Nominal Damages

简明释义

名义上的损害赔偿

英英释义

例句

1.In cases of defamation, courts may award Nominal Damages 名义损害赔偿 to acknowledge the violation of rights.

在诽谤案件中，法院可能会授予名义损害赔偿以承认权利的侵犯。

2.The court awarded Nominal Damages 名义损害赔偿 to the plaintiff since there was no substantial loss.

由于没有实质性的损失，法庭向原告授予了名义损害赔偿。

3.Even though the breach of contract caused no real harm, the judge decided to grant Nominal Damages 名义损害赔偿 as a symbolic gesture.

尽管合同的违反没有造成实际损害，法官还是决定作为象征性举措授予名义损害赔偿。

4.The plaintiff received Nominal Damages 名义损害赔偿 for the unauthorized use of their image, despite no financial loss.

尽管没有经济损失，原告因其形象被未经授权使用而获得了名义损害赔偿。

5.After a long trial, the jury concluded that the defendant's actions warranted only Nominal Damages 名义损害赔偿.

经过长时间的审判，陪审团得出结论认为被告的行为只值得名义损害赔偿。

作文

In the realm of law, particularly in tort cases, the concept of Nominal Damages plays a significant role. Nominal Damages are a small sum of money awarded to a plaintiff when a legal wrong has occurred, but no substantial harm or loss has been proven. This legal remedy serves to acknowledge that a right has been violated, even if the violation did not result in any measurable damages. Understanding Nominal Damages is essential for both legal professionals and individuals seeking justice in the court system.To illustrate the importance of Nominal Damages, consider a hypothetical scenario where an individual is wrongfully accused of theft. Although the accusation may have caused emotional distress and reputational harm, the accused person does not suffer any financial loss. In this case, the court might award Nominal Damages to recognize the wrongful act of defamation. The amount awarded could be as little as one dollar, symbolizing that the individual's rights were infringed upon, even if they cannot demonstrate significant damages.The rationale behind awarding Nominal Damages lies in the principle that the law should protect individuals from violations of their rights. It reinforces the idea that every person has the right to seek redress for wrongs done to them, regardless of the economic impact. Moreover, Nominal Damages can serve as a deterrent against future violations by signaling to potential offenders that even minor infringements will not go unpunished.In addition to its role in tort law, Nominal Damages can also appear in contract disputes. For instance, if one party breaches a contract but the other party suffers no actual loss, the aggrieved party may still be entitled to Nominal Damages. This outcome reaffirms the importance of contractual obligations and encourages parties to adhere to their agreements.Critics of Nominal Damages argue that such awards may lead to frivolous lawsuits, where individuals seek compensation for minimal grievances. However, the legal system often addresses these concerns through the requirement of proving some form of wrongdoing. Courts typically evaluate the circumstances surrounding each case to determine whether a claim for Nominal Damages is warranted.Furthermore, Nominal Damages can pave the way for additional remedies in certain cases. For example, if a plaintiff successfully proves a case involving Nominal Damages, they may then pursue punitive damages, which are intended to punish the defendant for particularly egregious behavior. Thus, while Nominal Damages may seem trivial at first glance, they can lay the groundwork for more significant legal outcomes.In conclusion, Nominal Damages serve a vital function in the legal system by acknowledging that rights have been violated, even when no substantial harm has occurred. They ensure that individuals have a means to seek justice and reinforce the importance of upholding legal rights. As legal practitioners and individuals navigate the complexities of the law, understanding the implications and applications of Nominal Damages will remain crucial. This knowledge empowers individuals to advocate for their rights and seek appropriate remedies when faced with legal wrongs.

在法律领域，尤其是在侵权案件中，名义损害赔偿的概念发挥着重要作用。名义损害赔偿是指当发生法律错误但未能证明实质性伤害或损失时，法庭向原告授予的一小笔钱。这种法律救济旨在承认某项权利受到侵犯，即使这种侵犯并未导致任何可衡量的损害。理解名义损害赔偿对于法律专业人士和寻求司法公正的个人来说至关重要。为了说明名义损害赔偿的重要性，可以考虑一个假设场景，其中一个人被错误指控盗窃。尽管这一指控可能造成情感困扰和声誉损害，但被指控的人并未遭受任何经济损失。在这种情况下，法庭可能会授予名义损害赔偿以承认诽谤的错误行为。所授予的金额可能只有一美元，象征着该个人的权利受到侵犯，即使他们无法证明重大损害。授予名义损害赔偿的理由在于法律应保护个人免受权利侵犯的原则。它强化了每个人都有权寻求对其所遭受错误的救济的理念，无论经济影响如何。此外，名义损害赔偿可以作为对未来侵犯行为的威慑，通过向潜在的违法者发出信号，表明即使是轻微的侵犯行为也不会不受惩罚。除了在侵权法中的作用外，名义损害赔偿还可能出现在合同纠纷中。例如，如果一方违反合同，但另一方没有遭受实际损失，受损方仍可能有权获得名义损害赔偿。这一结果重申了合同义务的重要性，并鼓励各方遵守协议。名义损害赔偿的批评者认为，这种赔偿可能导致无谓的诉讼，即个人因微不足道的委屈而寻求赔偿。然而，法律系统通常通过要求证明某种形式的错误来解决这些担忧。法庭通常会评估每个案件的具体情况，以确定是否有必要提出名义损害赔偿的索赔。此外，名义损害赔偿在某些案件中可以为额外的救济铺平道路。例如，如果原告成功证明涉及名义损害赔偿的案件，他们可能随后追求惩罚性损害赔偿，旨在惩罚被告特别恶劣的行为。因此，尽管名义损害赔偿乍一看似乎微不足道，但它们可以为更重大的法律结果奠定基础。总之，名义损害赔偿在法律系统中发挥着重要作用，通过承认权利受到侵犯，即使没有发生实质性伤害。它们确保个人有手段寻求公正，并强化了维护法律权利的重要性。当法律从业者和个人在法律的复杂性中导航时，理解名义损害赔偿的含义和应用将始终至关重要。这种知识使个人能够为自己的权利辩护，并在面临法律错误时寻求适当的救济。