nominal damages

简明释义

小额损害赔偿

英英释义

例句

1.The court awarded the plaintiff nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 for the breach of contract, even though no actual loss was proven.

法院对原告因违约获得了名义损害赔偿 nominal damages，尽管没有证明实际损失。

2.The judge explained that nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 serve to vindicate a party's rights, even when no real harm has occurred.

法官解释说，名义损害赔偿 nominal damages 用于维护一方的权利，即使没有发生真正的伤害。

3.In cases of defamation, a jury may decide to grant nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 to acknowledge the wrongdoing without significant financial loss.

在诽谤案件中，陪审团可能会决定给予名义损害赔偿 nominal damages，以承认不当行为而没有重大经济损失。

4.After the lawsuit, the company was ordered to pay nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 to the employee for wrongful termination.

诉讼后，公司被判支付员工因不当解雇而获得的名义损害赔偿 nominal damages。

5.Even if the injury was minimal, the plaintiff received nominal damages 名义损害赔偿 as a way to recognize their legal rights.

即使伤害很小，原告仍获得了名义损害赔偿 nominal damages，以承认他们的法律权利。

作文

In the realm of law, the concept of nominal damages plays a crucial role in understanding how courts address certain types of legal disputes. Essentially, nominal damages refer to a small monetary award granted to a plaintiff when a legal wrong has occurred, but there is no substantial loss or injury that can be quantified. This principle serves to acknowledge that a violation of rights took place, even if it did not result in significant harm. To illustrate this concept, consider a scenario where a person’s property is trespassed upon without any damage occurring. The property owner may feel violated and seek legal recourse. In such a case, the court may decide to award nominal damages to the property owner, recognizing that their rights were infringed upon, despite the absence of any tangible loss. This serves not only to validate the plaintiff's feelings but also to deter future violations by establishing a precedent. The awarding of nominal damages is particularly important in cases involving civil rights violations. For instance, if an individual’s rights are infringed upon by a government entity or another party, but they cannot demonstrate significant financial loss, the court may still award nominal damages. This reinforces the idea that some rights are fundamental and deserve recognition, regardless of the financial implications. It is a way for the judicial system to uphold the rule of law and protect individual rights. Moreover, nominal damages can serve as a stepping stone for further legal action. In some instances, plaintiffs may initially receive nominal damages but later pursue additional claims that could lead to compensatory or punitive damages. This highlights the importance of acknowledging even minor violations, as they can pave the way for more significant legal remedies. Understanding nominal damages also provides insight into the broader context of tort law and contract law. In tort cases, where an individual seeks compensation for harm caused by another's negligence or intentional wrongdoing, nominal damages affirm that the law recognizes the breach of duty, even in the absence of quantifiable damages. Similarly, in contract disputes, when one party fails to fulfill their obligations, the other party may receive nominal damages to signify that a breach occurred, even if no actual loss was sustained. In conclusion, nominal damages serve a vital purpose in the legal system by acknowledging the existence of a legal wrong without requiring proof of substantial harm. They reinforce the protection of individual rights and can motivate parties to adhere to the law. Therefore, understanding nominal damages is essential for anyone navigating the complexities of legal matters, as it highlights the interplay between rights, responsibilities, and the role of the judiciary in upholding justice.

名义损害赔偿在法律领域中发挥着至关重要的作用，帮助人们理解法院如何处理某些类型的法律争议。基本上，名义损害赔偿是指当发生法律侵权但没有实质性损失或伤害可以量化时，法院授予原告的一小笔金钱奖励。这个原则旨在承认虽然没有造成重大伤害，但仍然发生了权利的侵犯。为了说明这个概念，考虑一个场景，一个人的财产被擅自进入而没有任何损害发生。财产所有者可能会感到受到侵犯并寻求法律救济。在这种情况下，法院可能会决定向财产所有者授予名义损害赔偿，承认他们的权利遭到侵犯，尽管没有实际的损失。这不仅是为了验证原告的感受，还为了通过建立先例来阻止未来的侵犯行为。名义损害赔偿在涉及民权侵害的案件中尤为重要。例如，如果一个人的权利被政府实体或其他方侵犯，但他们无法证明显著的经济损失，法院仍可能授予名义损害赔偿。这强调了一些权利是基本的，值得承认，无论其经济影响如何。这是司法系统维护法治和保护个人权利的一种方式。此外，名义损害赔偿还可以作为进一步法律行动的跳板。在某些情况下，原告可能最初获得名义损害赔偿，但随后追求其他索赔，这可能导致补偿性或惩罚性损害赔偿。这突显了即使是微小的侵权行为也应得到承认，因为它们可以为更重大的法律救济铺平道路。理解名义损害赔偿还提供了对侵权法和合同法更广泛背景的洞察。在侵权案件中，当个人寻求因他人的疏忽或故意不当行为造成的伤害的赔偿时，名义损害赔偿确认法律承认了责任的违反，即使没有可量化的损害。同样，在合同争议中，当一方未能履行其义务时，另一方可能会收到名义损害赔偿以表明发生了违约，即使没有实际损失。总之，名义损害赔偿在法律系统中发挥着重要作用，承认法律错误的存在，而无需证明实质性伤害。它们加强了对个人权利的保护，并可以激励各方遵守法律。因此，理解名义损害赔偿对于任何在复杂法律事务中航行的人来说都是必不可少的，因为它突显了权利、责任与司法在维护正义中的作用之间的相互关系。