nominal damages

简明释义

小额损害赔偿名义上的损害赔偿

英英释义

例句

1.The plaintiff received nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 for the breach of contract, despite not suffering any financial loss.

原告因合同违约获得了名义损害赔偿 nominal damages，尽管没有遭受任何经济损失。

2.In tort cases where emotional distress is claimed but not substantiated, courts often grant nominal damages 名义损害赔偿.

在声称但未证实情感痛苦的侵权案件中，法院通常会授予名义损害赔偿 nominal damages。

3.Even though the defendant's actions were wrongful, the jury decided on nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 since there was no significant injury.

尽管被告的行为是错误的，陪审团还是决定给予名义损害赔偿 nominal damages，因为没有重大伤害。

4.In the case of Smith v. Jones, the court awarded only nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 because no actual harm was proven.

在史密斯诉琼斯案中，法院仅授予了名义损害赔偿 nominal damages，因为没有证明实际损害。

5.The judge explained that awarding nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 serves to recognize the violation of rights without substantial loss.

法官解释说，授予名义损害赔偿 nominal damages 的目的是承认权利的侵犯而没有实质性损失。

作文

In the realm of law, the term nominal damages refers to a small sum of money awarded to a plaintiff in a lawsuit when a legal wrong has occurred, but there is no substantial loss or injury to be compensated. This concept serves as a crucial element in understanding how the legal system addresses grievances that may not result in significant financial loss. For instance, if an individual’s rights are violated, but they cannot demonstrate any actual harm or financial damage, the court may still recognize the violation and award nominal damages. The purpose of such an award is not to provide financial relief but rather to acknowledge that a legal wrong has taken place and to affirm the principle of justice. The significance of nominal damages extends beyond mere compensation; it plays an essential role in upholding rights and setting legal precedents. By awarding these damages, courts send a message that even minor violations of rights deserve recognition. This can deter potential offenders from committing similar acts in the future, knowing that the legal system will respond, albeit with a minimal financial penalty. Moreover, nominal damages can also serve as a foundation for further claims. In some cases, a plaintiff may initially receive only nominal damages, but this can pave the way for additional claims if further evidence of harm arises later. It establishes a legal basis that affirms the plaintiff's position, which can be pivotal in subsequent litigation. For example, consider a scenario where a tenant is unlawfully evicted from their apartment without any physical damage to their property. The tenant may not have suffered any financial loss, but the eviction itself constitutes a breach of their rights. In such a case, the court might award nominal damages to recognize the wrongful eviction, reinforcing the tenant's rights under the law. Additionally, nominal damages are often seen in cases involving freedom of speech or other constitutional rights. When individuals challenge laws or actions that infringe upon their rights, they may seek nominal damages as a means to validate their claims, even if they cannot prove significant damages. This aspect of nominal damages highlights its importance in protecting civil liberties and ensuring that individuals can seek redress for violations of their rights. In conclusion, nominal damages play a vital role in the legal system by recognizing and validating the existence of legal wrongs, even in the absence of substantial harm. They serve as a reminder that justice is not solely about financial compensation but also about upholding rights and principles. By awarding nominal damages, courts reinforce the idea that every individual deserves acknowledgment and protection under the law, regardless of the magnitude of the harm suffered. As such, nominal damages are an essential component of the legal landscape, contributing to the broader pursuit of justice and the safeguarding of individual rights.

在法律领域，术语名义损害赔偿指的是在诉讼中，当发生法律错误但没有实质性损失或伤害需要赔偿时，法院向原告授予的一小笔钱。这一概念对于理解法律系统如何处理可能不会导致重大经济损失的投诉至关重要。例如，如果一个人的权利受到侵犯，但他们无法证明任何实际损害或经济损失，法院仍然可能承认这一侵犯，并授予名义损害赔偿。此类赔偿的目的并不是提供经济救济，而是承认法律错误的发生，并确认正义的原则。 名义损害赔偿的重要性超出了简单的赔偿；它在维护权利和设定法律先例方面发挥着重要作用。通过授予这些赔偿，法院传达了即使是微小的权利侵犯也应得到承认的信息。这可以阻止潜在的违法者未来犯下类似行为，因为他们知道法律系统会做出回应，尽管只是一种微不足道的经济惩罚。 此外，名义损害赔偿还可以作为进一步索赔的基础。在某些情况下，原告可能最初仅获得名义损害赔偿，但这可以为后续证据显示损害而铺平道路。它建立了一个法律基础，确认原告的立场，这在后续诉讼中可能至关重要。 例如，考虑一种情境，租户因非法驱逐而被迫离开公寓，而其财产没有遭受任何物理损害。租户可能没有遭受任何经济损失，但驱逐本身构成了对其权利的侵犯。在这种情况下，法院可能会授予名义损害赔偿以承认这一错误驱逐，强化租户在法律下的权利。 此外，名义损害赔偿通常出现在涉及言论自由或其他宪法权利的案件中。当个人挑战侵犯其权利的法律或行为时，他们可能寻求名义损害赔偿作为验证其主张的一种手段，即使他们无法证明重大损害。这一方面突显了名义损害赔偿在保护公民自由和确保个人能够为其权利的侵犯寻求救济方面的重要性。 总之，名义损害赔偿在法律系统中发挥着重要作用，承认并验证法律错误的存在，即使在没有实质性伤害的情况下。它们提醒人们，正义不仅仅关乎经济补偿，还关乎维护权利和原则。通过授予名义损害赔偿，法院强化了每个人都应在法律下得到承认和保护的理念，无论所遭受的伤害大小。因此，名义损害赔偿是法律领域的重要组成部分，有助于更广泛地追求正义和保护个人权利。