not specially provided for

简明释义

未另特别列出没有特殊规定未作特别规定(事先没有特殊规定

英英释义

例句

1.The software update includes features that were not specially provided for in the initial release.

软件更新包含了在初始发布中未特别规定的功能。

2.The insurance policy has exclusions for items not specially provided for in the terms.

保险政策对条款中未特别规定的项目有排除。

3.In our contract, any damages that are not specially provided for will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

在我们的合同中，任何未特别规定的损害将逐案评估。

4.The new policy does not cover situations that are not specially provided for in the guidelines.

新政策不涵盖在指导方针中未特别规定的情况。

5.Any expenses incurred that are not specially provided for will need to be approved by management.

任何发生的费用，如果未特别规定，需要管理层批准。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, many aspects of our lives are influenced by technology and innovation. However, there are still areas that remain untouched or not specially provided for by these advancements. This raises important questions about inclusivity and accessibility in various sectors, particularly in education and employment. Take the field of education, for instance. While online learning platforms have made education more accessible to a larger audience, there are still numerous students who lack the necessary resources to benefit from these technologies. Many schools in underprivileged areas do not have the infrastructure to support online learning, leaving a significant number of students not specially provided for in this digital age. This disparity highlights the need for targeted initiatives that address the specific needs of these students. Moreover, in the workplace, the rise of remote work has created a new dynamic. Companies are adopting flexible work policies and utilizing various digital tools to enhance productivity. However, employees with disabilities often find themselves not specially provided for in these new work environments. While some organizations make commendable efforts to create inclusive workplaces, others overlook the unique challenges faced by individuals with disabilities. This oversight can lead to feelings of isolation and exclusion, further perpetuating inequality in the job market. Additionally, the issue of mental health often goes unaddressed in both educational institutions and workplaces. Many programs and resources exist to support physical health, but mental health services are frequently not specially provided for. This lack of attention can have serious consequences, as individuals struggling with mental health issues may feel unsupported and unable to seek help. It is crucial for schools and employers to recognize the importance of mental well-being and to implement strategies that cater to this aspect of health. Furthermore, public policy plays a significant role in determining who gets access to resources and support. Often, government programs are designed with a broad audience in mind, which can result in certain groups being not specially provided for. For example, marginalized communities may face systemic barriers that prevent them from accessing essential services. Policymakers must ensure that their initiatives are inclusive and consider the diverse needs of all citizens. To address these challenges, it is essential for stakeholders—educators, employers, and policymakers—to engage in meaningful dialogue and collaboration. By understanding the unique needs of different groups, we can create solutions that ensure everyone is included and supported. Initiatives such as community outreach programs, accessible training sessions, and inclusive policy-making can help bridge the gap for those who are not specially provided for. In conclusion, while advancements in technology and policy have made strides toward inclusivity, there are still many individuals and groups who remain not specially provided for. It is our collective responsibility to identify these gaps and work towards creating a more equitable society. By doing so, we can ensure that everyone has the opportunity to thrive, regardless of their circumstances.

在当今快速发展的世界中，我们生活的许多方面都受到技术和创新的影响。然而，仍然有许多领域未受到这些进展的触及或没有特别提供。这引发了关于各个行业包容性和可及性的重要问题，尤其是在教育和就业方面。以教育领域为例。虽然在线学习平台使教育对更大受众更加可及，但仍有许多学生缺乏必要的资源来从这些技术中受益。许多贫困地区的学校没有支持在线学习的基础设施，导致大量学生在这个数字时代没有特别提供。这种差距凸显了针对这些学生特定需求的倡议的必要性。此外，在职场中，远程工作的兴起创造了新的动态。公司正在采用灵活的工作政策，并利用各种数字工具来提高生产力。然而，残疾员工常常发现自己在这些新工作环境中没有特别提供。虽然一些组织努力创建包容性的工作场所，但其他组织却忽视了残疾人面临的独特挑战。这种忽视可能导致孤立感和排斥感，进一步加剧就业市场的不平等。此外，心理健康问题在教育机构和工作场所往往未得到解决。许多项目和资源存在于支持身体健康方面，但心理健康服务经常没有特别提供。这种缺乏关注可能会产生严重后果，因为挣扎于心理健康问题的个人可能会感到得不到支持，无法寻求帮助。学校和雇主必须认识到心理健康的重要性，并实施满足这一健康方面的策略。此外，公共政策在决定谁能获得资源和支持方面发挥着重要作用。通常，政府项目是以广泛的受众为目标设计的，这可能导致某些群体没有特别提供。例如，边缘化社区可能面临系统性障碍，阻止他们获得基本服务。政策制定者必须确保他们的倡议是包容性的，并考虑所有公民的多样需求。为了解决这些挑战，利益相关者——教育工作者、雇主和政策制定者——必须进行有意义的对话与合作。通过理解不同群体的独特需求，我们可以创建确保每个人都被纳入并得到支持的解决方案。社区外展项目、可及性培训课程和包容性政策制定等倡议可以帮助填补那些没有特别提供的人的空白。总之，尽管技术和政策的进步在促进包容性方面取得了一定成就，但仍有许多个人和群体保持没有特别提供。我们共同的责任是识别这些差距，并努力创建一个更公平的社会。通过这样做，我们可以确保每个人都有机会蓬勃发展，无论其处境如何。