景下，“party line”的积极和消极影响的例子。例如，在危机时期，如国家紧急情况或公共卫生危机，政党可能围绕共同的“party line”团结一致，以展示统一的立场。这对于有效治理至关重要，并能帮助安抚公众。然而，如果“party line”忽视科学证据或专家的声音，可能导致灾难性后果，正如在一些应对COVID-19疫情的反应中所见。最终，“party line”在政治中是一把双刃剑。虽然它可以促进团结和清晰，但也可能压制个体性和批判性思维。作为公民，保持对“party line”影响的觉察，并倡导一种鼓励开放对话和多元观点的政治文化是至关重要的。只有这样，我们才能确保我们的政治制度真正代表人民的意愿，解决当今社会面临的复杂挑战。